Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
All of you should STFU. LOSERS!!
Oh, yeh...And the above manager needs extra "training."
All of you should STFU. LOSERS!!
I know all the company cares about is growth vials. However, base vials are compensated fairly. You are going to lose some good reps.
OMG.....Shut the F*ck up already with this.
WHOEVER DOESN'T ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE RANK REPORT IS A FRAUD, YOU NEED TO SHUT THE F*UCK UP AND STAY OFF THIS THREAD! IT IS A FACT THEY ARE NOT ACCURATE. ITS NOT ABOUT SELLING SKILLS. ITS ABOUT AVERAGE SELLING REPS AT BEST BEING GIFTED EXTRA ACCOUNTS AND NOW SUDDENLY THEY ARE WONDERFUL AND THEIR RANKINGS ARE HIGH. GEE, HOW DID THAT HAPPEN? UH, WE GAVE THEM SIX MORE HOSPITALS BUT WE STILL ARE GOING TO COMPARE THEM TO THE REPS THAT DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY ADDITIONAL ACCOUNTS. YEAH, THAT'S FAIR...DUH...DUH..DUM.DE..DUM
Now that's taking ownership and demanding accountability. Congratulations on your rant but find another venue you are sucking the life out of everyone you know. Give it a rest too bad I can't block your stupid posts
Ok. Understand. What do you think the company should do with those accounts? Leave them uncovered? Each one of those according to my manager comes with history and it is not usually good history. So, it is not a gift unless you consider 70 cents on a vial for a low base a gift. I can't imagine a scenario where it is over a few hundred dollars. I still don't get it.
You don't get it b/c you are not accountable for your rankings. Or, you are not in the top 10% unfairly getting passed by this process. One account added or 10 accounts added to a territory automatically GIFT vial potential. Even at .70 cents a vial in a low account pushes original baseline into growth vials compounding earnings which pushes up the rankings of recipient. Add the accounts that are high performing and you might understand at $4/vial how much incentive it is hoping your partner quits and you get their territory accounts GIFTED to you. Maybe this makes sense. Example of rep in my district made extra $15,000 per quarter above original territory payout b/c of gifted accounts. Higher rankings. More stock. Going to presidents club. If you don't get this, then you're trying not to get it. Liberal!
I agree with you. It's like Management determined who they wanted to go to Costa Rica with and then gifted them accounts to make it happen. That's why I had 2 interviews last week. You've got to leave this place because you can't trust these people. I've spoken with other managers from Genentech and Scios that knew these people...wish I had done it before taking the job. They're not good people.
Ok. Understand. What do you think the company should do with those accounts? Leave them uncovered? Each one of those according to my manager comes with history and it is not usually good history. So, it is not a gift unless you consider 70 cents on a vial for a low base a gift. I can't imagine a scenario where it is over a few hundred dollars. I still don't get it.
You don't get it b/c you are not accountable for your rankings. Or, you are not in the top 10% unfairly getting passed by this process. One account added or 10 accounts added to a territory automatically GIFT vial potential. Even at .70 cents a vial in a low account pushes original baseline into growth vials compounding earnings which pushes up the rankings of recipient. Add the accounts that are high performing and you might understand at $4/vial how much incentive it is hoping your partner quits and you get their territory accounts GIFTED to you. Maybe this makes sense. Example of rep in my district made extra $15,000 per quarter above original territory payout b/c of gifted accounts. Higher rankings. More stock. Going to presidents club. If you don't get this, then you're trying not to get it. Liberal!
Totally right! Agreed.
Not a gift recipient. BUT, get your facts straight. 1. The territories dissolved were not thriving territories and didn't have more than one or two producing accounts. 2. The previous quarter's vials from that account would also be "gifted" to the new HSS covering account. You all sound like ABC news...making shit up as you go.
Not a gift recipient. BUT, get your facts straight. 1. The territories dissolved were not thriving territories and didn't have more than one or two producing accounts. 2. The previous quarter's vials from that account would also be "gifted" to the new HSS covering account. You all sound like ABC news...making shit up as you go.
Not a gift recipient. BUT, get your facts straight. 1. The territories dissolved were not thriving territories and didn't have more than one or two producing accounts. 2. The previous quarter's vials from that account would also be "gifted" to the new HSS covering account. You all sound like ABC news...making shit up as you go.