Why does GSK have the most negative threads of any Pharma Company?

[anonymous]

All the more reason I carry my 9 everyday.

Sure, Howdy Doody.

 

[anonymous]

GSK has the most negative threads because it’s an awful place for representatives to work . The Oncology sales force has been decimated by people leaving . Great reps going elsewhere.

 

[anonymous]

Because it's a failing company that is doing such a good job at failing, it has decided to split itself into two failing companies.

 

[anonymous]

Because it’s filled with dumb men. I’m a proud American woman and we stand together!

 

[anonymous]

So many negative threads.
So many bad people.
SOPHIE LIEBERMANN is just one of many bad and or poor people.
Such a bad place.

 

[anonymous]

Come on man!! Because poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.

 

[anonymous]

It's like when my grandpop worked for Murican Oil building jargy stations.

 

[anonymous]

So many negative threads.
So many bad people.
SOPHIE LIEBERMANN is just one of many bad and or poor people.
Such a bad place.

Because she called out your pathetic performance she is bad? Go look in the mirror douche bag and realize what your kids see in you and set a better example you lazy piece of shit.

 

[anonymous]

Because she called out your pathetic performance she is bad? Go look in the mirror douche bag and realize what your kids see in you and set a better example you lazy piece of shit.

sure thing Sophie.
go and call HR to cover your rear end.
you are so predictable.

 

[anonymous]

sure thing Sophie.
go and call HR to cover your rear end.
you are so predictable.

Not Sophie, just recognize the difference between someone doing their job (Sophie) and an embarrassment to their kids and parents (you). Maybe if you got to work you piece of shit the target would be off your back?

 

[anonymous]

Not Sophie, just recognize the difference between someone doing their job (Sophie) and an embarrassment to their kids and parents (you). Maybe if you got to work you piece of shit the target would be off your back?

Thanks for the input Sophie.

 

[anonymous]

Thanks for the input Sophie.

Trust me, it doesn’t take Sophie to get on here to call you out for being the pathetic douche bag that you are. We’re all talking about it. Thank goodness Sophie has the balls to not put up with this shit. It’s about time you were held accountable.

 

[anonymous]

Sophie. So obvious to the blind.

 

[anonymous]

Not Sophie, just recognize the difference between someone doing their job (Sophie) and an embarrassment to their kids and parents (you). Maybe if you got to work you piece of shit the target would be off your back?

Hi Sophie

 

[anonymous]

Sophie. So obvious to the blind.

Not even the same gender nor in the same state as Sophie, but still recognize your douche-baggery and just love you being held to the fire now. More impressive to me though is how you look in the mirror? Not to mention what your wife and parents think about you. We just think you’re a piece of shit, which isn’t that big of a deal, really. But the disappointment your family has in you is the sad part. Looking forward to hearing of your exit, and when it happens, I’ll congratulate those that finally got rid of you.

 

[anonymous]

Trust me, it doesn’t take Sophie to get on here to call you out for being the pathetic douche bag that you are. We’re all talking about it. Thank goodness Sophie has the balls to not put up with this shit. It’s about time you were held accountable.

reading this thread leads me to believe that where there is smoke their must be a fire. Why would so many be making negative claims against Sophie if there was no truth to it. always two sides to a story and supporters and non supporters.
if there are any truths to her negative actions why would gsk keep her around?

 

[anonymous]

reading this thread leads me to believe that where there is smoke their must be a fire. Why would so many be making negative claims against Sophie if there was no truth to it. always two sides to a story and supporters and non supporters.
if there are any truths to her negative actions why would gsk keep her around?

 

[anonymous]

reading this thread leads me to believe that where there is smoke their must be a fire. Why would so many be making negative claims against Sophie if there was no truth to it. always two sides to a story and supporters and non supporters.
if there are any truths to her negative actions why would gsk keep her around?

There aren’t “so many”…there is one particular embarrassingly pathetic individual that just multi-posts shit because he’s too pathetic to just work. And you are dead right about one thing, if there were HR issues with her she would possibly be in jeopardy herself, but she’s likely not because she’s DOING HER JOB!

 

[anonymous]

There aren’t “so many”…there is one particular embarrassingly pathetic individual that just multi-posts shit because he’s too pathetic to just work. And you are dead right about one thing, if there were HR issues with her she would possibly be in jeopardy herself, but she’s likely not because she’s DOING HER JOB!

Hi Sophie.

 

[anonymous]

GSK is absolutely the worst! Brainless management with their chosen little pet backstabbers