What is the mandate refusal severance package?













As is Biden. It tells you a lot about a country when they chose to follow and worship a man with no morals who could care less about the lives of the people he rules in terms of trying to protect them against spreading an illness that can kill them - and I’m describing the former guy.

Take more meds, less comments on threads.
 












The word I've heard is that you wouldn't get severance since you would be terminated for disobeying a mandate/requirement.

A mandate isn't going to work unless there's pain involved. If you've been with the company 25 years and the choice is "get vaccinated or leave with 50 weeks of severance", everyone would rush for the door. If the choice is "get vaccinated or leave with a kiss on the lips", different outcome.
 






The word I've heard is that you wouldn't get severance since you would be terminated for disobeying a mandate/requirement.

A mandate isn't going to work unless there's pain involved. If you've been with the company 25 years and the choice is "get vaccinated or leave with 50 weeks of severance", everyone would rush for the door. If the choice is "get vaccinated or leave with a kiss on the lips", different outcome.

Which is precisely why they have not disclosed the process, even vaccinated people would lie and say they were not vaccinated if they could get a package and get out of this dumpster fire.

Transparency- you know.
 




































Can’t negotiate a severance for a policy violation and not getting the vaccine is a policy violation.[/QUOTE

Agreed, issues and assessments of job performance can be subjective. Policy is black and white, either you are compliant or you are not. Just like getting caught cheating on expense report. Gone!

The only hope for unvaccinated now is legal objections to the policy that stick.
Of course today’s fully vaccinated will have to line up for shot #3 to maintain their employment status soon.
 






























Can’t negotiate a severance for a policy violation and not getting the vaccine is a policy violation.

I think we should have a policy that all women of child bearing age *MUST* be on birth control - this policy is imperative to protect our fragile and overloaded health system from being overwhelmed but moreso to maintain GSK's productivity, readiness and preparedness. I don't see how anyone could find this objectionable.
 






I think we should have a policy that all women of child bearing age *MUST* be on birth control - this policy is imperative to protect our fragile and overloaded health system from being overwhelmed but moreso to maintain GSK's productivity, readiness and preparedness. I don't see how anyone could find this objectionable.

That is a climate-friendly solution too. No diapers for landfills and no tiny carbon footprints. Just one miss in your policy, you failed to acknowledge that Transmen can get pregnant too.

So to be fair and inclusive, every employee between the age of puberty and 50 *MUST* be on birth control. Save the planet.

There, I fixed it.
 






I think we should have a policy that all women of child bearing age *MUST* be on birth control - this policy is imperative to protect our fragile and overloaded health system from being overwhelmed but moreso to maintain GSK's productivity, readiness and preparedness. I don't see how anyone could find this objectionable.

Did Tucker C give you this stupid analogy?
 






I think we should have a policy that all women of child bearing age *MUST* be on birth control - this policy is imperative to protect our fragile and overloaded health system from being overwhelmed but moreso to maintain GSK's productivity, readiness and preparedness. I don't see how anyone could find this objectionable.

Even better…all men need to get vasectomies, which can be reversed. Problem solved.