What are the global warming pussies saying

[ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng]

Worked it out 'somehow'? Like how, pixie dust? Talk about naivety.

OK, here's some warming facts & figures, get ready for a new immigration issue:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110128/sc_nm/us_climate_arctic

You guys are like moving targets. One minute you guys say 30 year old data is too ancient to be reliable, then here you come peddling 2,000 year old numbers. Didn't you know that Brokeback, et al say technology (no thermometers) 30 years ago was inadequate to be used today?

You libtards are the most indecisive bunch of drones.

 

[Conservative Independent Here]

If you don't like 30 year old data, what do you think about 2000 year old data that's actually a collection of folk tales that have been translated so many times no one knows what the originals said? And the stories are all about stuff like boats that roam the world picking up animal couples and corpses that fly into the air in Springtime?

Oh ye of little faith. Have you ever heard of DNA? Do you suppose God, being All Powerful could withdraw DNA from animals all over the world. (Do you think on a ark of the size Noah built that small tubes of DNA could be carried with two of every animal and all of Noah's family) From animals from even those parts that are yet to be discovered, and reanimate them after the flood, spreading them to all four corners of the world where they belong?

God works in mysterious ways....

 

[ThisIsYorCaptnSpkng]

If you don't like 30 year old data, what do you think about 2000 year old data that's actually a collection of folk tales that have been translated so many times no one knows what the originals said? And the stories are all about stuff like boats that roam the world picking up animal couples and corpses that fly into the air in Springtime?

You don't read so good, do ya? Looks like your Vaginitis has gotten to your brain. Your 30-year issue is with your own fellow AGW morons.

 

[AnswerMan4Ever!]

You guys are like moving targets. One minute you guys say 30 year old data is too ancient to be reliable, then here you come peddling 2,000 year old numbers. Didn't you know that Brokeback, et al say technology (no thermometers) 30 years ago was inadequate to be used today?

You libtards are the most indecisive bunch of drones.

>>>The summer water temperatures, reconstructed from the makeup of tiny organisms buried in sediments in the Fram strait, have risen from an average 5.2 degrees Celsius (41.36F) from 1890-2007 and about 3.4C (38.12F) in the previous 1,900 years.<<

yeah right

 

[Breakingnews]

>>>The summer water temperatures, reconstructed from the makeup of tiny organisms buried in sediments in the Fram strait, have risen from an average 5.2 degrees Celsius (41.36F) from 1890-2007 and about 3.4C (38.12F) in the previous 1,900 years.<<

yeah right

If ginkers like you and 4DumbViews had been around in 1492, you would have told Columbus "Never mind, the world is flat".

Continue to waddle in your ignorance, you climate bitches crack me up.

 

[Romney/Crist2012]

Hey libtards look out your window.
No matter where you are there's likely snow on the ground.
There is no global warming its snowing.

 

[libluvsbukkake]

It's 14 degrees right now in Dallas. It's warmer in Anchorage and Juneau. It must be the Sarah Palin-induced global warming in Alaska. Thanks Sarah. You pushed the cold down here. You are destroying America.

 

[I Love America]

I find it hilarious that libtardiots are still so stupid they believe the lies that are Goober Warming. They make me laugh

 

[I Love America]

You should change your name to I Laugh America then.

Did you learn that at Planned Parenthood trolling for new girlfriends?

 

[I Love America]

Since you've once again, laid bare your Achille's heel, there's something I've been meaning to axe you, Bubble Boinker and M(other)F(ucker) for A(ll) (Seasons). Your contention is that the collection of cells that is in a body and dependent on that body for life - is in fact life and interrupting it's course is murder. The Catholics used to say the same thing about sperm. It's definitely alive and interruption (ie jacking off, using a condom, swallowing a load, etc) of sperm will not only kill it but interrupt the formation of a life.

How did you come to the decision that facilitating death of living, wiggling sperm cells is O.K but facilitating the demise of the collection of cells we call a fetus is not O.K? Sounds like you give yourself a lot of power plus being in frequent masturbation mode - you muder a lot of precursers to life. Next time you're standing there - with a handful of you know what, think about how many beautiful babies will never be born because of what you just did.Then hang your head in shame.

It is amazing how you twist yourself in knots trying to defend your murderous intentions to spare your precious 401K from some po black baby.

I don't think I have ever made the claim that sperm in and of itself is life. So the entire premise of your question is rendered moot.

However, your argument that the unborn baby is dependent on the mother falls flat on its face. For you see my simple minded dipshit, a new born is dependent on its mother as well. It cannot survive on its own. If you abandoned your child post birth, you would be guilty of murder correct?

Now, quick, run to your last defense "BUT WHAT ABOUT RAPE AND INCEST?" which is where all you death merchants go when the sands of your weak argument go washing out under your feet.

 

[Man For All Seasons]

Since you've once again, laid bare your Achille's heel, there's something I've been meaning to axe you, Bubble Boinker and M(other)F(ucker) for A(ll) (Seasons). Your contention is that the collection of cells that is in a body and dependent on that body for life - is in fact life and interrupting it's course is murder. The Catholics used to say the same thing about sperm. It's definitely alive and interruption (ie jacking off, using a condom, swallowing a load, etc) of sperm will not only kill it but interrupt the formation of a life.

How did you come to the decision that facilitating death of living, wiggling sperm cells is O.K but facilitating the demise of the collection of cells we call a fetus is not O.K? Sounds like you give yourself a lot of power plus being in frequent masturbation mode - you muder a lot of precursers to life. Next time you're standing there - with a handful of you know what, think about how many beautiful babies will never be born because of what you just did.Then hang your head in shame.

ILA has already set the match to your straw man argument!

But I'll add the following comments, since you foolishly decided to call me out!

Sad to see that you are still incredibly ignorant when it comes to basic biology. Sperm do not constitute a genetically distinct human entity. A fetus does.

The Catholic stance on birth control has more to do with the sanctity of the sex act and it's potential to create life and not some sanctity of sperm.

My what a stupid "smart" guy you are!

 

[I Love America]

The 'BFD' is the FACT that 2010 tied for the warmest year on record.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100919104002.htm

That's about what you forgot when you started this thread.

You are out of your league on this one, chopper.

Tell me you still don't believe this Goober Warming stuff? ROFLMAO

 

[Conservative Independent Here]

Way back in the day the Sun revolved around the Earth. As a matter of fact, we were thought to be the center of the universe. These were also scientifically sound.
The evidence of AGW is clear and scientifically proven. Look it up. I already did many times and you folks have ignored the overwhelming evidence. Why? Because you do not want to be inconvienced. It is to expensive. Religion or stupidity, they are both the same. Take your pick.

Okay, there you go actually strengthening my argument again....yes, it was science that said we were the center of the Universe and the church preached it from the pulpit.

So yes, science has been proven again and again to be wrong.

 

[AnswerMan4Ever!]

It is amazing how you twist yourself in knots trying to defend your murderous intentions to spare your precious 401K from some po black baby.

.

ILA has already set the match to your straw man argument!

!

Comon you two! Give the guy a break! One does not go from posting about underage sex with girls, doing drugs, the joys of lesbianism, people/entertainment tonight updates, and preferred lubricants for whacking off, to being an expert in politics, travel, finance, religion, geography, philosophy, psychology, the economy, and World history overnight.

 

[Man For All Seasons]

Science proved religion to be wrong again and again.

You are wrong as usual!

 

[I Love America]

I still can't believe these libtardiots believe this Goober Warming bullshit. They sure are a gullible bunch

 

[D_A_R_T_H]

It’s hard to believe even you idiots would be so ignorant about the truth of AGW happening now due to man. What do you think we can burn all the fossil fuel we want without consequence? Is that what you REALLY believe?

 

[Man For All Seasons]

It’s hard to believe even you idiots would be so ignorant about the truth of AGW happening now due to man. What do you think we can burn all the fossil fuel we want without consequence? Is that what you REALLY believe?

What we know is that the earth has seen massive climate shifts long before man started burning fossil fuels. This one FACT alone pretty much destroys the whole legitimacy of AGW hysteria and behavior control agenda.

There is no sound reason to believe that burning fossil fuels has made a significant difference to global climate. The climate changes, always has, always will. It is quite possible that warming is occurring, but big deal, that's happened many times in the past and we survived.

ILA also had a pertinent question which the Voice of Idiocy foolishly tried to disparage. Just what is the ideal temp? Do YOU know what it is? Does anyone?

 

[Voice of Reason]

What we know is that the earth has seen massive climate shifts long before man started burning fossil fuels. This one FACT alone pretty much destroys the whole legitimacy of AGW hysteria and behavior control agenda.

Yes. Using your logic... And the FACT that cancer has occured for milennia destroys the whole legitiamcy of the idea that man made chemicals in the enviornment can cause cancer.

 

[I Love America]

It’s hard to believe even you idiots would be so ignorant about the truth of AGW happening now due to man. What do you think we can burn all the fossil fuel we want without consequence? Is that what you REALLY believe?

Oh I am sure that there are consequences, but the benefits outweigh any risks.

Feel free to completely eliminate all fossil fuel usage if you feel that strongly about it.

don't let me stop you