Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
As Cubist continues to experience growth and success the surprising result has been a decline in employee satisfaction. Success at the company and executive level is at record levels in contrast to the lower bonus and the removal of stock options at the field level. Why is it that we are seeing higher turnover and lower job satisfaction? You could try to explain it away and say that those that leave or don't like it here are failing to embrace change or you could try to address the real issues.
Yet studies indicate that employee engagement, a term barely heard before the late 1990s, is generally low and has become a major issue for organizations large and small. Employers are struggling to take out costs and capacity and yet still keep employees engaged, committed and performing.
So why is employee engagement in such short supply? Engaged employees have a real connection with their organization. They get support from effective line managers and are both informed and heard. They have parameters within which they can succeed and have freedom to do so. They can also be themselves and grow in jobs which are meaningful. The employment deal feels fair and above all employees and employers trust each other.
A lack of both “engaging leadership” and “engaging managers”, concluding that executives either don’t take engagement seriously, and/or lack the skills to create the conditions for engagement.
We've had the theme of "Patients First" in our organization, after that comes the shareholders, then the employees. We've lost our way and in order to continue to be successful the order should be Employees First, Patients Second, Shareholders Third.
Yet studies indicate that employee engagement, a term barely heard before the late 1990s, is generally low and has become a major issue for organizations large and small. Employers are struggling to take out costs and capacity and yet still keep employees engaged, committed and performing.
So why is employee engagement in such short supply? Engaged employees have a real connection with their organization. They get support from effective line managers and are both informed and heard. They have parameters within which they can succeed and have freedom to do so. They can also be themselves and grow in jobs which are meaningful. The employment deal feels fair and above all employees and employers trust each other.
A lack of both “engaging leadership” and “engaging managers”, concluding that executives either don’t take engagement seriously, and/or lack the skills to create the conditions for engagement.
We've had the theme of "Patients First" in our organization, after that comes the shareholders, then the employees. We've lost our way and in order to continue to be successful the order should be Employees First, Patients Second, Shareholders Third.