HAHA funny stuff! You must be the sad ass "counterpart" mentioned in the deposition who bragged about helping his manager get his "partner" fired so he wouldnt be in the territory alone. Funny how things work out. Again no one takes the time to be informed, to go and actually read the public record. There was no accusation, ever, of innapropriate use of samples or any action that was worthy of termination. Even the judge in the unemployment trial agreed. Composing a long list of questions to ask a rep about that happened 8 months earlier is totally bogus. Questions that could have been brought up while the rep was still in territory prior to maternity leave. The "clairification meeting" in August mentioned in testimony was a total joke! Hansen had already announced, ironically on the date of the birth of her child, that R had been fired and he planned to put the tri-cities rep in the position. Another male rep got the spot according to the documents.
Bottom line... belive what you want. Don't take the time to read the testimony that was provided under oath, its way more interesting to make it up as you go along. BTW there are hundereds of pages of Depositions that provide vast quantities of details including names and dates.
Enjoy! Ignorance is bliss and makes you believe you are right!