Study Shows Global Warming Is Real













http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44996377/ns/us_news-christian_science_monitor/

This study was partially funded by climate change denier and fossil fuel magnate Koch industries.

The truth is hard to cover up . . . The deniers look smaller every day.

I have never denied that global climate change is real and is happening. I have never seen anyone on this board deny it.

What is in question is anthropogenicity which has NOT been proven. This is about the fifth time you have tried to float this boat. How long have you had this learning disability?
 






I have never denied that global climate change is real and is happening. I have never seen anyone on this board deny it.

What is in question is anthropogenicity which has NOT been proven. This is about the fifth time you have tried to float this boat. How long have you had this learning disability?

Your boat sank along time ago - Did you suffer a recent head injury?
 






1. Hurricanes frequency is down
2. Temperatures are not increasing over the last decade; yet CO2 continues to increase. No correlation seen between CO2 and temps; never mind causation proven.
3. Vostok Ice Cores show C2 increases come AFTER temp increases
4. The rate of temp increase in that graph is the same during the early 1900s as it was in the late 1900s - yet there was way more CO2 emissions going into the air and way LESS CO2 emissions going into the air back then. There isn't even a correlation between CO2 and temp increases; never mind a proven causation
5. More snow pack last winter; ice getting thicker in Antarctica: http://www.news.com.au/antarctic-ice-is-growing-not-melting-away/story-0-1225700043191
6. Polar bears are thriving and increasing their population: http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/190...h-world-wide-fund-wwf-geological-survey-s.htm
7. Scientists fudging data and are clearly politically motivated
8. Al Gore is not a credible scientist (and won't even debate the matter with a scientist from the other side of the debate)
8. Until Gore stops doing this: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2010/05/exclusive-estimate-carbon-footprint-of.html

He should expect nobody to take him seriously.
 






Post #5 is the perfect example of a denier looking very small now. In spite of this latest report, he continues to throw shit into the fan, only to have it come back ad get splattered all over his ugly mug.
 






http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44996377/ns/us_news-christian_science_monitor/

This study was partially funded by climate change denier and fossil fuel magnate Koch industries.

The truth is hard to cover up . . . The deniers look smaller every day.

You have been had once again and you're too stupid to even recognize it!

You got suckered by a seventh-grade level article!

How convenient that you sort of forgot to mention that the "new data" Spotts purports to be reporting has not yet been published or subject to peer review. I guess the best that you "the sky is falling!" types is quoted from third-party sources. That unbelievable idiot Spotts didn't even bother to interview the author of the "study". Care to take bets that the "data" will never be published?

So this is how we post "scholarly" research these days? By posting it on a Berkely global warming web site?

The new research, which has yet to be formally published but which appears in four papers posted on BerkeleyEarth.org, uses new analytical techniques and a much larger set of records than the previous studies did.

As far as Gates and Koch "funding" the study, the checks probably went out on the same day as 10,000 other $5 checks went out. But then we really don't know, do we?
 












You have been had once again and you're too stupid to even recognize it!

You got suckered by a seventh-grade level article!

How convenient that you sort of forgot to mention that the "new data" Spotts purports to be reporting has not yet been published or subject to peer review. I guess the best that you "the sky is falling!" types is quoted from third-party sources. That unbelievable idiot Spotts didn't even bother to interview the author of the "study". Care to take bets that the "data" will never be published?

So this is how we post "scholarly" research these days? By posting it on a Berkely global warming web site?



As far as Gates and Koch "funding" the study, the checks probably went out the same day as 10,000 other $5 checks went out. But then we really don't know, do we?

Since you are well on the way to becoming eeven more less relevant than flag avatar guy, I will just sit back and chuckle at your above response.

No matter what sort of facts/evidence are presented, if you decide that it don't into your partisan and archaic veiw of the world, you will dispute it and try your best to discredit the premise in any way possible. Unless something comes from a 'conservative' source, you put your head in the sand and turn a blind eye to the facts.

You are an EPIC FAILIURE and you run around this board like a little dog who humps the leg of everyone in the room.

Please try to stop wasting any more band space with your continued foolishness as you once again show us all why you are the CP village idiot.
 
























So what are you doing about it other than flailing away miserably on a message board for pharma reps?

So what are you doing flailing away like a blind man chasing a pinata with your endless drivel filled threads and mindless posts?

You sure jumped on quick to reply to this thread and you just keep getting worse at this with each word you type.

Get back in the corner, sit down and stay there.
 






So what are you doing flailing away like a blind man chasing a pinata with your endless drivel filled threads and mindless posts?

You sure jumped on quick to reply to this thread and you just keep getting worse at this with each word you type.

Get back in the corner, sit down and stay there.

Maybe the question was too deep for you, ot surprising given what you do for a living and having to be told what to do and say by your elders.

Let me try again. What are you doing about global warming? Like all libs, I suspect zero. You just wanna bitch
 






Maybe the question was too deep for you, ot surprising given what you do for a living and having to be told what to do and say by your elders.

Let me try again. What are you doing about global warming? Like all libs, I suspect zero. You just wanna bitch

Try sticking to the topic of the OP instead of hijacking it with your false assumptions about other RP's.

And you wonder why you and your multiple screen names have become an irrelevant punchline here on CP?
 












Once again you try to dodge an issue with the boring "off topic" ploy. Answer the man's question, little girl.

There is no dodging here, I just pointed out the obvious as to how your partner ILA likes to change the subject of the OP and hijack a thread. He is hardly a 'man' and doesn't deserve any answer short of STFU.

Now run along, gramps, before you soil your Attends again
 


















Another weekend and we have more propaganda and off the topic posts from the shills for the denier of the week club. The message behind their repetitive posts is that deniers have no case. When they try to argue the science they are always embarrassed and borrow all their arguments from right-wing denier sites. So since they can not argue the science, they post articles attacking the other RP's and the scientific establishment.