Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Why is it that every year we even get close to not hitting the "number" our "leaders" start floating out terribly veiled adjectives/phrases for reducing headcount? Becoming more "efficient" and reducing "bureaucracy" means "we need to make cuts". This type of leadership gets tiresome.
Kodak stopped innovating. Plain and simple. They didn't cut their sales force like we will. We keep the ethicon reps from stealing business and we drive new business but we're the first on the chopping block? Instead of cutting the sales team maybe we should start firing folks on the R&D and manufacturing teams whom continue to struggle to consistently bring new products to market and keep others from back ordering.
And if you must "eliminate bureaucracy" from the sales team "to make quicker decisions" (which is baloney) start with the managers who only "manage" 6-8 reps each. Make them actually begin to earn their bloated salaries by "managing" 10-12 reps each. Then you can also eliminate 2-3 VPs.
Kodak stopped innovating. Plain and simple. They didn't cut their sales force like we will. We keep the ethicon reps from stealing business and we drive new business but we're the first on the chopping block? Instead of cutting the sales team maybe we should start firing folks on the R&D and manufacturing teams whom continue to struggle to consistently bring new products to market and keep others from back ordering.
And if you must "eliminate bureaucracy" from the sales team "to make quicker decisions" (which is baloney) start with the managers who only "manage" 6-8 reps each. Make them actually begin to earn their bloated salaries by "managing" 10-12 reps each. Then you can also eliminate 2-3 VPs.