anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Keeping all in prayer and so sorry this is happening. The naysayers can start their own thread. We don't need the negativity.
Make it like cafepharma, but for different industries: over the years we’ve had suggestions for creating a site similar to cafepharma, but for different industries. Now there is a place. Check out CompanyUnderground for company forums in other industries. Don’t see a company? Request it here. Let your friends and family outside the pharma/medical sales space know they now have a safe, anonymous place to talk.
The sole reason ANY company hires sales reps is to generate revenue. There is no other reason.
In the case of pharma companies, and specifically GNE in this case, the statistical model which looks at market factors and impactable sales provides forecast for what level of sales can be achieved with various levels of sales staff.
In this specific case it appears that the incremental gain in sales revenue going forward (not historical sales levels) does not justify the investment required to fund the sales force as it was previously.
For an example, say a company has a forecast model that says with 50 reps we can generate $500M in the coming year. Then they look at the law of diminishing return and see that due to market conditions, competition, promotional sensitivity, and degree of impactable sales, 75 reps will generate $720M. Still a reasonable investment, but the revenue per rep has declined from the initial $10M/rep model to $9.6M/rep. Then they model a 90 rep sales force and see that it will generate $800M, and 100 reps generates $820M, $8.9M/rep and $8.2M/rep respectively. Remember, the market is not limitless, there is a theoretical maximum level of market penetration and achievable sales.
Now the company has to decide of all the money it has to invest in everything from capital equipment, to R&D, to manpower, what is the smartest level of investment for this sales force size. Now you might say that 10 reps generating that last additional $20M is still in the black when you consider salaries and benefits, but what you are missing is the opportunity cost. That investment might generate $100M ($10M/rep) somewhere else in the organization, instead of the $2M/rep. It's called optimizing ROI.
The MS franchise does not operate in a vacuum, you are part of a large multi-faceted international organization. Sales teams are investments in future sales and not based upon the prior year's sales.
it's nothing personal, it's just how business works. Businesses that don't exercise this type of fiduciary responsibility with investors money will find themselves lacking capital for investments to remain competitive, to develop and market new products, leading ultimately to failure of the company to thrive and the loss of many more if not all employee jobs.
Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. Matthew 6:19-21
You’re an idiot. Until you walk in someone’s else’s shoes stop giving your biased opinion. You have diarrhea of the mouth. There are people that changed their whole lives for this opportunity that doesn’t need to be discussed other than hug changes are not made for a two year gig. Now you go and get real as you need to come back down to Earth vs your fairyland. You are the type blowhard that thinks they know everything. Pathetic.