Praluent is Fine



















You sound like one of sharp leaders in medical science department who thought it was fine to violate a patent . Regeneron totally fucked this up with arrogance and incompetence. It's bad enough Sanofi has carried you since launch as your salesforce had no Cardiology experience. Let's see what did you contribute !! The Hub!!! And you couldn't of fucked that up anymore if you tried . This drug is gone and many people will lose their jobs. Sanofi reps will lose their jobs also. Nice job with your crack legal team too. Dumb fucks go to a jury trial. Regeneron would of been better off calling "Better call Saul" from Breaking Bad for legal advice. Feb 21st will be a slaughter.
 






You sound like one of sharp leaders in medical science department who thought it was fine to violate a patent . Regeneron totally fucked this up with arrogance and incompetence. It's bad enough Sanofi has carried you since launch as your salesforce had no Cardiology experience. Let's see what did you contribute !! The Hub!!! And you couldn't of fucked that up anymore if you tried . This drug is gone and many people will lose their jobs. Sanofi reps will lose their jobs also. Nice job with your crack legal team too. Dumb fucks go to a jury trial. Regeneron would of been better off calling "Better call Saul" from Breaking Bad for legal advice. Feb 21st will be a slaughter.

Everything you say is 100% accurate but Praluent will not be pulled, RELAX!!
 






Are you kidding me? Sanofi is the worst sales force. Your so called relationships amounted to nothing. You have no biologics experience and tried to sell this like a pill. Do us a favor and Stay on your own board. By the way, it's not "would of". It's would have. It's called a verb.
 


















Are you kidding me? Sanofi is the worst sales force. Your so called relationships amounted to nothing. You have no biologics experience and tried to sell this like a pill. Do us a favor and Stay on your own board. By the way, it's not "would of". It's would have. It's called a verb.

Listen up you little fuck dweeb. You don't know the first thing about me. But you keep at it Mr. Einstein vocabulary spell checker. Go wipe some leftovers will ya'?......yes, it's "ya'" and not you, so go and fuck off
 




































Where's your proof of this?

Good enough for you:
Case: 17-1480 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2017

NOTE: Thisorderisnonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________
AMGEN INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING LIMITED, AMGEN USA, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

SANOFI, AVENTISUB LLC, REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC,Defendants-Appellants ______________________

2017-1480

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:14-cv-01317-SLR, 1:14-cv- 01349-SLR, 1:14-cv-01393-SLR, and 1:14-cv-01414-SLR, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

______________________
ON MOTION ______________________

Before DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Case: 17-1480 Document: 59 Page: 2 Filed: 02/08/2017

2

AMGEN INC. v. SANOFI

The appellants move to stay, pending appeal, the injunction ordered by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, which becomes effective on February 21, 2017. The appellees oppose the motion. Various physicians also move for leave to file amicus curiae briefs in support of the motion to stay.

Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Proce- dure authorizes this court to grant a stay of an injunction pending appeal. Our determination is governed by four factors, the first two of which are the most critical: (1) whether the movant has made a strong showing of likeli- hood of success on the merits; (2) whether the movant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009).

Without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of this case by a merits panel, we conclude based upon the pa- pers submitted that a stay is warranted here.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to stay the injunction pending appeal is granted.

(2) All other pending motions are denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

page2image14880

s31
 


















Hey, great news! I'll be the first one to agree Regeneron employs a bunch of arrogant, incompetent, hubris ridden morons in leadership.

In this case, we delivered in keeping Praluent on the market for an additional 12-18 more months.

At least it buys time to reallocate our sales force.

Good job Regeneron/Sanofi!