I interviewed for a senior level sales position with BV earlier this week. After the interview, I was excited about the possibility of joining the company, but the next day I met a former member of the BV management team who was interviewing for a position with my current company. She cautioned me about potentially joining the organization based on a number of different factors.
She told me the there was a complete overhaul of senior management ever since EW took over management from S&N. She said the company had terminated a CEO, 2 VPs of sales, 2 RVPs of sales (1 U/S, 1 other), several directors of sales, a director of sales support, a large number of sales reps, a VP of marketing, several directors of marketing, a CFO, a controller, several members of the finance team, two VPs of payer relations, an interim head of payer relations, several payer relations managers, a VP of r&d, several r&d directors. She also mentioned they were thinking about getting rid of the sales force and going to a distributor model and were looking at outsourcing a number of the support functions although she wasn’t’ specific about the particular areas. She also said all of this had happened within a two year window and those people who were fired without cause were not given the severance packages they were promised with S&N (1 month for every year of service). If this last item is true, I hope someone will confirm it for me, so I won’t waste any more time. If you fire people without cause, you have a moral obligation to do what you promised!!!
Initially I thought all of this surely couldn’t be true, but then I started reading this board, and a lot of it appears to be factual. She mentioned the only two members of senior management who were still in their positions were the VPs of HR and IT. With all of this said, can someone tell me if there is any stability in this company? If all of this is true, it makes the company look like a train wreck. Surely all of these people could not have been incompetent or immoral or lazy, right?
Next I was told there were no new products and the U/S product was extremely difficult to sell. I was told non-sales management had no clear understanding of just how different the sales conversation for U/S was compared to the other two products. I was also told the internal reimbursement group had a very adversarial relationship with the sales team. Based on what I’ve read on this board the sales quotas for U/S are probably unrealistic and it sounds like EW is going to refuse to acquire any new products unless U/S meets/beats quota. The last time I checked sales is the lifeblood of any business and based on what I’m reading on this board it sounds like both sales leadership and your executive team are somewhat clueless.
Finally, I can’t imagine any possible scenario where EW has increased the long-term value of this company for any type of potential sale. It sounds like EW is stripping all costs to maintain the bottom line for a potential sale, but don’t they realize any potential buyer will discover all of the above during the due diligence process and will then walk away unless the business is being unloaded at a bottom feeder price? Surely your current CFO and CEO aren't this dumb and shortsighted, are they?
With all of this said, can somebody please separate the fact from the fiction for me concerning the above statements? I don’t know that the company will call me back for the next round of interviews, but I would still appreciate a timely response so if I do receive a call, I can respond appropriately.