Pfizer merger?

where is the market genius? Please post out how many shares outstanding for each, then the EPS for each.

aside from that, share price is ONLY a reflection of expectations relative to guidance, it not an objective standard like a 90 share price would be an A, 80-89 would be B..whist would suggest that share price of $65 or below would be a failing company.

A $45 per share company doesn't have twice the market cap of a $22.50 share comapny..How many shares are there? Duh. Then of course, you also have to factor indebt (bonds, etc), and the expected viability of CONTINUED operations..that is, for example, maybe a company with lost a revenue stream due to patent cliff. Etc.

Open a finance book son. Besides, no matter what happens, you get nothing zero nada UNLESS you have vested stock options. THAT is where the $ is.

You're perseverating.
 




where is the market genius? Please post out how many shares outstanding for each, then the EPS for each.

aside from that, share price is ONLY a reflection of expectations relative to guidance, it not an objective standard like a 90 share price would be an A, 80-89 would be B..whist would suggest that share price of $65 or below would be a failing company.

A $45 per share company doesn't have twice the market cap of a $22.50 share comapny..How many shares are there? Duh. Then of course, you also have to factor indebt (bonds, etc), and the expected viability of CONTINUED operations..that is, for example, maybe a company with lost a revenue stream due to patent cliff. Etc.

Open a finance book son. Besides, no matter what happens, you get nothing zero nada UNLESS you have vested stock options. THAT is where the $ is.

You better worry about finding a new job ya dweeb. your 2 cent anonymous market knowledge ain`t gonna help you.
 








Uhhh, no. Because (as other posters have pointed out) absolute share price isn't much of an indicator of a company's value. That you seem to be fixed on this one number, as opposed to market cap or P/E ratio suggests that you are either deluded or have an Asperger's like fascination with closing share price. In other words, you have demonstrated that you are completely incapable of understanding even rudimentary financial analysis. You clearly are ready to launch your own financial advisory website.

I only posted you were factually wrong in your assertion. My post accurately called out your inaccuracy about share prices. I've proffered no opinion on the mish-mash of crap you posted above as it has no relevance to my narrow comment on your factually incorrect post stating

"Holy crap, what a brain washed sh!t brain. You actually think $43 is good? Good compared to what....... most other pharma companies are in 60`s,70`s & 80`s."

You brought other pharma company share prices into the conversation and 60's, 70's & 80's for most pharma companies are what YOU asserted for most of them and it just ain't so bozo. Sorry.

By the way, not an employee of BMS nor would I recommend purchase of shares at current price if I was launching my own financial advisory service. I just hate it when people can't get their facts right.
 




I only posted you were factually wrong in your assertion. My post accurately called out your inaccuracy about share prices. I've proffered no opinion on the mish-mash of crap you posted above as it has no relevance to my narrow comment on your factually incorrect post stating

"Holy crap, what a brain washed sh!t brain. You actually think $43 is good? Good compared to what....... most other pharma companies are in 60`s,70`s & 80`s."

You brought other pharma company share prices into the conversation and 60's, 70's & 80's for most pharma companies are what YOU asserted for most of them and it just ain't so bozo. Sorry.

By the way, not an employee of BMS nor would I recommend purchase of shares at current price if I was launching my own financial advisory service. I just hate it when people can't get their facts right.

Obviously another shit canned rep who Bms punted out and has never gotten over it. Nobody cares about loserville ya bum.
 




I only posted you were factually wrong in your assertion. My post accurately called out your inaccuracy about share prices. I've proffered no opinion on the mish-mash of crap you posted above as it has no relevance to my narrow comment on your factually incorrect post stating

"Holy crap, what a brain washed sh!t brain. You actually think $43 is good? Good compared to what....... most other pharma companies are in 60`s,70`s & 80`s."

You brought other pharma company share prices into the conversation and 60's, 70's & 80's for most pharma companies are what YOU asserted for most of them and it just ain't so bozo. Sorry.

By the way, not an employee of BMS nor would I recommend purchase of shares at current price if I was launching my own financial advisory service. I just hate it when people can't get their facts right.

You make me smile. You've managed to convince every responder that you're clueless, but god bless, you keep reaching for a Blue's clue. At first I thought you were just annoying, but while yes, you are annoying, you're amusing too- it's like watching a third rate stand up comedian bomb on YouTube, painful but funny. At first you feel bad for him, but he's so obnoxious that you start rooting for the hecklers. You go girl!
 




You better worry about finding a new job ya dweeb. your 2 cent anonymous market knowledge ain`t gonna help you.

Poor fool you are to critique someone's deeper knowledge of the financial markets. I don't work for your company, never did. Spouse was a rep at another company, downsized and been in another industry for 5 years. I make my $$ off of the schlepping you and your handcuffed peers do every day.
 




Poor fool you are to critique someone's deeper knowledge of the financial markets. I don't work for your company, never did. Spouse was a rep at another company, downsized and been in another industry for 5 years. I make my $$ off of the schlepping you and your handcuffed peers do every day.

Of course. Only successful and highly compensated professionals who are not in Pharma take time out of there busy days to post shit on a Pharma blog site. You are a shining star and anyone who doubts that is foolish. LMFAO
 




Of course. Only successful and highly compensated professionals who are not in Pharma take time out of there busy days to post shit on a Pharma blog site. You are a shining star and anyone who doubts that is foolish. LMFAO

LOL..welcome back. Just watching my investments. I play the stock options around your company and 3 others.
 




LOL..welcome back. Just watching my investments. I play the stock options around your company and 3 others.

Uh, OK, you can be whatever you want on this anoymous site. most people like you are NEVER pharma reps though when you post. Try a little harder next time to be something better, you num nut.
 




Poor fool you are to critique someone's deeper knowledge of the financial markets. I don't work for your company, never did. Spouse was a rep at another company, downsized and been in another industry for 5 years. I make my $$ off of the schlepping you and your handcuffed peers do every day.

How do you like working for Dunkin Donuts? Do you have to pay or your own hair nets?
 




No I do not work at a donut shop. I am The Most Intresting Man in the World.

The police often question me just because they find me interesting.
I am left-handed and right-handed.
My shirts never wrinkle.
I live vicariously through myself
I once had an awkward moment, just to see how it feels.
Cuba imports cigars from me . Mosquitos refuse to bite me purely out of respect. In museums, I am allowed to touch the art.
My business card says "I'll call you."

Keep selling my friends, keep selling.
 




No I do not work at a donut shop. I am The Most Intresting Man in the World.

The police often question me just because they find me interesting.
I am left-handed and right-handed.
My shirts never wrinkle.
I live vicariously through myself
I once had an awkward moment, just to see how it feels.
Cuba imports cigars from me . Mosquitos refuse to bite me purely out of respect. In museums, I am allowed to touch the art.
My business card says "I'll call you."

Keep selling my friends, keep selling.

Excellent !!!!!
Certainly more interesting and useful than 99% of the drivel usually on here.
Thank you my friend....
Stay thirsty.
 
























Just checking- saw it on pfizer site

Doubt it. Merck and Pfizer partnership on diabetes drug -

Forbes, 4/29/13

Earlier today, Pfizer and Merck announced a new partnership in the area of diabetes drug research. The companies will join forces to develop and commercialize ertugliflozin (PF-04971729), an oral sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitor for type 2 diabetes which is about to begin phase 3 studies. SGLT2 inhibitors are a new class of antidiabetic drugs, the first of which, J&J’s Invokana (generic name: canagliflozin), was approved by the FDA on March 29th. This is a very competitive field of research as evidenced by the number of companies with compounds in late development, including Lilly/Boehringer’s empagliflozin (NDA filed), Bristol-Myers/AstraZeneca’s dapagliflozin (phase 3) and Astellas’ ipragliflozin (filed in Japan).