• Mon news: Ventyx gets boost from Sanofi. PhRMA IRA legal challenge gets new life. AZ breast cancer drug disappoints. Teva’s once-monthly schizophrenia med. AZ gets FDA approval for first self-administered flu vaccine. See more on our front page

Novartis pays $3.5 Billion for Chinook

anonymous

Guest
It looks like Novartis spent $3.5 billion dollars to buy a company that manufactures specialized treatments.

I'm old enough to remember when they spent $9 billion dollars on a company that manufactures specialized treatments, and they immediately drove the division off a cliff.

Hired clueless, incompetent retreads to run things, did not invest in sales data, did not invest appropriately in acquisition channels, tried to give the product away to cover-up for their abysmal sales numbers, and fired all the systems of care teams after fifteen months to try to save a few bucks.

Here is a thought: since Duane, Vicky, Sandeep and Jeff have done such a remarkable job with Leqvio, why not bring them over and have them launch the Chinook products?

What could go wrong? Novartis clearly has confidence in these buffoons; after all, they are still here. Since they knocked Leqvio out of the park, why not hand them the next billion-dollar compound and let them achieve the same level of success they have in the ASCVD space?
 

<







Could care less about this purchase because any job opportunities with this new purchase will go to external hires. Novartis doesn’t care about its current employees or opportunities for career development… so why be interested.
 




I would love to hear some thoughts from the people who are interviewing for rare renal positions or have experience in rare disease regarding this purchase
There’s not a stronger group in this industry for BD and strategy discussions than pharma reps. Excited for the pontificating on lifecycle management
 




Could care less about this purchase because any job opportunities with this new purchase will go to external hires. Novartis doesn’t care about its current employees or opportunities for career development… so why be interested.
another moron rep

one couldn't care less
  1. INFORMAL
    used to express complete indifference
 








There’s not a stronger group in this industry for BD and strategy discussions than pharma reps. Excited for the pontificating on lifecycle management

Fore sure experienced pharma reps would not buy a 20 years old Abbott drug, ABT-627, that failed in blood pressure, prostate cancer, had safety issues in subgroups of diabetic nephropathy....and the rest of portfolio is comparable crap offloaded by a near bancruptcy biotech and Bayer/Ionis, but at least the last one fits to our RNA expertise. Anyway, are there any unknown issues with iptacopan for such a desperate move?
 








Fore sure experienced pharma reps would not buy a 20 years old Abbott drug, ABT-627, that failed in blood pressure, prostate cancer, had safety issues in subgroups of diabetic nephropathy....and the rest of portfolio is comparable crap offloaded by a near bancruptcy biotech and Bayer/Ionis, but at least the last one fits to our RNA expertise. Anyway, are there any unknown issues with iptacopan for such a desperate move?
OMG! Where were you when Vas needed this?
 




Fore sure experienced pharma reps would not buy a 20 years old Abbott drug, ABT-627, that failed in blood pressure, prostate cancer, had safety issues in subgroups of diabetic nephropathy....and the rest of portfolio is comparable crap offloaded by a near bancruptcy biotech and Bayer/Ionis, but at least the last one fits to our RNA expertise. Anyway, are there any unknown issues with iptacopan for such a desperate move?
What’s the PTRS on some of the assets? Projected CAGR?
 




Fore sure experienced pharma reps would not buy a 20 years old Abbott drug, ABT-627, that failed in blood pressure, prostate cancer, had safety issues in subgroups of diabetic nephropathy....and the rest of portfolio is comparable crap offloaded by a near bancruptcy biotech and Bayer/Ionis, but at least the last one fits to our RNA expertise. Anyway, are there any unknown issues with iptacopan for such a desperate move?

I thought the same thing - some unknown issues
 




Fore sure experienced pharma reps would not buy a 20 years old Abbott drug, ABT-627, that failed in blood pressure, prostate cancer, had safety issues in subgroups of diabetic nephropathy....and the rest of portfolio is comparable crap offloaded by a near bancruptcy biotech and Bayer/Ionis, but at least the last one fits to our RNA expertise. Anyway, are there any unknown issues with iptacopan for such a desperate move?

Ask the shortsellers, some still stick to their rationales. And share price of Novartis already down despite Kisqali euphoria! Iptacopan in most indications slower recruitment than expected.
 








Could care less about this purchase because any job opportunities with this new purchase will go to external hires. Novartis doesn’t care about its current employees or opportunities for career development… so why be interested.


Ugh, the whiny internal hire person again. No company cares about you. Get over it. Plus, there won’t be any additional roles. The drugs will get sold by the renal rare team that’s being hired now.
 




Grammar police. On Cafepharma.
What a twat.
27481da1-637b-40b2-89d2-7673cc2c6b9d