So did you bother to read the lawsuit (or even just the headings) or do you have a reading comprehension problem. Castle is the plaintiff. Because I can't assume you understand that, it means Castle filed the suit... Therefore this is not a lawsuit against them. Please use that "little gumption" @ then enlighten us with real factual info that you find. After reading all this bs talk of lawsuits on this board, I have searched to no avail. Lawsuits are actually filed with courts & therefore able to find/read (such as the one mentioned above). Complaints are just that, a complaint sent in to corporate to be answered. I am not assuming, nor did I say Castle hasn't settled complaints. I have no way of knowing. I simply said, if castle were doing the things attributed to them in the quoted post, one could find evidence, not anonymous rants of "lawsuits are being filed", " I heard a rep..."... Cafepharma rhetoric... Again, this is not a unique claim to Castle but the same bs on just about every other cafepharma board.
"Not everyone wants 'the money', we want Cannons upheld"... Give me a break!
And of course I am Robbie or DVP or ... Because only they could have a difference of opinion with you? Everytime I have read a post that is anything but completely negative on any of these cafepharma boards, the poster is attacked & attributed to management. Instead of the childish attributing (we are all anonymous) or deflecting with mean spirited personal attacks making you seam petty & irrelevant as well as invalidating any argument you presume to have, why not just discuss the points brought up.
