Merck's Future?

Quote
















Merck does not have to wear shades...IYKWIM

And yes, plans have been drawn out for WP and UG closure and revealed to certain MMD groups. My bud if trying to figure when he should jump ship.
 




This entire thread is absolute and utter bullshit, don't belive any of it. Easy to come on an Internet forum anonymously and spread fear mongering horse shit , probably one of the Wharton School geniuses who has led Merck to greatness over the past ten years.
 








Anonymous said:
What is going on in Upper Gwynedd? Is that going to close, too?

Is West Point PA really closing?
Click to expand...

All depends on our consumer care offer next week. Say we get 12 billion, Kenny gets 10 and the company gets two. Sell assets and fire people = company stays afloat and shareholders are happy. Fairly simple equation.
 








Anonymous said:
All depends on our consumer care offer next week. Say we get 12 billion, Kenny gets 10 and the company gets two. Sell assets and fire people = company stays afloat and shareholders are happy. Fairly simple equation.
Click to expand...

It's the right thing to do. Sigma clearly states that if you can't be 1 or 2 in a sector, there is no need to be there. Outsourcing is good for shareholders. We work for the shareholders.
 




Anonymous said:
This entire thread is absolute and utter bullshit, don't belive any of it. Easy to come on an Internet forum anonymously and spread fear mongering horse shit , probably one of the Wharton School geniuses who has led Merck to greatness over the past ten years.
Click to expand...

It's been 2 years, not 10. No fear, just facts. Don't worry about others. Do your job well and be happy. Upper management is a friend to all.
 




Anonymous said:
It's the right thing to do. Sigma clearly states that if you can't be 1 or 2 in a sector, there is no need to be there. Outsourcing is good for shareholders. We work for the shareholders.
Click to expand...

There's absolutely nothing in the SS methodology about "unless 1 or 2 in a sector, there is no need to be there."

If outsourcing is so good for shareholders, then why is Merck, the greatest outsourcer in the world, up 25% over the last 10 years, while the DJIA is up 60%?

The winners in outsourcing are the outsourcing providers themselves (and THEIR shareholders.)
 




Anonymous said:
There's absolutely nothing in the SS methodology about "unless 1 or 2 in a sector, there is no need to be there."

If outsourcing is so good for shareholders, then why is Merck, the greatest outsourcer in the world, up 25% over the last 10 years, while the DJIA is up 60%?

The winners in outsourcing are the outsourcing providers themselves (and THEIR shareholders.)
Click to expand...

I will help:
Don't care about 10 years. Only care about the last 2. Don't bother me.
Read and get a belt in SS. Then get back to me. Until then don't bother me. You're just being stupid.
We don't outsource a lot relative to what we should be doing. That will change over time. We need to keep the stock price up. There is still plenty of runway to do so.

Outsourcer is not a word. It's ok not to be the sharpest tool in the shed. Just know your place.
 
















Anonymous said:
It's the right thing to do. Sigma clearly states that if you can't be 1 or 2 in a sector, there is no need to be there. Outsourcing is good for shareholders. We work for the shareholders.
Click to expand...

You clearly don't understand Sigma as practice by Merck.

Merck Sigma clearly states that if it can't fit on one slide, it doesn't matter. Probably explains vaccine production optimization in West Point...
 
















Top Bottom
Back
Quote