Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
What I find interesting is that despite this "bad economy", restaurants all over are bustling, dept stores / malls are crowded (even on a weekday during work hours), people are not just looking, but buying...movie theatres are doing well....so people have money to dump....but when it comes to their prescriptions, they want it all for nothing.
This post may be the most important one in this thread.
It is true that innovation drives profitability and Merck is sorely lacking in innovation today. But when the liberal ideologue Ken Frasier stands up in front of the company during an employee business brief and whines about the unsustainable cost of medicine, it is time to find a new job. He doesn't even understand the cost model of medicine.
Merck's liberal loser leaders whine about making tough business decisions, focusing on core strategies, and then pour many hundred millions of dollars into "green" energy projects like stupid solar panels on garages and fuel cells. How easy and convenient it is to attend sniffy cocktail parties as the multimillionaire tick on the dog and hold forth on ridiculous socialist tripe while the dog suffers from a preventable illness that is becoming terminal.
It is time for this industry to repudiate this line of thinking and ask the hard questions posed by the above poster. Discretionary income is by definition DISCRETIONARY. If people find buying a health preserving medicine to be more BORING than a new iPhone, premium cable, dining out, and re-upping on the Lexus lease, well, they can live by the consequences of their decision. Don't ask me to open my wallet for these losers.
I remember a recent picture of Michelle Obama in a soup kitchen serving meals to the "poor", while one of the "poor" took a picture of her on his Blackberry.
Pretty much sums up the state of AmeriKa.