LabCorp emplyoment application question: are you over 40?

Quote
Just seeing that question as part of an employment application just tells me what type of douchebags are running this organization. Life is to short to deal with junior league bullshit like that so I say FUCK YOU LAB CORP, I refuse to work for you! SUCK IT!
 






It is time to bring this to the media!!!!!!!

Enough is enough LabCrap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear when your EEO job application questions are shown to the general public on the 6:00 News/Websites!!!!!!!

Fuck You!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 












As a hiring manager for this company and other large national corporations, I can honestly say Ive never seen an employment application for a candidate I was interviewing... I go off resume only.
 


















Still no answer you lying Goy fuck!!!!!!!

Doesn't matter the U.S. economy is in the fucking toilet and so is the pharma/medical industry!!!

Sooner or later they catch you lying cheating motherfuckers for Medicare/Medicaid fraud!

The only difference now is that they can arrest the managers and the reps as well!!!!

Check out this link you stupid Goyisha Shit-wads!!!!!

http://www.fbi.gov/fbi-search?cx=00...s-services/fbi-resources/&ie=UTF-8&q=medicare
 












Really???????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Looks like someone is under investigation again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LabCorp accused of Medicare fraud, under Senate investigation
November 11, 2011 5:43 PM
Michael D. Abernethy / Times-News
LabCorp is at the center of a Senate investigation to determine whether the Burlington-based laboratory testing company is one of several that might have cheated Medicare and Medicaid out of billions of dollars by rigging deals with insurance companies and doctors.

The allegations came this week as Senators Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., requested LabCorp, three major health insurance companies and one other lab company turn over copies of lab service agreements, contracts and other related documents.

In a news release, the senators expressed suspicion that LabCorp, Alamance County’s largest employer, and other medical companies are involved in “pull-through” schemes that guarantee insurance companies discounted lab rates in exchange for referrals. The inquiry questions whether federal health care programs Medicare and Medicaid were also overbilled by lab testing companies.

“A Medicaid fraud case in California that recently settled for $241 million involved allegations that a medical laboratory had overcharged the state’s insurance program as part of paying kickbacks to doctors and hospitals that referred patients to its labs,” the Senate Finance Committee’s release said.

Members of LabCorp’s media relations office didn’t return calls about the inquiry by press time Friday.

LabCorp, Quest Diagnostics Inc., Cigna, Aetna Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Inc. were asked to turn over company documents, including detailed financial and lab records.

A copy of the letter sent from Grassley and Baucus to LabCorp CEO David King requests pricing schedules comparing the price per test for LabCorp’s 10 most common lab tests, with the price per test charged to each of the largest managed care organizations (insurance companies) and the Medicare payment per test.

The letter also requests copies of any documents submitted in response to subpoenas by the Attorney General of the State of California in response to “pull-through” practices and LabCorp’s revenue totals — including Medicare revenue as a share of total revenue, Medicaid revenue as a share of total revenue, commercial payor revenue as a share of total revenue and “all other” revenue as a share of total revenue.

The Senate request also references a lawsuit filed in New York, which alleges that LabCorp violated the federal Anti-Kickback law and overcharged Medicare and Medicaid.

The Anti-Kickback law forbids health care companies from directly or indirectly remunerating other parties to encourage them to order any service or item federal health care programs might pay for. Businesses violating the law can’t participate in the Medicare program.

The lawsuit — filed in August by Andrew Baker of NPT Associates, a lab company, on behalf of the federal government — accuses LabCorp of making a deal with UnitedHealth Group to provide cut-rate testing in exchange for becoming its exclusive in-network lab partner. The suit claims LabCorp charged UnitedHealth Group “one-third to one-half of the prices paid by Medicare for the same services” and as little as one-sixth of prices paid by private payors.

“These commercially unreasonable prices constituted remuneration paid to UnitedHealthcare in order to induce UnitedHealthcare to arrange for or recommend that their in-network physicians send their Medicare-reimbursable tests to (LabCorp),” the suit says.

The suit claims a 2007 contract between LabCorp and UnitedHealth Group stipulated that LabCorp would pay the insurance company up to $200 million during the first three years of the 10-year contract to cover any extra costs incurred by the insurer under the deal.

“LabCorp believed that the contract with UnitedHealthcare, including the expected ‘pull-through’ would generate additional revenues of $3 billion and that without the pull-through the contract would result in substantial losses,” the suit claims.

The suit also claims that Medicare reimbursement made up about $1 billion of its $5 billion annual intake in 2010.

The suit requests a jury trial to determine whether LabCorp was involved in Medicare fraud and asks for an injunction against LabCorp filing any more false claims with the government. The suit also requests that LabCorp repay the United States government damages equal to three times the amount the government sustained as well as substantial civil penalties.

LabCorp must respond to the suit by Nov. 17.

Racist Assholes!!!!!
 






Anonymous said:
Really???????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Looks like someone is under investigation again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LabCorp accused of Medicare fraud, under Senate investigation
November 11, 2011 5:43 PM
Michael D. Abernethy / Times-News
LabCorp is at the center of a Senate investigation to determine whether the Burlington-based laboratory testing company is one of several that might have cheated Medicare and Medicaid out of billions of dollars by rigging deals with insurance companies and doctors.

The allegations came this week as Senators Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., requested LabCorp, three major health insurance companies and one other lab company turn over copies of lab service agreements, contracts and other related documents.

In a news release, the senators expressed suspicion that LabCorp, Alamance County’s largest employer, and other medical companies are involved in “pull-through” schemes that guarantee insurance companies discounted lab rates in exchange for referrals. The inquiry questions whether federal health care programs Medicare and Medicaid were also overbilled by lab testing companies.

“A Medicaid fraud case in California that recently settled for $241 million involved allegations that a medical laboratory had overcharged the state’s insurance program as part of paying kickbacks to doctors and hospitals that referred patients to its labs,” the Senate Finance Committee’s release said.

Members of LabCorp’s media relations office didn’t return calls about the inquiry by press time Friday.

LabCorp, Quest Diagnostics Inc., Cigna, Aetna Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Inc. were asked to turn over company documents, including detailed financial and lab records.

A copy of the letter sent from Grassley and Baucus to LabCorp CEO David King requests pricing schedules comparing the price per test for LabCorp’s 10 most common lab tests, with the price per test charged to each of the largest managed care organizations (insurance companies) and the Medicare payment per test.

The letter also requests copies of any documents submitted in response to subpoenas by the Attorney General of the State of California in response to “pull-through” practices and LabCorp’s revenue totals — including Medicare revenue as a share of total revenue, Medicaid revenue as a share of total revenue, commercial payor revenue as a share of total revenue and “all other” revenue as a share of total revenue.

The Senate request also references a lawsuit filed in New York, which alleges that LabCorp violated the federal Anti-Kickback law and overcharged Medicare and Medicaid.

The Anti-Kickback law forbids health care companies from directly or indirectly remunerating other parties to encourage them to order any service or item federal health care programs might pay for. Businesses violating the law can’t participate in the Medicare program.

The lawsuit — filed in August by Andrew Baker of NPT Associates, a lab company, on behalf of the federal government — accuses LabCorp of making a deal with UnitedHealth Group to provide cut-rate testing in exchange for becoming its exclusive in-network lab partner. The suit claims LabCorp charged UnitedHealth Group “one-third to one-half of the prices paid by Medicare for the same services” and as little as one-sixth of prices paid by private payors.

“These commercially unreasonable prices constituted remuneration paid to UnitedHealthcare in order to induce UnitedHealthcare to arrange for or recommend that their in-network physicians send their Medicare-reimbursable tests to (LabCorp),” the suit says.

The suit claims a 2007 contract between LabCorp and UnitedHealth Group stipulated that LabCorp would pay the insurance company up to $200 million during the first three years of the 10-year contract to cover any extra costs incurred by the insurer under the deal.

“LabCorp believed that the contract with UnitedHealthcare, including the expected ‘pull-through’ would generate additional revenues of $3 billion and that without the pull-through the contract would result in substantial losses,” the suit claims.

The suit also claims that Medicare reimbursement made up about $1 billion of its $5 billion annual intake in 2010.

The suit requests a jury trial to determine whether LabCorp was involved in Medicare fraud and asks for an injunction against LabCorp filing any more false claims with the government. The suit also requests that LabCorp repay the United States government damages equal to three times the amount the government sustained as well as substantial civil penalties.

LabCorp must respond to the suit by Nov. 17.

Racist Assholes!!!!!
Click to expand...

Well, they managed to get their response date pushed back to Feb. 22. http://www.thetimesnews.com/articles/judge-50758-deadlines-labcorp.html
Funny... I seem to remember undergoing compliance-training which specifically covered these type of issues. Hmmmm.....
 












Gee!!!

Looks like I was not "off my meds"!!!

Get the butt plugs ready cause the Feds don't back off!!! Even if you settle this case, they will still be monitoring your dated crooked good old boy shit hole of a company for the next 10 years!!!!
No one gives a flying f__K (especially the government) if you provide more minimum wage jobs for the lowlifes of NC than anyone else!!!!!!

By the way as I stated earlier, you poor schmucks who bribed your physicians with discount lab rates will be looking at a few years in the can as well along your goat humping manager/CEO buddies!!!!

Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Enjoy those stainless steel toilet seats and daily metal food trays of slop!!!!

Not to mention the nightly ass poking in your cell and shower!!!!!!

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH!!!! That's gonna hurt!!!!!!!
 






Look, DK surrounds himself with other attorneys who lie, cheat and scam. He is the KING of it, and quite frankly....has gotten away with it for years! He could care less! He and all of his buddies have cashed in and made plenty of money. Looks as though there have been many internal whistleblowers throughout the years, only to have their cases dismissed by lazy federal judges who are by the way....judges for LIFE. Thats right, they can dismiss cases even with merrit and guess what...... they still have a job. Federal judges are apointed by our President. Need I say more???

There have been many employees, familes, patients, parents, grandparents, children, etc....screwed by this company and DK.
 












Anonymous said:
The suit claims a 2007 contract between LabCorp and UnitedHealth Group stipulated that LabCorp would pay the insurance company up to $200 million during the first three years of the 10-year contract to cover any extra costs incurred by the insurer under the deal.
Click to expand...

Whoa, if this is true, somebody belongs in prison. It's not a kickback if upper management does it?
 






Yep! I know the difference!

Do you know the different between dog-shit and Labcorp?

Not a blessed thing!

Enjoy your upcoming lay-offs, fines and prison sentences!

You arrogant crooked schmucks!
 






Enjoy!!!!!

The Senate request also references a lawsuit filed in New York, which alleges that LabCorp violated the federal Anti-Kickback law and overcharged Medicare and Medicaid.

The Anti-Kickback law forbids health care companies from directly or indirectly remunerating other parties to encourage them to order any service or item federal health care programs might pay for. Businesses violating the law can’t participate in the Medicare program.

The lawsuit — filed in August by Andrew Baker of NPT Associates, a lab company, on behalf of the federal government — accuses LabCorp of making a deal with UnitedHealth Group to provide cut-rate testing in exchange for becoming its exclusive in-network lab partner. The suit claims LabCorp charged UnitedHealth Group “one-third to one-half of the prices paid by Medicare for the same services” and as little as one-sixth of prices paid by private payors.

“These commercially unreasonable prices constituted remuneration paid to UnitedHealthcare in order to induce UnitedHealthcare to arrange for or recommend that their in-network physicians send their Medicare-reimbursable tests to (LabCorp),” the suit says.

The suit claims a 2007 contract between LabCorp and UnitedHealth Group stipulated that LabCorp would pay the insurance company up to $200 million during the first three years of the 10-year contract to cover any extra costs incurred by the insurer under the deal.

“LabCorp believed that the contract with UnitedHealthcare, including the expected ‘pull-through’ would generate additional revenues of $3 billion and that without the pull-through the contract would result in substantial losses,” the suit claims.

The suit also claims that Medicare reimbursement made up about $1 billion of its $5 billion annual intake in 2010.

The suit requests a jury trial to determine whether LabCorp was involved in Medicare fraud and asks for an injunction against LabCorp filing any more false claims with the government. The suit also requests that LabCorp repay the United States government damages equal to three times the amount the government sustained as well as substantial civil penalties.
 


















Top Bottom
Back
Quote