anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
This is very true. These massive layoffs are not managed by local management or company human resource departments and has nothing to do with performance. This layoff is about cost cutting and will be done by a non biased contract company who specializes in these types of restructurings. They realize that there is bias in allowing local management to influence who goes and who stays and those biases lead to lawsuits. This one will be strictly by the numbers with no interest in anything other than cost cutting and getting the numbers right.
Can't see it. People talk. People know who got a 1 or a 2 last year. If people stay when others received a 3 or 4 and got let go, there are two things to think about.
1) why even have a year end rating system?
2) why wouldn't that person that got let go sue if their counterpart/ or some one close by in another geography was kept and they had a year or two of worse ratings? Would appear to be a wrongful termination suit.