Is it worth it?


anonymous

Guest
Debating joining. Hearing mixed reviews. This is the 3rd time they’ve reached out to me and I’m actually thinking about it long and hard. Are they really that corrupt? Feedback on culture? Their reps seem to be mediocre with likely fewer alternatives. Any insider knowledge?
 
Debating joining. Hearing mixed reviews. This is the 3rd time they’ve reached out to me and I’m actually thinking about it long and hard. Are they really that corrupt? Feedback on culture? Their reps seem to be mediocre with likely fewer alternatives. Any insider knowledge?
Who are you getting your info from? Lol. Corrupt? If you’re from Natera and you’re calling BTO corrupt then this place isn’t for you. BTO has a super low turnover for a reason. The only people who quit just can’t perform or don’t want to be in the lab in general. If you’re thinking of joining, then join. And if you’re coming from Natera it will be like joining a company that actually cares about patients and isn’t being sued constantly for illegal billing practices.
 
I realize that sample size is hard for BTO people, but Natera sold more tests this quarter than BTO did in the past two years. Genetics billing is complex and when you do it properly it’s confusing to patients because insurance companies suck. As BTO follows the “just get the kit in and don’t worry about being in network or charging properly” thing that Progenity did to try to get volume it all comes around. Noticed that BTO is having a lot more billing issues these days. We hear it in the field. Sounds like someone is trying to avoid the Progenity trap….but that means pissed off patients and a whole lot of headache. Even better your billing message is a hot mess. Sounds like the reps don’t even know what it is.

Really excited about the Natera single gene…that should take a big enough bite that BTO and their lack of cash flow will need to go to the well again for another round of funding pushing that IPO back another year while you lose market share.

I would think twice about joining BTO just yet. They overpay base salaries have low growth goals for a reason. That’s why people don’t leave. It’s easy and you can make a little money. If they make it through the year unscathed after our army of reps rolls out a superior product with better technology and actual data behind it, then I would absolutely consider the jump. BUT that seems unlikely. Even if they can get a 14 gene version out in April (with zero data behind it)
 
I realize that sample size is hard for BTO people, but Natera sold more tests this quarter than BTO did in the past two years. Genetics billing is complex and when you do it properly it’s confusing to patients because insurance companies suck. As BTO follows the “just get the kit in and don’t worry about being in network or charging properly” thing that Progenity did to try to get volume it all comes around. Noticed that BTO is having a lot more billing issues these days. We hear it in the field. Sounds like someone is trying to avoid the Progenity trap….but that means pissed off patients and a whole lot of headache. Even better your billing message is a hot mess. Sounds like the reps don’t even know what it is.

Really excited about the Natera single gene…that should take a big enough bite that BTO and their lack of cash flow will need to go to the well again for another round of funding pushing that IPO back another year while you lose market share.

I would think twice about joining BTO just yet. They overpay base salaries have low growth goals for a reason. That’s why people don’t leave. It’s easy and you can make a little money. If they make it through the year unscathed after our army of reps rolls out a superior product with better technology and actual data behind it, then I would absolutely consider the jump. BUT that seems unlikely. Even if they can get a 14 gene version out in April (with zero data behind it)
Awwww hey Natera rep. Lol. Y’all are so funny.