anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
Let's all sing the "We are Lilly" song. It always brings a tear to my eye.
Let's all sing the "We are Lilly" song. It always brings a tear to my eye.
If you really want the truth, follow the money- find out how much we have to pay the PBMs in order to get covered on insurance at all.
Prices are raised because we can. Let them eat the crumbs!
Hmmm
Let's all sing the "We are Lilly" song. It always brings a tear to my eye.
Something doesn't make sense; press interviews people complaining about prices and yet this article states monthly cost was a lot less, $41 and now will be reduced even further to $25. They probably won't cover this though.
making pharma companies the punching bag for medical costs
Political Candidate on Insulin
Is that old son of a bitch still alive?Bernie just took a giant BM on Novo & Lilly
Smells like roses and honeysuckle
Breaking News - Pharma scolded on Capital Hill over Insulin
Look at the picture of the Representatives doing the scolding, two old farts!
Probably suffering from dementia, cranky their Depends are full during this long hearing.
Lilly like other companies has decided to charge 'what the market will bear' - in this case for insulin. I supposed this is what is taught nowadays in marketing class....but it is a huge mistake. A 'fair price' approach to products is really what motivates customer loyalty and long term success. But like so many bad decisions coming from Lilly leadership in the last 20 years (recall the 1.2B fine for off-label selling; the 2.2B write-off of PCS) the company now faces more scrutiny and reputation decline. And, there is no point in blaming PBMs or insurance companies or anyone else. Take a look at how Schwab rates Lilly - a 'C' rating....Autozone has a better rating. Abbott, Merck and, heck, every other pharma has out-paced Lilly. If Ricks follows the path of Sidney Terrell et al, who clearly was on another planet, Lilly may not even be 'C' rated.