How screwed up is OI becoming?













HALF OF PRODUCTION ARE r*****s FROM WHAT I AM TOLD BY OLDER SALES FOLKS.

THIS MAY BE THE ROOT OF SOME OF THE ISSUES?

No that is not it. We have no Leadership that is motivated. Production has nothing to do with it. Ask our customers and you will know. High turnover, expanded to quickly and with too many, customers are no longer loyal, some our but most are not, they used to be.
 












HALF OF PRODUCTION ARE r*****s FROM WHAT I AM TOLD BY OLDER SALES FOLKS.

THIS MAY BE THE ROOT OF SOME OF THE ISSUES?

Hilarious. I'm starting to think we have a professional shit-stirrer around hear. No posts on this thread for months. today theres six new ones on,the board trying to start something.
 






Hilarious. I'm starting to think we have a professional shit-stirrer around hear. No posts on this thread for months. today theres six new ones on,the board trying to start something.

I work at OI and read this about 1X per week for entertainment. Some employees were talking about something they read here two weeks ago and since then it seams a few more post than usual. 9 people were viewing this site on Monday at 7PM? The sales team seams bitter and without any clear leadership. Sales moral may take our company down for the count in time.
 






I work at OI and read this about 1X per week for entertainment. Some employees were talking about something they read here two weeks ago and since then it seams a few more post than usual. 9 people were viewing this site on Monday at 7PM? The sales team seams bitter and without any clear leadership. Sales moral may take our company down for the count in time.

Blame it on the bitter sales team. Nice.
 






I work at OI and read this about 1X per week for entertainment. Some employees were talking about something they read here two weeks ago and since then it seams a few more post than usual. 9 people were viewing this site on Monday at 7PM? The sales team seams bitter and without any clear leadership. Sales moral may take our company down for the count in time.

Seems. It's seems. Once I call it a typo ... but twice ...
 


















OI is broke and the state of MA is going to be screwed for handing them 13 million to buy two buildings to be held privatly by Geoff's trust.

Geoff had told the someone in the governors office that " we are months away from developing an artificial liver" a lie to solicit the states biotech grants.

an investigation has begun


Jail time will be coming soon
 






Geoff had told the someone in the governors office that " we are months away from developing an artificial liver" a lie to solicit the states biotech grants.

an investigation has begun


Jail time will be coming soon

How far from a solid growth and comp plan strategy other than what the Merck idiots broght in before a liver. How is the Roth still here anyway? Any department he takes over turns to shit. The East, comp plan, training...wtf he should have to start paying OI for restitution.
 












Obviously you were given misinformation as raises we're given along with bonuses. Do your homework!!!!

Wow Leadership Team - going back to a post from 3/29 to deflect the fact that your laid off 200 people at Christmas with no severance, laid off older employees only to give younger employees their jobs, and took big fat bonuses for yourself. I am in awe of your slickness!
 






Wow Leadership Team - going back to a post from 3/29 to deflect the fact that your laid off 200 people at Christmas with no severance, laid off older employees only to give younger employees their jobs, and took big fat bonuses for yourself. I am in awe of your slickness!

Hey know it all, I am not even part of the leadership team. Just clarifying that raises were given this year. Also more younger employees than older we're let go so again you are wrong!
 






Hey know it all, I am not even part of the leadership team. Just clarifying that raises were given this year. Also more younger employees than older we're let go so again you are wrong!

I did not imply that yearly merit increases were not given, I was stating that this was a reply to a post from March and the purpose of the reply was to deflect the fact that severance was not given (as reported in the press). Fact is where older employees were laid off because there was no position, that same position was filled by a younger employee.

Do you disagree that the VPs, directors, and managers should take a pay cut to save the company and jobs? I expect you do not and most likely management.
 






I did not imply that yearly merit increases were not given, I was stating that this was a reply to a post from March and the purpose of the reply was to deflect the fact that severance was not given (as reported in the press). Fact is where older employees were laid off because there was no position, that same position was filled by a younger employee.

Do you disagree that the VPs, directors, and managers should take a pay cut to save the company and jobs? I expect you do not and most likely management.

You called it correctly. The exec was using classic low grade diversion. Picking on an irrelevant fact (something from 9 months ago) to divert from issue at hand. The other point ignored, is that while they can and will claim more younger employees got let go, that is because there were more younger employees to begin with. As a %, excluding execs and friend of G and G (untouchables), older employees got hit more.
 






You called it correctly. The exec was using classic low grade diversion. Picking on an irrelevant fact (something from 9 months ago) to divert from issue at hand. The other point ignored, is that while they can and will claim more younger employees got let go, that is because there were more younger employees to begin with. As a %, excluding execs and friend of G and G (untouchables), older employees got hit more.

Not to mention managements family- also among the untouchables
 






I did not imply that yearly merit increases were not given, I was stating that this was a reply to a post from March and the purpose of the reply was to deflect the fact that severance was not given (as reported in the press). Fact is where older employees were laid off because there was no position, that same position was filled by a younger employee.

Do you disagree that the VPs, directors, and managers should take a pay cut to save the company and jobs? I expect you do not and most likely management.

Upper lever management will not voluntarily cut their salaries. What they will do is layoff more of the 35-55K salaries instead. HR will most likely destroy moral, culture and create nasty political clicks to make another 70 people just quit. The company has a dangerous long term debt right now without any means to pay it back. Long term suggestion is for everyone just to start looking for a new job. We have bad math with current pricing and things will be getting worse as competition increases in 2014.
 






Upper lever management will not voluntarily cut their salaries. What they will do is layoff more of the 35-55K salaries instead. HR will most likely destroy moral, culture and create nasty political clicks to make another 70 people just quit. The company has a dangerous long term debt right now without any means to pay it back. Long term suggestion is for everyone just to start looking for a new job. We have bad math with current pricing and things will be getting worse as competition increases in 2014.

Some of the better managers have told employees that they will be on they will be on the next round of layoffs in January so they have a little notice.