Here comes Hauser.

Well oh critical one. My point is he tries to do the FDA's job policing CRM industry manufacturers. Where he publicly feeds into an issue and makes its worse than it might be in the name of media coverage. He must not believe the FDA is capable. Is that clear enough?
 






Well oh critical one. My point is he tries to do the FDA's job policing CRM industry manufacturers. Where he publicly feeds into an issue and makes its worse than it might be in the name of media coverage. He must not believe the FDA is capable. Is that clear enough?

Not clear at all. Since Hauser can not approve products, issue warning letters or inspect manufacturing facilities, how is he doing the FDA's job. Show me 1 comment Hauser has made where he is doing the FDA's job. Again, your opinion doesn't matter. Show me facts, quotes, anything other than your silly, unfinished accusations.
 






Clarity is in the eye of the beholder. You may just not be as understanding of the facts over the past 10 years, so I will leave you to review and educate yourself. The last sentence was sarcasm which you obviously do not understand, due to your blinders being on a bit tight. Wake up, look around at the big picture. Its not just your version of logic centered around one mans opinion or editorials. The CRM world is larger than your or his opinion or suspicions. Thank him for believing he is doing the right thing. Maybe in his mind, its a public service. In mine, he wants to be the CRM police and I dont think the FDA nor the public need his input. Its like telling every citizen that if you have a permit to carry a concealed handgun, you can play cop. I want the FDA to do their job and make it well known that he does not control them or their actions. That may not be true, but we will scare the hell out of everybody anyway. Facts are facts, to those who choose to acknowledge such. Deal with it. Name calling is worthless and juvenile on CP. Im out.....peace
 






Clarity is in the eye of the beholder. You may just not be as understanding of the facts over the past 10 years, so I will leave you to review and educate yourself. The last sentence was sarcasm which you obviously do not understand, due to your blinders being on a bit tight. Wake up, look around at the big picture. Its not just your version of logic centered around one mans opinion or editorials. The CRM world is larger than your or his opinion or suspicions. Thank him for believing he is doing the right thing. Maybe in his mind, its a public service. In mine, he wants to be the CRM police and I dont think the FDA nor the public need his input. Its like telling every citizen that if you have a permit to carry a concealed handgun, you can play cop. I want the FDA to do their job and make it well known that he does not control them or their actions. That may not be true, but we will scare the hell out of everybody anyway. Facts are facts, to those who choose to acknowledge such. Deal with it. Name calling is worthless and juvenile on CP. Im out.....peace

You don't get it. Thank god you're the minority.
 












And if you are the "Dr. Hauser"? You can pound sand and continue to be a douche. Go practice cardiology and leave industry alone. They have enough challenges without you making your name in the paper this month on some witch hunt bs.....go mess with Obama and the medicare or something. Much bigger problems in the world for you to maintain your fame with.
 






And if you are the "Dr. Hauser"? You can pound sand and continue to be a douche. Go practice cardiology and leave industry alone. They have enough challenges without you making your name in the paper this month on some witch hunt bs.....go mess with Obama and the medicare or something. Much bigger problems in the world for you to maintain your fame with.

No thanks. I would rather just mess with you idiots until you appreciate the value I bring to industry to balance the unjust behavior of irresponsible device companies. Please know that Iam sought out to report these facts by family members and friends to generate these articles and retained by third party watchdog organizations to comment and study these issues.
 






Fair enough.....you are good at what you do. Its just that industry cant bear too many more of these hits. Its already having a declining effect on the companies, reps, doctors and not to mention the patients. Some people have had some bad events, no question. These events were not intentional, nor planned and usually good things come in the way of positive improvements learned from these experiences. Its just frustrating to see so many that are improved, healed or continue to live due to the technology that we work with. The low percentage or anomalies can be blown up in the public eye and where a small issue can scare the heck out of the public and create distrust. There is too much distrust in our industry and yes some of the companies can do a better job. I personally believe they are all scared now and looking for other ways to facilitate that revenue stream without the risk of investing in CRM. That is a shame.
 












Fair enough.....you are good at what you do. Its just that industry cant bear too many more of these hits. Its already having a declining effect on the companies, reps, doctors and not to mention the patients. Some people have had some bad events, no question. These events were not intentional, nor planned and usually good things come in the way of positive improvements learned from these experiences. Its just frustrating to see so many that are improved, healed or continue to live due to the technology that we work with. The low percentage or anomalies can be blown up in the public eye and where a small issue can scare the heck out of the public and create distrust. There is too much distrust in our industry and yes some of the companies can do a better job. I personally believe they are all scared now and looking for other ways to facilitate that revenue stream without the risk of investing in CRM. That is a shame.

The CRM industry "cant bear" the truth because it has got 34% SG&A and too many MBAs. If they were actually inventing and engineering they won't be in this mess. Just count the ratio of MBAs vs. non-MBA engineers, scientists etc. in what is supposed to be R&D.