Pure scum, why he's allowed to preach his hate and mobilized armies of crazies to do violent things is beyond me.
I'm sure it is seeing as how the stuff you say he does, he doesn't do.
I know what he actually espouses, do you? Do you listen to him, FREQUENTLY with your own ears or do you listen to what the whacko lefty sites SAY about him.
psyche! clearly hes jareds idol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQcvbw6ExTQ
You're right I don't listen to him but he did:
http://vodpod.com/watch/4646170-glenn-beck-teacher-to-california-killer
I'm not interested in what Beck is teaching to say the least.
This is where the conclowns come in to tell us about how fantastic Fox ratings are; because thats the only thing thats important.
But, did you know the NBPP had a guy standing in front of a polling place carrying a stick? THAT was violent intent, not what Beck said.
Where are the cons on this one?
Can you begin to even imagine if Keith Oblermann had said the exact same thing in reference to republiklans?
SPN . . . sbelle . . . Are you out there? What do you think of this vile comment from Glenn Beck?
Oh, I get it - When a FOX meat puppet says it, the cons ignore the comment and hope the issue goes away.
If a 'liberal' pundit says anything remotely close to what Beck said, the con outrage and phony indignation is spewed all over this board.
Bueller?
Beck
Fucking
OWNS
And that pisses you off. Doesn't it? Doesn't it? Oh yes it does.
![]()
So, now you advocate violent threats from right wing pundits like Beck?
YOU
Just
got
SHANKED (again).
Thanks for playing, punk.
Some of us have to work now and then you know.
I've stated before that I think Beck is absolutely nuts. He rants and raves and goes off on odd tangents and tries to connect things that just aren't even vaguely related. I would have to see his message in context, as the idea that you would have to shoot someone before they shoot you is nothing unacceptable, it's self defense, but he does sound like his normal irratic self and, in this out of context clip, the comment is atrocious. It might make more sense if I saw the entire rant but I doubt it and it likely is just as wrong.
Your indignation is misplaced though as libbies refuse to say anything negative about Olbermann who is just as rabid and nuts as Beck, just the opposite side of the coin. Most of you still claim libbies are always peaceful protesters which is sheer rubbish. So if you want to speak about phony outrage, look in the mirror.
I have pointed out the left's hatred in response to those who want to act like this kind of heated noise is just from the extreme right. The reality is, I have no big problem with what Beck or Olbermann says. They have the right to their views and I think it's healthy to expose the extremists on both sides. Most people reject extremism though and I don't think Beck or any of those on the extreme left, have been the cause of anyone doing anything. To think Palin or Beck, Maher or Olbermann, caused Tucson is as idiotic as those trying to connect MO's 'get moving' campaign with the rise in pedestrian fatalities.
RAB, I can't believe you are still defending the NBPP idiot. No matter how much you deny it, I person dressed in NBPP garb, carrying a weapon, has absolutely no business at a polling place. They are a radical, white hating group and you weaken your argument against Beck defending this nonsense. If this was a white supremacy group, they would have been tried and convicted. This was explicit voter intimidation and is far more serious than some pundit on the radio. There are laws against it, they just aren't applied when it is white hate in action.
RAB, there is little coherent in your response. To claim Beck incited these people to violence is as assinine as those who think video games caused Columbine. Just like the leftie media attempts to pull out a word here and there from Loughner's ramblings as 'proof' he was affiliated with or influenced by the tea party doesn't make it true.
There were black and white voters where the NBPP was stationed or do you think polling places are exclusively black or white? An armed, racist, hate group member has no business at a voting station. It is as inappropriate as placing a skin head or klansman there. You can dismiss this as 'clutching at pearls' but if the roles were reversed you would be screaming at the world. I know you refuse to see black hatred and black racism though so no matter what is shown to you, you will not see it.
People have the right to bear arms, even when the audience disagrees with the views of the speaker.
You're really reaching and you know it. I understand your desperation as libbies lose their socialistic stranglehold on washington.
If someone commits violence, they should be punished. If the family was so sure this man had lost his marbles after watching Beck, what did they do to intervene? What did they do to alert authorities, to get him help? Or is this just a way to be in the spotlight with their 15 minutes of fame? Hey, so called 'friends' of Loughner say he was far left. Are you buying it? You give Beck far too much credit for power over people.
There are explicit rules and regulations around polling places that do not apply to most other settings. These rules were broken but no one was held accountable. It is appalling that a group, labeled a hate group by the leftist splc, would be part of a national campaign to staff polling locations. No other hate group would have been dismissed as being 'no big deal'.
There are laws in each state that allows people to carry, carry concealed, whatever. Any speaker can book a venue and not allow firearms within the facility. They can't over rule public rules however, but if the carry laws feel threatening to them, they can find a venue where they can control the rules, even within the state in question. This does not hamper their ability to get the word out. A voter has no such ability to change or control the venue and must vote at a specific polling location. There are reasons why the rules around polling places are very explicit.