Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
wow, someone forgot to take their meds today?
tro·car (trkär)
n.
A sharp-pointed surgical instrument, used with a cannula to puncture a body cavity
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/trocar
LIke I said, a bunch of dumb fucks! Ass wipe thinks he knows everything, but in the end knows nothing.
You really are a dumbass. 3 of my hospitals have been approached by both Sterilmed and Ascent and in all instances the hospital said its not worth it because our trocars are the same amount or even less than what a reprocessing company would charge. Ask the doctors what they would rather use, something "cheap" that's new, or something thats been reprocessed and risks damaging the seal. Better yet moron, you tell me what you would rather have put in you? I'll take the cheap, new trocar all day long you troll
You listen here TS/SH/GJ/DG: you ass clowns hired us, so the blame is on you! Maybe if Applied a) made better products that didnt crack/break/fail or b) maybe if Applied paid its reps the industry average, then MAYBE you wouldn't be forced to hire ex pharma reps and could actually hire some halfway decent talent? Ever think of that douchebag?
Ding ding ding! Whose gonna get the last word in? The reps or the managers?
As an outsider I'm a bit confused. Applied is known as the cheapest in the industry. They are known for products that usually work but no bells and whistles. They rarely are the first to market with anything. Considering this is a 1 dimentional sale (cost), they don't need the most dynamic clinical reps. They need someone who can deliver a price quote and stand in the room during the trial. Surgeons don't demand Applied. They are asked to use it and hopefully they see it as indifferent vs JnJ or Cov.
With this said, why would you expect average pay? Not saying all Applied reps are below average, but that is what you should expect. How do you think Applied achieves it's low costs? Simple, by running a lean machine (which includes paying reps as little as possible). Up and comer's and poor reps are the Applied sales force. Which one are you?
To the guy who thinks he can stop his accts from reprocessing through fear tactics of "what if the patient knew" or "quality will be inferior". Ask JnJ and Cov how that strategy is working.
Not an RN or an OR mgr, just a 10 yr rep with the same call points as you. I've seen this industry evolve and perhaps I have finally gained some perspective.
From a big picture perspective this is simple supply and demand (of / for reps). JnJ and Covidien charge higher prices because they can. They can because of 2 reasons. 1. They innovate (arguably) more than applied. 2. Due to higher pay scales they can recruit more succesful reps (not always better - but better resume's). They don't run the same risk as applied towards bad hires.
These two things play off each other. By innovating they can get Dr's to demand product. And often times they have a better rep who can better generate interest. This provides the leverage to command higher prices.
This is not a rip on applied reps, just another way of stating the Applies sales force is either up and comers or poor reps. Good reps don't stay here due to the $.
So if Applied is cheap, does that mean JnJ and Cov are considered appropriate?
Why isn't Applied considered appropriate and JnJ and Cov are considered raping the ass of the customer?