Female Viagra rejected

Vagitarian

Vagitarian

Well-Known Member
Women should start writing in right now - then come the demonstrations.
We need to get this on the market by the time the 'Fifty Shades of Grey' movie comes out!
 






No surprise that this is the FDA's attitude and sadly it applies to drugs much more important than female Viagra, not that there's anything wrong with female Viagra.

As far as the FDA is concerned, I think their mandate should be reduced to ensuring safety. Not their business how well a drug works or what it's promoted for. That's for medical professionals and the medical marketplace to determine.
 




Man For All Seasons said:
No surprise that this is the FDA's attitude and sadly it applies to drugs much more important than female Viagra, not that there's anything wrong with female Viagra.

As far as the FDA is concerned, I think their mandate should be reduced to ensuring safety. Not their business how well a drug works or what it's promoted for. That's for medical professionals and the medical marketplace to determine.
Click to expand...

Safety only means generics get approved that may be therapeutically inert but harmless. But then you know that. That's a Communistic/ Socialistic point of view.
 




Vagitarian said:
Safety only means generics get approved that may be therapeutically inert but harmless. But then you know that. That's a Communistic/ Socialistic point of view.
Click to expand...


No it's the polar opposite of that. And apparently you can't stand success. I'm on your side on this one. I think the FDA has too much power and misuses it quite often to "protect" us from helpful or desired drugs.

Anyone who used a generic which did not have efficacy data is someone I wouldn't use a healthcare provider. I want drugs that are safe and effective, but that doesn't mean that the FDA has to be in on determining effectiveness.
 
Last edited by a moderator:








Man For All Seasons said:
No it's the polar opposite of that. And apparently you can't stand success. I'm on your side on this one. I think the FDA has too much power and misuses it quite often to "protect" us from helpful or desired drugs.

Anyone who used a generic which did not have efficacy data is someone I wouldn't use a healthcare provider. I want drugs that are safe and effective, but that doesn't mean that the FDA has to be in on determining effectiveness.
Click to expand...
Doctors have lost 90% of their power in deciding what a patient can get by Rx. Those decisions are now made State and federal governments, HMO/PPO formularies and greedy, profit driven pharmacists [chain AND independents].
 




Walking Eagle said:
Doctors have lost 90% of their power in deciding what a patient can get by Rx. Those decisions are now made State and federal governments, HMO/PPO formularies and greedy, profit driven pharmacists [chain AND independents].
Click to expand...

And I would add a suggestion. While working I always insisted on name brands. Since retiring, some name brands are now producing the generic which has been tested (ie, Protonix). The difference in price is important to a retiree but so is efficacy so here is my suggestion: - If a pharmacist tries to fill your Rx with a generic, ask for the name of the manufacturer - then research it. Then you can make an informed decision because his decision is totally profit driven.
 




Well shit I thought this was going to turn into a nice sex thread but you guys turned it into a discussion on the future of the doomed healthcare industry . OK so the assholes destroyed the finest healthcare system in the world and our industry.
So what about Female Viagra? can we get some traction? My women don't need it when they see me lick my eyebrows!
 




LEONIDAS said:
Well shit I thought this was going to turn into a nice sex thread but you guys turned it into a discussion on the future of the doomed healthcare industry . OK so the assholes destroyed the finest healthcare system in the world and our industry.
So what about Female Viagra? can we get some traction? My women don't need it when they see me lick my eyebrows!
Click to expand...

Not sure what is in it but I do know some docs Rx Viagra to women even though studies don't support it - theory is: increased blood flow below the belt, increased clit engorgement. Tried it, she didn't know the difference but then, like for you, sometimes a woman just needs a good tongue lashing!
 




Didn't work for my Wife. The good tonguing part, is spot on. The sweeter and juicier (my Baby tastes like Juicy Fruit Gum), the more thorough and enjoyable it is for the female. Guys, keep the upper lip as smooth as possible. The pre-lick shave should be very meticulous.
 




libluvsbukkake said:
Didn't work for my Wife. The good tonguing part, is spot on. The sweeter and juicier (my Baby tastes like Juicy Fruit Gum), the more thorough and enjoyable it is for the female. Guys, keep the upper lip as smooth as possible. The pre-lick shave should be very meticulous.
Click to expand...

Good to work on squirting too. And if they can 'O' and squirt at the same time, oh my god!
 








Drug Dumper said:
well, it certainly makes me get nekkid.
Click to expand...

Are we FINALLY getting to the bottom of the broken baby toe issue? (LOL!)

I suspected as such all along! Hey, have you seen that new tequila bottled in a ceramic skull? It's expensive, next test - is it good? Our little gang likes Patron & Don Julio. It's a coin toss. It also makes them get nekkid and do things they never thought they'd do. I get nekkid too but only drink fine wine so I get to remember all the naughty stuff we do. I have to remind them - lol!
 
















I like the Au Naturale essence of ground zero. A little pungent but not overwhelming...sort of of like a nice fillet. I dont like everything to smell like palmolive soap in the sweet spot. DD are you fully satisfied by Mr. Dump? it is reciprocal you know...and if fact obligatory!
 








  • ~T~   Dec 17, 2013 at 10:17: AM
Man For All Seasons said:
As far as the FDA is concerned, I think their mandate should be reduced to ensuring safety. Not their business how well a drug works or what it's promoted for. That's for medical professionals and the medical marketplace to determine.
Click to expand...

Short-sighted...my feathered friend. If effectiveness requires that someone ingest a drug (like flibanserin) for more than a month to receive its benefits and experiences nasty side effects as a result, effectiveness has everything to do with safety AND should be a central concern of the FDA.
 




~T~ said:
Short-sighted...my feathered friend. If effectiveness requires that someone ingest a drug (like flibanserin) for more than a month to receive its benefits and experiences nasty side effects as a result, effectiveness has everything to do with safety AND should be a central concern of the FDA.
Click to expand...

Like :)
 




You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back