----------------------
Interesting... Love the personal attacks! lol People who do that know they don't have a leg to stand on with their lame arguments. It is clear you don't get it! If you think your rudeness to me is endearing yourself to others who might think about using that knee...think again. This is how I was treated when the Conformis CR failed...... So it seems to be a company thing???? Rotation of the femoral implant was not something I did - it was the Conformis CR....I was treated, just like you have, that it was my fault then I was ignored hoping I would go away. Making a knee for/from a damaged bone is never a good idea... it spells failure...I suspect your rude anger comes from my post possibly impeding your income. Don't accuse or get rude unless you REALLY know all the facts.
I hope people at Conformis see your rude behavior... unless they feel this is how you treat people..... If so then things are worse than I thought....
It sounds like you don't fully understand the process of how the knee is created or what the scans accomplish in relation to "damaged bone". This is not your fault and should have been more accurately explained to you from the surgeon's end. If you're deformity was significant your surgeon should not have proceeded with the ConforMIS case as there is a recommended maximum range of varus/valgus/flexion contracture that should be respected with ConforMIS.
When you say "rotated" I am not sure if you mean the doctor rotated the femoral cut block and then made his/her bone cuts, thus placing the femur in external rotation when implanted - which is a no no for a ConforMIS implant and would cause cuts and a fit that doesn't match the iView; again the cuts are based on neutral implant placement. External rotation is common practice in off-the-shelf knees because they are symmetric items (in most cases) being placed in an asymmetric space. The external rotation compromise closes the lateral flexion gap that is created when lopping off bone on the lateral side of your knee when the implant is symmetric and the polys are level. If you externally rotate a ConforMIS femur it won't work the way it is supposed to, just as if you place a systematic femur in neutral on mechanical axis without external rotation you will have a problem.
If you mean the femur "shifted" after it was implanted that is probably down to poor cementing technique or an infection that you may have acquired that caused the implant to loosen after the cement cured. I am not sure regarding your personal situation and I don't want to make assumptions as you have already been through a lot and insulted by people here as well.
Regarding the tibia, I am not sure how it "rotated" either, but the tibial placement of a ConforMIS tibia is pretty hard to screw up given the coverage they provide. Again, the surgeon could have messed this up via initial placement error, chasing his/her tial if they externally rotated the femur, or cementing technique error.
I hate to say this, but it sounds like your case was screwed up and your surgeon made some significant mistakes. I hope you sought out someone else for your revision as it sounds like this person is not working with your best interests in mind.
Blaming ConforMIS for your surgeon screwing up is kind of like blaming the farmer that raised the cow when a chef overcooks your steak.