Dissolving GBO

Quote
anonymous said:
MR here. JW is making me kill MR. Well they don't call me MR for no reason.

ICEBERG - that's my vision for the future. Why you ask? Well, I thought it was a nice visual - think titanic hitting iceberg.
Click to expand...


What iceberg?? Our captain thinks that we have to sail the route that is less traveled even though the route has already sunk many boats. With the right mindset we can overcome the iceberg and be the pioneer.
 






I was hoping to leave my mark on GBO with this restructuring. It defeats the purpose when people start quitting. Am I that bad that people are leaving without even collecting bonus? I thought I was loved.

Alright no job cuts. The good people are quitting with the scare I gave them at the staff meeting other day. I’ve been spinning this at USLT as win - I fixed our AHR problem with words. That’s impressive. When am I getting promoted?
 












Why are you individuals all hating on me? Don’t you realize that I just took over FAO. Muahahhahahah! They don’t call me M Rod for no reason.

That’s the the real roadkill here. Mark my words. Roadkill.

M Rod Tip for FAO: you lost. Get used to it. Now, you need to play along as you get your resumes ready and look for a new gig. Either way, I’ll give you the boot in 3 months.
 






GBO sucks up money, pays consultants literally millions of dollars to put together spreadsheets, does not value having skilled people, instead prefers to send money and knowledge outside the door. MA&S was a bunch of Johny come latelies that couldn't even describe a database much less do anythign with one. They'd stick around maybe a year and then off to the next shinning object, not prodoving value along the way. Horrible to work with and ineffective. They do crap like hire sme guy with a medical degree and expect him to be able to buold a data platform. O! M! G!

FAO, with a few exceptions, is full of a bunch of weak non-technical managers who prentend to be technical. A bunch of them were women who were prematurely promoted to the director level two years ago as an effort to protect their jobs. Some genius thought director level and above should not be cut. So instesad of cutting all the fat they just promoted the fat.

And in general GBO takes credit for work they do not do and they DO NOT make decisions that are best for the company nor patients.

Some of the sorriest, pettiest and ineffective leaders exist in FAO. They always talk about the next big data platform, yet after 10 years of working with them never seen anything produced of value ... well except for those spreadhseets ZS makes for them.
 






Yeah...but tell me how you really feel

anonymous said:
GBO sucks up money, pays consultants literally millions of dollars to put together spreadsheets, does not value having skilled people, instead prefers to send money and knowledge outside the door. MA&S was a bunch of Johny come latelies that couldn't even describe a database much less do anythign with one. They'd stick around maybe a year and then off to the next shinning object, not prodoving value along the way. Horrible to work with and ineffective. They do crap like hire sme guy with a medical degree and expect him to be able to buold a data platform. O! M! G!

FAO, with a few exceptions, is full of a bunch of weak non-technical managers who prentend to be technical. A bunch of them were women who were prematurely promoted to the director level two years ago as an effort to protect their jobs. Some genius thought director level and above should not be cut. So instesad of cutting all the fat they just promoted the fat.

And in general GBO takes credit for work they do not do and they DO NOT make decisions that are best for the company nor patients.

Some of the sorriest, pettiest and ineffective leaders exist in FAO. They always talk about the next big data platform, yet after 10 years of working with them never seen anything produced of value ... well except for those spreadhseets ZS makes for them.
Click to expand...
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote