DBLs































I remember Jon when he worked at Pfizer. Great guy indeed. And you're right. He is crazy

Are you talking about Jon Coktoasten? That crazy sonuvabitch. He's a rule breaker.

I remember one of those Pfizer meetings in the mid 90's when they said we had to pick either chicken or beef as an entree at the lunch buffet. Not only did Jon get chicken AND beef, but that crazy sonuvagun got 2 desserts and took 3 bottled waters back to his room.

Two words: party animal
 






Are you talking about Jon Coktoasten? That crazy sonuvabitch. He's a rule breaker.

I remember one of those Pfizer meetings in the mid 90's when they said we had to pick either chicken or beef as an entree at the lunch buffet. Not only did Jon get chicken AND beef, but that crazy sonuvagun got 2 desserts and took 3 bottled waters back to his room.

Two words: party animal

I heard about that. That is Jon for sure!
 
















































Damn, just read the threads down the side of this company board...hungry little dirt bags posting leading questions over and over...not our problem they have reports that they have to fill out on us, and our companies role as part of their competitive landscape report. Hungry for info, brazen as hell, completely unqualified to make claims to the competitor that hired them claiming falsely that they have any ethical access to inside information, and over all cheap as hell because they wan to take advantage of public forum and rip information off here for free. They basically repackage it and sell it. Enough is Enough! We can smell the garbage pickers!
 
























Were you picked on as a child? Shorter than most? Overweight?

dude, have a little problem when a person wants to shed a little light? So you feel it's fine for the Pharma CI scammers to continue to operate completely under the radar? You okay with them selling themselves on having inside access and being able to identify "inside information on pharma competitive companies" to sell this to competitors? You okay with them describing "mining social media" as one of their CI tools on their own web sites, only to keep acting as if this "mining" or "trolling" never happens? Then you must be Okay with them claiming to be anything they feel like so they can disarm others then connive and grab what they are desperate to know? Guess using misleading research claims and multiple follow up- high pressure calls using different approaches and names is okay? Reaching out with different names, like a middle name, a maiden name and even setting up phony on-line web sites for fake companies and setting up fake professional networking accounts, and fake e-mail addresses must all be okay with you too then? Seems a solid question would be why are you so offended if some may feel its high time to turn the tables back on them? The way I read all of this is, why can't those that are aware shed a little light on the matter for the rest of us. No harm in being aware of some of the other slimy tactics that the CI "consultants " use. Seems only fair.