Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
Congress could soon allow the benefits of current retirees to be cut as part of an agreement to address the fiscal distress confronting some of the nation’s 1,400 multi-employer pension plans.
Congress could soon allow the benefits of current retirees to be cut as part of an agreement to address the fiscal distress confronting some of the nation’s 1,400 multi-employer pension plans.
That is why I took my lump sum on Dec 1. Only you can look out for your own interests.
Congress could soon allow the benefits of current retirees to be cut as part of an agreement to address the fiscal distress confronting some of the nation’s 1,400 multi-employer pension plans.
Congress could soon allow the benefits of current retirees to be cut as part of an agreement to address the fiscal distress confronting some of the nation’s 1,400 multi-employer pension plans.
This is ILLEGAL and we worked for many years to get our retirement benefits!! It is my time now to sip dry martinis and play the ponies!!
Currently it's illegal. There was a law that was passed around 1975 ish where companies and states needed for fully compensate employees. It is currently under review by congress. A pension is just a promise to pay. Promises are broken all the time.
You are a fool. The blotted pensions need to go. We as taxpayers don't owe you a f??king thing FU sponges!
Problem with the lump sum is if the interest rates go up, you are screwed. Lump sum goes down and you are stuck with a shaky Inuits.
So much for the "scare tactics"; I am sure they are speaking about municipal, state, federal pensions to begin with. Also, yes people should receive pensions if they have earned them/worked many years/promised, etc. Ethical companies would honor their promise.
AZ rep here who has an absolute understanding of defined benefit pension plans. Yes, as interest rates rise, the amount of a lump sum payout goes down. Interest rates will one day creep back up. if you are able, take your lump sum now, but ALWAYS QUESTION THE CALCULATED AMOUNT! Quite often it is wrong!
So much for the "scare tactics"; I am sure they are speaking about municipal, state, federal pensions to begin with. Also, yes people should receive pensions if they have earned them/worked many years/promised, etc. Ethical companies would honor their promise.
Exactly, it will be one size fits all. They will take away medical soon. If all the companies do it no company gains an advantage over the other. Look at IBM, GE and other big companies. They stripped away all benefits legally possible. If the law changes they will go further. Bunch of lawyers and pencil pushers.Sorry but, no it is not just public servants. This is happening across all industries not just pharma. It even gets into the 'why' an aggressive/hostile take-over happens.
If a company is sitting on a large cash pile that is used to pay out the retirement benefits, in comes a hostile company who then cries that the 'new' company actually has unpaid debts that must be paid before the retirees~~bam goes your retirement benefits as the new company goes into reorganization.
While it started with public servants it is now a significant part of the new business model.
But, we all want this~~we want it to happen to the 'other guy' but then get upset when it comes our way.
So much for the "scare tactics"; I am sure they are speaking about municipal, state, federal pensions to begin with. Also, yes people should receive pensions if they have earned them/worked many years/promised, etc. Ethical companies would honor their promise.
Exactly, it will be one size fits all. They will take away medical soon. If all the companies do it no company gains an advantage over the other. Look at IBM, GE and other big companies. They stripped away all benefits legally possible. If the law changes they will go further. Bunch of lawyers and pencil pushers.