College Football: Will the SEC "6 Peat"

[Anonymous]

huh, you are dumber than dirt and suffer from serious delusions if you truly believe oregone plays a tougher schedule. oregone strength of schedule in the computers is 65th and bama is 36th.

what part of the SEC will remain king until someone actually beats them in Janaury in the national title game? dumb ass

Your Fagarin Rankings of schedule are clearly bullshit, the 7 teams Alabama has played have a 2013 record of 22-27, bet you're looking forward to that classic tilt against Chattanooga on November 23rd. Yeah, feel the power, when real programs are deep into conference play the SUC schedules an FCS power game. Jump on the bandwagon boy! SUC!SUC!SUC! Yay "conference"!

 

[Anonymous]

Your Fagarin Rankings of schedule are clearly bullshit, the 7 teams Alabama has played have a 2013 record of 22-27, bet you're looking forward to that classic tilt against Chattanooga on November 23rd. Yeah, feel the power, when real programs are deep into conference play the SUC schedules an FCS power game. Jump on the bandwagon boy! SUC!SUC!SUC! Yay "conference"!

I got 2 words for you regarding Oregone schedule....... Nicholls State....... now only total moron questions 7 consecutive national titles. in the majority of those games, the sec was the underdog and ranked #2 going into the game only to beat down #1 just like Auburn did to your #1 Oregone team a couple of years ago. Damn you have one super sized case of SEC Envy...... SEC always welcomes any type of playoff. The BCS was a 2 team playoff and the new 4 team playoff next year will further show SEC dominance. Careful what you wish for Guido.

8 Peat

 

[Anonymous]

I got 2 words for you regarding Oregone schedule....... Nicholls State....... now only total moron questions 7 consecutive national titles. in the majority of those games, the sec was the underdog and ranked #2 going into the game only to beat down #1 just like Auburn did to your #1 Oregone team a couple of years ago. Damn you have one super sized case of SEC Envy...... SEC always welcomes any type of playoff. The BCS was a 2 team playoff and the new 4 team playoff next year will further show SEC dominance. Careful what you wish for Guido.

8 Peat

Today the ACC and Pac 12 are undefeated after playing SUC teams. Quit looking at ancient history grandpa Clem, your obsession with Oregon is funny.

 

[Anonymous]

Today the ACC and Pac 12 are undefeated after playing SUC teams. Quit looking at ancient history grandpa Clem, your obsession with Oregon is funny.

LMFAO...... You`re the one who posted about Oregone being all that. Personally, I miss not being able to talk about mEEEchican but they are so awful...... nobody would care.

8 Peat

 

[Anonymous]

If there were a real playoff you might not have a team in the final...

Poor Guido, he blames the BCS for his conferences failures but reality shows the BCS has nothing to do with them sucking. It runs much deeper than the BCS. Looking back at 40 years prior to the BCS (1960s, 1970s, 1980s and 1990s up to `97) shows that the SEC was still the best football conference. Here is look at national titles of the 3 conferences going all the way back to 1960 which is before most of us were even born.

little 1o...... 4 titles
pac 1........ 7 titles
SEC....... 10 titles

Now mind you, lil 1o and Pac 1 wanted to accept status quo and letting homer voters decide on a national champion. Both fought going to a 2 team playoff cause they knew they would get exposed.

Here is a look at last 50+ years (1960-2013) including the 2 team playoff (BCS).

lil1o......... 5 titles
pac 1......... 8 titles
SEC........... 18 titles

Looking forward to the new 4 team playoff next year cause it will further expose the weaknesses of the lil 1o and pac 1.

 

[Anonymous]

I got 2 words for you regarding Oregone schedule....... Nicholls State....... now only total moron questions 7 consecutive national titles. in the majority of those games, the sec was the underdog and ranked #2 going into the game only to beat down #1 just like Auburn did to your #1 Oregone team a couple of years ago. Damn you have one super sized case of SEC Envy...... SEC always welcomes any type of playoff. The BCS was a 2 team playoff and the new 4 team playoff next year will further show SEC dominance. Careful what you wish for Guido.

8 Peat

I got words for you BandwagonBoy:

Colorado State, Georgia State, Chattanooga. Wow, 3 cupcakes not including the SUC schedule. Virginia Tech has the best record of any team the Tide has played this year. Remember, so far this year the Tide schedule is teams that are a combined 22-27, one ranked opponent and only 1 or 2 ranked teams remaining. If this were translated into an RPI like in basketball, the sport with a real playoff that creates real national champions (like Florida) in the most exciting three weeks of college athletics, Alabama would have a really bad seed and have to work to make the final, not be granted it. One last word BWB, just in case you forgot: Oregon 59, Tennessee 14. Good thing Tennessee rebounded with that awesome SUC schedule that included Austin Peay, Western Kentucky and South Alabama. The SUC is a f'ing joke.

 

[Anonymous]

Poor Guido, he blames the BCS for his conferences failures but reality shows the BCS has nothing to do with them sucking. It runs much deeper than the BCS. Looking back at 40 years prior to the BCS (1960s, 1970s, 1980s and 1990s up to `97) shows that the SEC was still the best football conference. Here is look at national titles of the 3 conferences going all the way back to 1960 which is before most of us were even born.

little 1o...... 4 titles
pac 1........ 7 titles
SEC....... 10 titles

Now mind you, lil 1o and Pac 1 wanted to accept status quo and letting homer voters decide on a national champion. Both fought going to a 2 team playoff cause they knew they would get exposed.

Here is a look at last 50+ years (1960-2013) including the 2 team playoff (BCS).

lil1o......... 5 titles
pac 1......... 8 titles
SEC........... 18 titles

Looking forward to the new 4 team playoff next year cause it will further expose the weaknesses of the lil 1o and pac 1.

True date. 1 title every 10 years with no playoff and only homer voters was best of mediocracy and best possible situation for big 10. If they did not like the BCS, they will really hate the new 4 team playoff.

 

[Anonymous]

fl state Oregon and osu are the best. If they just paid a iittle more like alabooma they could compete

 

[Anonymous]

TOP 5 IN HISTORY

1. Michigan: 888-306-38
2. Texas: 853-326-34
3. Notre Dame: 845-296-42
4. Nebraska: 836-345-41
5. Ohio State: 825-315-53

 

[Anonymous]

TOP 5 IN HISTORY

1. Michigan: 888-306-38
2. Texas: 853-326-34
3. Notre Dame: 845-296-42
4. Nebraska: 836-345-41
5. Ohio State: 825-315-53

Stop using facts, BandwagonBoy's head will explode and he'll bring out all the "OOC awesome conference wins" and his BowlChampion crap. Notice none of the SUC fans want a full playoff system because wins on the field are harder to get than payments under the table. If Alabama loses to LSU and Missouri in the conference game they'll still want an Alabama-Georgia bcs final. Morons.

 

[Anonymous]

TOP 5 IN HISTORY

1. Michigan: 888-306-38
2. Texas: 853-326-34
3. Notre Dame: 845-296-42
4. Nebraska: 836-345-41
5. Ohio State: 825-315-53

Oh shit, here goes the lil man from mEEEchican with his crap. Where ya been lil man anyway? Sounds like you been down in the basement with grandpa watching old Vhs tapes of mEEEchican from back in the world war 2 days. I know mEEEchican was the real deal 70-80 years ago...... LMFAO

 

[Anonymous]

fl state Oregon and osu are the best. If they just paid a iittle more like alabooma they could compete

Sagarin weekly top 10 and strength of schedule.

1.. Bama (43)
2. FSU (42)
3. Oregon (68)
4. Baylor (100)
5. Missouri (30)
6. Lsu (9)
7. Stanford (11)
8. wisconsin (83)
9. Arizona St (13)
10. Ohio St (76)

If a team can`t at least play a top 50 schedule, they should be excluded from a top 10 ranking. I mean anyone can rack up wins vs little sisters of the poor. Are you listening Oregon, baylor, Wisconsin and osu?

 

[Anonymous]

Sagarin weekly top 10 and strength of schedule.

1.. Bama (43)
2. FSU (42)
3. Oregon (68)
4. Baylor (100)
5. Missouri (30)
6. Lsu (9)
7. Stanford (11)
8. wisconsin (83)
9. Arizona St (13)
10. Ohio St (76)

If a team can`t at least play a top 50 schedule, they should be excluded from a top 10 ranking. I mean anyone can rack up wins vs little sisters of the poor. Are you listening Oregon, baylor, Wisconsin and osu?

Oregon's schedule strength dropped significantly after they beat Tennessee 59-14.

 

[Anonymous]

Oregon's schedule strength dropped significantly after they beat Tennessee 59-14.

but meeeeeeechicant`s strength of schedule is 85th and is better than wisconsin and almost as good as ohio st. go blue........ go little man....... go grandpa.......

 

[Anonymous]

Stop using facts, BandwagonBoy's head will explode and he'll bring out all the "OOC awesome conference wins" and his BowlChampion crap. Notice none of the SUC fans want a full playoff system because wins on the field are harder to get than payments under the table. If Alabama loses to LSU and Missouri in the conference game they'll still want an Alabama-Georgia bcs final. Morons.

You have this little guy down. NO team to root for. we root hard win or lose. cook brats, drink beer and have fun even after a loss.......this little guy has no team at all. pathetic. something very very sad and horrific happened to him or his mother in the deep bowels of a frat house in the big 10 or pac 10. something very bad. he is so so mixed up. can u imagine his face if he walking into an auburn bar and said roll tide. LOL. he would not know better. he doesn't even know about the rivalary there..........bandwagon conference. I have never heard of that in my life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! we want every other team in our conference to lose so that WE win our conference..........Hmmmm. we must be strange or different. LOL. Do think it "happened" to him or his mom?? interesting. Alambama definitely does not have the payroll of the Jacksonville Jags but close and they could play them within 48 points. They really could........What do you expect when a CURRENT COACH hands a player 5 hundo in hundred dollar bills??? LOL and unreal. at least the other SUC schools do it thru boosters and don't have coaches hand out hard green bills. LOL. figures. he was fired..........no he can forget about getting those new front teeth.

 

[Anonymous]

DA HUGE TOP 5 OF ALL-TIME

1. Michigan: 888-306-38
2. Texas: 853-326-34
3. Notre Dame: 845-296-42
4. Nebraska:836-345-41
5. Ohio State: 825-315-53
NUTTIN ELSE TO SAY. PERIOD.

 

[Anonymous]

DA HUGE TOP 5 OF ALL-TIME

1. Michigan: 888-306-38
2. Texas: 853-326-34
3. Notre Dame: 845-296-42
4. Nebraska:836-345-41
5. Ohio State: 825-315-53
NUTTIN ELSE TO SAY. PERIOD.

top 5 of what? hell the buffalo bills can say they won games but they ain`t got a damn thing to show in the form of winning championships. you got to have championships to be recognized as a true winner. otherwise you`re nothing but a desperate fluffer trying to win sympathy cuz you ain`t good enough to really win something that matters. sh1t why don`t you add your spring games as wins going back for the last century to add 100 more meaningless fluffer wins. hahahahahahahahaha

 

[Anonymous]

Hey BITCHES, your forgetting about the real school

We are Penn State!!!


Forever

 

[Anonymous]

DA HUGE TOP 5 OF ALL-TIME

1. Michigan: 888-306-38
2. Texas: 853-326-34
3. Notre Dame: 845-296-42
4. Nebraska:836-345-41
5. Ohio State: 825-315-53
NUTTIN ELSE TO SAY. PERIOD.

 

[Anonymous]

DA HUGE TOP 5 OF ALL-TIME

1. Michigan: 888-306-38
2. Texas: 853-326-34
3. Notre Dame: 845-296-42
4. Nebraska:836-345-41
5. Ohio State: 825-315-53
NUTTIN ELSE TO SAY. PERIOD.

top 5 of what? hell the buffalo bills can say they won games but they ain`t got a damn thing to show in the form of winning championships. you got to have championships to be recognized as a true winner. otherwise you`re nothing but a desperate fluffer trying to win sympathy cuz you ain`t good enough to really win something that matters. sh1t why don`t you add your spring games as wins going back for the last century to add 100 more meaningless fluffer wins. hahahahahahahahaha