• Mon news: Pfizer wins legal patent battle over GSK. Hospitals face hurricane-induced IV shortages. Activist investor takes $1B stake in Pfizer. MicroRNA pioneers win Nobel. Jude Bio debuts with $100M. See more on our front page

Christian terrorist in Colorado Springs!


<







Bad situation. I don't support his actions, but his motivation was to preserve innocent human life, he's going about it in the wrong way.
This is hardly a threat however compared to Islamic and atheist terrorists, so on the terrorism front this is a yawner, though I'm sure your libtard panties will be all in a wad.
 




Let's see how the 'Pro-Life' crowd reacts to yet another one of their own christian jihadist's going on a rampage. These same hypocrites who supposedly support the right to life seem to have a penchant for wanting to kill people. Go figure.

Yeah, you seem to be pretty incompetent when it comes to figuring.
 








This is domestic terrorism and should be called that since it is aimed at the women of America. This has been stoked by the likes of Ted Cruz, Huckabe and other radical Christianists

More American's have been victims of terrorism from white christian males in the past 10 years than have been victims of foreign terrorists.
 








This is domestic terrorism and should be called that since it is aimed at the women of America. This has been stoked by the likes of Ted Cruz, Huckabe and other radical Christianists

More American's have been victims of terrorism from white christian males in the past 10 years than have been victims of foreign terrorists.

Those you mentioned aren't radical Christians, at least not in the negative way you mean it.
And if you think White Christian Males have committed more terrorism than foreign terrorists, you are dumber than a turnip.
 




Those you mentioned aren't radical Christians, at least not in the negative way you mean it.
And if you think White Christian Males have committed more terrorism than foreign terrorists, you are dumber than a turnip.

WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0

Facts, focus and reality are not your strong points.
 




This is domestic terrorism and should be called that since it is aimed at the women of America. This has been stoked by the likes of Ted Cruz, Huckabe and other radical Christianists

More American's have been victims of terrorism from white christian males in the past 10 years than have been victims of foreign terrorists.
IDIOT post^^^^
 




WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0

Facts, focus and reality are not your strong points.

Well, actually they are which is why I know your post and your source are bogus. SINCE 9-11 and roughly 3,000 people killed by Muslims? Gee that's a convenient starting point for liberal trash.
 




The Republican silence is sad and un-American. This event happened 24 hours ago, and lives were lost. It’s sad more candidates can’t show their support for those in mourning. Republicans can disagree with what PP does and grieve for those injured and killed but being pro-life means opposing murder, period.
 




It hasn't even been established that PP was the target, and he was registered to vote as a Woman. Your Liberal wet dream is going to have to wait it appears. Plus he shot cops, which makes him YOUR kind of guy.
 




The Republican silence is sad and un-American. This event happened 24 hours ago, and lives were lost. It’s sad more candidates can’t show their support for those in mourning. Republicans can disagree with what PP does and grieve for those injured and killed but being pro-life means opposing murder, period.

All you have is lies and hysterical misrepresentations.
As the Libs man has pointed out we don't even know the facts of the situation yet. It may have had nothing to do with PP, so just shut it until the facts are fully established.
 




WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0

Facts, focus and reality are not your strong points.

Actually those things are not YOUR strong points. Your strong points are misrepresentation, bias, irrationality and outright lies.

A plurality, if not a majority, of those who have committed the non-Muslim terrorists acts have been influenced by leftist ideology, atheistic ideology etc.

Once again, the facts destroy you.
 








Actually those things are not YOUR strong points. Your strong points are misrepresentation, bias, irrationality and outright lies.

A plurality, if not a majority, of those who have committed the non-Muslim terrorists acts have been influenced by leftist ideology, atheistic ideology etc.

Once again, the facts destroy you.

Once again, you do nothing to debate of refute that facts except tell lies that cannot be backed up with sources while waiving a white flag as you surrender. Everything I posted was factual and you chose to take a page out of the Karl Rove playbook with continued diversion and fluff posts.

Since you have backed yourself into a corner with your ludicrous statement, please provide proof or any sort of example that "non-Muslim terrorists acts have been influenced by leftist ideology, atheistic ideology etc."

The numbers that support the majority of domestic terrorists being radical right wing Christian are factual and accounted for while your 'claim' is baseless, like the majority of everything you post.
 




Well, actually they are which is why I know your post and your source are bogus. SINCE 9-11 and roughly 3,000 people killed by Muslims? Gee that's a convenient starting point for liberal trash.

My post is factual and uses a post 911 starting point as that was when the country became more aware of domestic terrorism. I know you can't refute the facts that I have presented, so you claim my post to be bogus. Typical and pathetic tactic that most conservative wing nuts use when they know that they been proven wrong.

You are dismissed.
 




It hasn't even been established that PP was the target, and he was registered to vote as a Woman. Your Liberal wet dream is going to have to wait it appears. Plus he shot cops, which makes him YOUR kind of guy.

Wake up and smell the coffee, dipshit. You are wrong again. PP was the target.

Suspected Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooter Robert Lewis Dear mentioned "baby parts" to investigators and in later interviews expressed anti-abortion and anti-government views.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting/
 




All you have is lies and hysterical misrepresentations.
As the Libs man has pointed out we don't even know the facts of the situation yet. It may have had nothing to do with PP, so just shut it until the facts are fully established.

Well, the facts and it had ALL to do with PP. The party of hate can't condemn one of their own for doing what they imply is the moral course of action. They love their guns, and they hate women who choose to exercise control of their own bodies. They lie, and espouse false videos to further their political aims. It's no coincidence that this mass murderer said "No more body parts" as he was brutally slaughtering unarmed citizens, and a police officer. Direct reference to the phony video pushed by the GOP. So this nut job just acted on what they rant about. The GOP candidates will just ignore this and hope it goes away all while they are busy trying to scrub the blood off of their hands.