AND THE VERDICT IS......?????

anonymous

Guest
Once again this board fiddles while Rome burns. The Boston case just went to the jury on Friday. Deliberations begin tomorrow. It has been a fascinating 10 weeks thus far. How long the jury will need to reach a verdict is anyone's guess.

A few observations. Wilkerson hasn't advanced either her own, nor her client's credibility. Granted, it's a tough case to defend, but its' s what she does and frankly her arguments were both improbable and illogical. When the prosecutor hastens to agree with your point, (Burlakoff is a liar and unstable) and asks in open court "Look at him!" "Would YOU hire HIM for your VP of sales?" It's a pretty safe bet you are not scoring points with the jury.

Kapoor as the grieving widower narrative, flies in the face of multiple romantic entanglements he has enjoyed with his youthful, nubile sales reps. Many adjectives come to mind that describe Kapoor to a "T". Grief-stricken, sadly is not among them.

I had a good laugh at the Sgt. Schultz defense: "I see, hear, know nothing." Yes, quite right ! You never saw that video or those pesky spreadsheets. I understand there is no IQ test for jurors. Still, it seems a bit risky to assume their intelligence cannot be offended.

Then there is my favorite. When all else fails, claim victim status. Kapoor is the target of a government conspiracy to "take down" a top CEO. It's not clear, to me, from the reporting, why the government would spend years and thousands of tax payors dollars attempting such a thing. But if you acknowledge that it is inherently difficult to disprove something that didn't happen, I guess it's as good a strategy as any.

So the decision is now up to 12 people. I hold no illusions. Nothing is certain, least of all justice. It's a system as flawed as the people who rely on it. But, for now, to bring this hideous story to it's end, it's the best we can do.
 






My favorite part is how wilkinson paints kapoor as a GULLIBLE billionaire, a victim even. as if those two words do not contradict each other. its so disrespectful and insulting to the jury’s intelligence. She it’s so elitist to underestimate the public’s intelligence, big mistake. I am sure that went over well with the jury: Poor billionaire kapoor, he made his billions by being naive and helpless. He is just like grandpa surviving on his social security. Anyone who comes from a middle class background is rolling their eyes at the defense ridiculous nonsense.

As for Wilkinson she has become a joke among her peers, pathetic and laughable. most of us find her elitist excuses despicable and the height of hypocrisy. Is there anything she won’t do for money? How much was her soul worth? She should take warning from burlakoff, there is nothing that fool would not do for money.

Money is what the foster kids don’t have and they will never get a fair shake in the legal system. What a way to use your talent, to defend the most disgusting clown in pharma. It’s a crying shame.

Let us not even mention the tragic joke that is kapoor. What a clown.

I personally consider kapoor to be a vicious predator who used his money and position to intimidate and manipulate employees as a means to an end: all for his personal enrichment. He singlehandly destroyed so many lives. It will take generations for families to recover not to mention the deaths!!!
One day he will answer to the children of his victims, the foster care system is full of them. Justice will come today, or tomorrow, or when he meets his maker. No one escapes, in the end we all will meet our maker.
Everything kapoor touches he corrupts. I hope Wilkinson starts taking some probono cases on behalf of the foster kids that are victims of insys and the opioid crisis. So many ruined lives and destroyed careers, broken dreams...but the victim was kapoor? Apparently Wilkinson thinks so! even the mighty Wilkinson will not escape the stench of kapoor easily. Disgusting, all of them make me sick. Guilty a thousand times over. Please god, justice for the children, curse the greedy, make them pay!
 






My favorite part is how wilkinson paints kapoor as a GULLIBLE billionaire, a victim even. as if those two words do not contradict each other. its so disrespectful and insulting to the jury’s intelligence. She it’s so elitist to underestimate the public’s intelligence, big mistake. I am sure that went over well with the jury: Poor billionaire kapoor, he made his billions by being naive and helpless. He is just like grandpa surviving on his social security. Anyone who comes from a middle class background is rolling their eyes at the defense ridiculous nonsense.

As for Wilkinson she has become a joke among her peers, pathetic and laughable. most of us find her elitist excuses despicable and the height of hypocrisy. Is there anything she won’t do for money? How much was her soul worth? She should take warning from burlakoff, there is nothing that fool would not do for money.

Money is what the foster kids don’t have and they will never get a fair shake in the legal system. What a way to use your talent, to defend the most disgusting clown in pharma. It’s a crying shame.

Let us not even mention the tragic joke that is kapoor. What a clown.

I personally consider kapoor to be a vicious predator who used his money and position to intimidate and manipulate employees as a means to an end: all for his personal enrichment. He singlehandly destroyed so many lives. It will take generations for families to recover not to mention the deaths!!!
One day he will answer to the children of his victims, the foster care system is full of them. Justice will come today, or tomorrow, or when he meets his maker. No one escapes, in the end we all will meet our maker.
Everything kapoor touches he corrupts. I hope Wilkinson starts taking some probono cases on behalf of the foster kids that are victims of insys and the opioid crisis. So many ruined lives and destroyed careers, broken dreams...but the victim was kapoor? Apparently Wilkinson thinks so! even the mighty Wilkinson will not escape the stench of kapoor easily. Disgusting, all of them make me sick. Guilty a thousand times over. Please god, justice for the children, curse the greedy, make them pay!


I feel your anger and personal pain and would offer the only thing I can. Understanding and genuine concern. It won't be enough, but it's all that's been left those of us who lost someone we love.

I have been, quietly, in this fight for years and I know this, "They" don't matter. Their fate doesn't matter. What's important is that we stop the killing for profit. The only way to do this is to keep the white hot spot-light of the media focused on the corporations and individuals who are, at this very moment, still profiting from dealing in death. Take notice of Purdue's current situation and know that we are still out there. Watching, waiting and keeping things on track. Keep underestimating us. It just makes things easier.

Love to stay and chat but I've got a stack of folks in Congress to get back with.
 






Poster #2 - you make an alarming number of foster kid references. Please elaborate. If children were put into foster care as a direct result of Insys's alleged misconduct why were these testimonies not heard? I would think these would be crucial to the government's case.


My favorite part is how wilkinson paints kapoor as a GULLIBLE billionaire, a victim even. as if those two words do not contradict each other. its so disrespectful and insulting to the jury’s intelligence. She it’s so elitist to underestimate the public’s intelligence, big mistake. I am sure that went over well with the jury: Poor billionaire kapoor, he made his billions by being naive and helpless. He is just like grandpa surviving on his social security. Anyone who comes from a middle class background is rolling their eyes at the defense ridiculous nonsense.

As for Wilkinson she has become a joke among her peers, pathetic and laughable. most of us find her elitist excuses despicable and the height of hypocrisy. Is there anything she won’t do for money? How much was her soul worth? She should take warning from burlakoff, there is nothing that fool would not do for money.

Money is what the foster kids don’t have and they will never get a fair shake in the legal system. What a way to use your talent, to defend the most disgusting clown in pharma. It’s a crying shame.

Let us not even mention the tragic joke that is kapoor. What a clown.

I personally consider kapoor to be a vicious predator who used his money and position to intimidate and manipulate employees as a means to an end: all for his personal enrichment. He singlehandly destroyed so many lives. It will take generations for families to recover not to mention the deaths!!!
One day he will answer to the children of his victims, the foster care system is full of them. Justice will come today, or tomorrow, or when he meets his maker. No one escapes, in the end we all will meet our maker.
Everything kapoor touches he corrupts. I hope Wilkinson starts taking some probono cases on behalf of the foster kids that are victims of insys and the opioid crisis. So many ruined lives and destroyed careers, broken dreams...but the victim was kapoor? Apparently Wilkinson thinks so! even the mighty Wilkinson will not escape the stench of kapoor easily. Disgusting, all of them make me sick. Guilty a thousand times over. Please god, justice for the children, curse the greedy, make them pay!
 






Poster #2 - you make an alarming number of foster kid references. Please elaborate. If children were put into foster care as a direct result of Insys's alleged misconduct why were these testimonies not heard? I would think these would be crucial to the government's case.
I have long known that those involved in perpetuating the nation's opioid crisis have difficulty associating their actions with the tragic consequences. It's a form of denial, I should think, but more likely....they just don't care. In any case, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to make the connection between the statistical spike in opioid deaths and the corresponding increase in children needing foster care. Dayton Daily News...

Their parents are dead or perhaps addicted and unable to care for them. As a grandparent of children in that situation, I feel qualified to "elaborate" Insys and others, have taken these children's once stable families and destroyed them. But you know all this, as do the jurors in Boston. So what's your point? Your ass has already been prominently displayed and we are not impressed.
 












Poster #2 - you make an alarming number of foster kid references. Please elaborate. If children were put into foster care as a direct result of Insys's alleged misconduct why were these testimonies not heard? I would think these would be crucial to the government's case.

It’s a great question: why did these children not testify? I can think of many reasons....but I don’t know why they were not brought to trial. I imagine it is because family/foster court proceedings are done in secret, keeping the children silenced and without an ability for redress. It’s standard practice and enables extensive institutional abuses. Foster care has a wretched record. Their numbers are a cause for tremendous concern. Don’t go down that rabbit hole though, “those who know can’t sleep.” Once you start researching, it’s the stuff of nightmares.
The fact remains there are countless foster children that have lost their parents to addiction. Lost dreams, no ballet lessons, piano, no little league, no one to help with homework, no one to tuck you in and tell you a story. No dreams, no future just ghetto/ foster culture....meanwhile the billionaire kapoor was the victim while he cashed in?

Now a simple online search using the terms “opioid epidemic and foster care” revealed these initial results: ( there are way more than just the three I linked)

https://www.npr.org/2017/12/23/5730...-flooded-with-children-of-the-opioid-epidemic
The Foster Care System Is Flooded With Children Of The Opioid Epidemic

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180108161210.htm
The opioid crisis is causing serious consequences across the country. One of the biggest, illicit opioid abusers are neglecting their children, resulting in more kids being removed from their homes. A new study finds a direct correlation between the epidemic and growing number of children placed in foster care.


https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/08/...utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=atdailycaller

A Texas woman who sold her seven-year-old son and attempted to sell her two toddler daughters in an effort to settle a drug debt

https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/resear...iction-epidemic-creates-crisis-in-foster-care

The nation’s drug-addiction epidemic is driving a dramatic increase in the number of children entering foster care, forcing many states to take urgent steps to care for neglected children.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/massachus...ntify-young-girl-found-dead/story?id=32205125
Massachusetts Police Desperate to Identify Young Girl Found Dead in Trash Bag
Anyone remember baby Bella? The opioid epidemic victims suffer with only secret courts and sealed records. Foster care is in need of dire reform. It is child abuse on an institutional level. When I grow up I want to be an addict like mommy and daddy said no one ever.
Poor kapoor, the vulnerable billionaire?..., the victim? Seriously how stupid do these elites think we are ? Clearly anyone who plays on kapoors team was born with a silver spoon in her mouth and could care less about the baby bella’s of this world Who have no voice. Aim high and hope they don’t die was the mantra and now a generation of baby Bella’s / foster care kids who don’t have just simply a parent to come home to. Their future is literally destroyed and they are vulnerable to all sorts of abusers and predators. I would not wish foster care on my worst enemy.

Foster care is not a topic of research for the faint hearted. It’s dark and it’s real and worst then you can imagine. Thank kapoor for creating a supply of children for the sexual traffickers, for the organ harvesters, for the medical experiments, the snuff films. You thought this was about fentanyl and kick backs? It’s so much worse...You’ve been warned.

We weep for the voiceless, those who lost their parents. Their lives have been set on a path that is very difficult to overcome. You are not forgotten.
 






I feel your anger and personal pain and would offer the only thing I can. Understanding and genuine concern. It won't be enough, but it's all that's been left those of us who lost someone we love.

I have been, quietly, in this fight for years and I know this, "They" don't matter. Their fate doesn't matter. What's important is that we stop the killing for profit. The only way to do this is to keep the white hot spot-light of the media focused on the corporations and individuals who are, at this very moment, still profiting from dealing in death. Take notice of Purdue's current situation and know that we are still out there. Watching, waiting and keeping things on track. Keep underestimating us. It just makes things easier.

Love to stay and chat but I've got a stack of folks in Congress to get back with.

Exactly....keep up the fight, a legion supports your cause.

We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.
 






It’s a great question: why did these children not testify? I can think of many reasons....but I don’t know why they were not brought to trial. I imagine it is because family/foster court proceedings are done in secret, keeping the children silenced and without an ability for redress. It’s standard practice and enables extensive institutional abuses. Foster care has a wretched record. Their numbers are a cause for tremendous concern. Don’t go down that rabbit hole though, “those who know can’t sleep.” Once you start researching, it’s the stuff of nightmares.
The fact remains there are countless foster children that have lost their parents to addiction. Lost dreams, no ballet lessons, piano, no little league, no one to help with homework, no one to tuck you in and tell you a story. No dreams, no future just ghetto/ foster culture....meanwhile the billionaire kapoor was the victim while he cashed in?

Now a simple online search using the terms “opioid epidemic and foster care” revealed these initial results: ( there are way more than just the three I linked)

https://www.npr.org/2017/12/23/5730...-flooded-with-children-of-the-opioid-epidemic
The Foster Care System Is Flooded With Children Of The Opioid Epidemic

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180108161210.htm
The opioid crisis is causing serious consequences across the country. One of the biggest, illicit opioid abusers are neglecting their children, resulting in more kids being removed from their homes. A new study finds a direct correlation between the epidemic and growing number of children placed in foster care.


https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/08/...utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=atdailycaller

A Texas woman who sold her seven-year-old son and attempted to sell her two toddler daughters in an effort to settle a drug debt

https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/resear...iction-epidemic-creates-crisis-in-foster-care

The nation’s drug-addiction epidemic is driving a dramatic increase in the number of children entering foster care, forcing many states to take urgent steps to care for neglected children.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/massachus...ntify-young-girl-found-dead/story?id=32205125
Massachusetts Police Desperate to Identify Young Girl Found Dead in Trash Bag
Anyone remember baby Bella? The opioid epidemic victims suffer with only secret courts and sealed records. Foster care is in need of dire reform. It is child abuse on an institutional level. When I grow up I want to be an addict like mommy and daddy said no one ever.
Poor kapoor, the vulnerable billionaire?..., the victim? Seriously how stupid do these elites think we are ? Clearly anyone who plays on kapoors team was born with a silver spoon in her mouth and could care less about the baby bella’s of this world Who have no voice. Aim high and hope they don’t die was the mantra and now a generation of baby Bella’s / foster care kids who don’t have just simply a parent to come home to. Their future is literally destroyed and they are vulnerable to all sorts of abusers and predators. I would not wish foster care on my worst enemy.

Foster care is not a topic of research for the faint hearted. It’s dark and it’s real and worst then you can imagine. Thank kapoor for creating a supply of children for the sexual traffickers, for the organ harvesters, for the medical experiments, the snuff films. You thought this was about fentanyl and kick backs? It’s so much worse...You’ve been warned.

We weep for the voiceless, those who lost their parents. Their lives have been set on a path that is very difficult to overcome. You are not forgotten.

Thank-you! First , for validating that there are intelligent, caring people with insight and wisdom to share. Second, for pointing out the horrible conditions under which so many already wounded children must live. It is an underreported piece of the opioid crisis and you remind us not to turn our heads and pretend we don't know what we know and see what we see.

I haven't done anything to help these children. I could say I've been busy with my own grandchildren, but that's just an excuse and a poor one at that. I'm well aware many children don't have loving grandparents.
This is my wake-up call and I will answer it. I hope others will join me. It all starts with a few (OK a lot) of phone calls. I'm thinking media event NOW!
 






Woooooow. People are really stretching in this thread.
Here is a statistic for you, at the peak of Subsys sales there was roughly 2500 patients on the medication nation wide.
2500.
That ends up being 0.01% of annual opioid sales in the US. Do the math. Still think it’s responsible for putting children out on the street?
To date I’ve only seen 1 wrongful death suit against Insys and the end user was an addict long before Subsys. She also was taking a plethora of other drugs.

Now, do I think the accused are guilty. Absolutely!

Do I think they ruined the lives of now displaced children? . Come on. Maybe hop on Perdue’s page if you want to point fingers.
 






Exactly....keep up the fight, a legion supports your cause.

We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.
It's really everyone's fight and we simply cannot afford to lose. We have all suffered personal losses, but the sheer number of young people being lost to opioid use, left unchecked, will essentially wipe out an entire generation. The statistics are shocking and they are real.

It's a huge, multi-faceted problem. Pick your battle carefully and pursue it relentlessly. Insys was low hanging fruit. Purdue & Mallinckrodt will be a much bigger fight. Call your Congressional Reps, both state and local. Ask what specifically they are doing to hold these companies to account. Make media connections by emailing reporters who publish articles on your specific area of concern. If you have a story, share it. It is your most powerful weapon.

Finally, be realistic. powerful, wealthy people will oppose you. You need some of your own.
 






Woooooow. People are really stretching in this thread.
Here is a statistic for you, at the peak of Subsys sales there was roughly 2500 patients on the medication nation wide.
2500.
That ends up being 0.01% of annual opioid sales in the US. Do the math. Still think it’s responsible for putting children out on the street?
To date I’ve only seen 1 wrongful death suit against Insys and the end user was an addict long before Subsys. She also was taking a plethora of other drugs.

Now, do I think the accused are guilty. Absolutely!

Do I think they ruined the lives of now displaced children? . Come on. Maybe hop on Perdue’s page if you want to point fingers.

I am so very tired of the oft quoted 0.01% of total opioid sales statistic and the errant conclusion that it somehow proves Insys was not a big enough "player" to be held accountable for it's part in the opioid crisis.
As to your assertion that ONLY 2500 people were taking Subsys at it's peak . So what? Apart from the fact that it is a statistically irrelevant number as it relates to actual Subsys use, ( you can't just eliminate time from the equation) 2500 is somehow exculpatory? Who made you the arbiter of which lives matter, or how many dead or damaged people are acceptable? You are aware of only one wrongful death lawsuit. And....? I suspect the mountain of relevant information about this company and the opioid crisis writ large , of which you are "unaware", is staggering.

Also, if you want to make a "What about them?" argument, and frankly I can't think why anyone past third grade would, at least get the spelling correct so that you don't end up foolishly comparing chicken farmers to opioid manufacturers. (Perdue sells chicken, Purdue sells Oxycontin)

It's an especially pernicious form of disingenuous to dismiss victims of Insys's illegal marketing as "end users" with previous addictions. You know very well that previous opioid tolerance was a prerequisite for prescribing Subsys. Of course they were on other opioids, that's what made them targets.

You don't think Insys is responsible for children who once had stable families and good homes, but now find themselves adrift in a nightmarish foster care system. That's fine. You should consider, however, keeping such irrational and nonsensical thoughts to yourself as they contribute nothing to the public discourse aimed at solving this serious problem.
 






I am so very tired of the oft quoted 0.01% of total opioid sales statistic and the errant conclusion that it somehow proves Insys was not a big enough "player" to be held accountable for it's part in the opioid crisis.
As to your assertion that ONLY 2500 people were taking Subsys at it's peak . So what? Apart from the fact that it is a statistically irrelevant number as it relates to actual Subsys use, ( you can't just eliminate time from the equation) 2500 is somehow exculpatory? Who made you the arbiter of which lives matter, or how many dead or damaged people are acceptable? You are aware of only one wrongful death lawsuit. And....? I suspect the mountain of relevant information about this company and the opioid crisis writ large , of which you are "unaware", is staggering.

Also, if you want to make a "What about them?" argument, and frankly I can't think why anyone past third grade would, at least get the spelling correct so that you don't end up foolishly comparing chicken farmers to opioid manufacturers. (Perdue sells chicken, Purdue sells Oxycontin)

It's an especially pernicious form of disingenuous to dismiss victims of Insys's illegal marketing as "end users" with previous addictions. You know very well that previous opioid tolerance was a prerequisite for prescribing Subsys. Of course they were on other opioids, that's what made them targets.

You don't think Insys is responsible for children who once had stable families and good homes, but now find themselves adrift in a nightmarish foster care system. That's fine. You should consider, however, keeping such irrational and nonsensical thoughts to yourself as they contribute nothing to the public discourse aimed at solving this serious problem.


What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Secondly, everyone is as well versed on Insys as you are. By the looks of it though you are easily swayed by the CNN chat rooms amongst other internet cowboys that you partake in. We all have google so slow your role and try reading beyond forum boards.

Is Insys a contributor to the “crisis”, statically no. Not even a drop in the bucket, but because of the revenue they will get pinned. O well. Aimed at a serious problem!? Hahah, you think your anonymous comment has a voice!? If you feel that compelled to solve the crisis put down the mash potatoes and write the FDA, DOJ, and DEA Because ultimately they decided Insys can continue. Not you. While you are at it try to get gas prices lower and free health care for the US!

As to your comment regarding # of rx and usage. Those two are directly proportional. How would more Subsys be used than scripts? Once again, solid math Dr. Phil. I know you do not know much about the physiological chemistry of Fentanyl, but you can’t exactly dose 50 times a day like you can with oxy or hydocodone!

I can’t wait to see what your next fabricated response holds! Hope you can fire it off before the guilty verdict is in!
 






What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Secondly, everyone is as well versed on Insys as you are. By the looks of it though you are easily swayed by the CNN chat rooms amongst other internet cowboys that you partake in. We all have google so slow your role and try reading beyond forum boards.

Is Insys a contributor to the “crisis”, statically no. Not even a drop in the bucket, but because of the revenue they will get pinned. O well. Aimed at a serious problem!? Hahah, you think your anonymous comment has a voice!? If you feel that compelled to solve the crisis put down the mash potatoes and write the FDA, DOJ, and DEA Because ultimately they decided Insys can continue. Not you. While you are at it try to get gas prices lower and free health care for the US!

As to your comment regarding # of rx and usage. Those two are directly proportional. How would more Subsys be used than scripts? Once again, solid math Dr. Phil. I know you do not know much about the physiological chemistry of Fentanyl, but you can’t exactly dose 50 times a day like you can with oxy or hydocodone!

I can’t wait to see what your next fabricated response holds! Hope you can fire it off before the guilty verdict is in!
Two possible ways to go here...
#1
Well done! A flawless parody of the perfect fool.
#2
OK, This is not funny. Whomever has this person's missing medication must return to them it at once.

Nervous? Me? Why do you ask? Not a bit. I'm just a concerned (very) anonymous board member.
Anyone else "concerned" about the voices, roomful of other people, arbitrary point system and the reference to God? No? Alright then, I'm going with my #1 response.....and putting my local police on speed dial.
 






Two possible ways to go here...
#1
Well done! A flawless parody of the perfect fool.
#2
OK, This is not funny. Whomever has this person's missing medication must return to them it at once.

Nervous? Me? Why do you ask? Not a bit. I'm just a concerned (very) anonymous board member.
Anyone else "concerned" about the voices, roomful of other people, arbitrary point system and the reference to God? No? Alright then, I'm going with my #1 response.....and putting my local police on speed dial.

Correction: #2 should read ………..must return it to them at once.

Sorry for the mistake. I feel it's important to be linguistically precise in this particular instance. Why? Oh no special reason.
 












Insys management says " Insys's contribution in opioid crisis is only 0.2% compared to other companies, It means the death caused by Subsys is 2 out of 1000, and that is very small percentage, other 998 persons are killed by other companies, They have a point.

Court should pass a judgement that 0.2 % death are well within acceptable limits and should be allowed, same as manufacturing of vaccines, Vaccine companies are killing 1000's of patients due to adverse effect every year without bribing the doctors, Only difference in case of Insys is "bribing", But who does not bribe? can you mention a single name? So Insys should not be punished.
 






Insys management says " Insys's contribution in opioid crisis is only 0.2% compared to other companies, It means the death caused by Subsys is 2 out of 1000, and that is very small percentage, other 998 persons are killed by other companies, They have a point.

Court should pass a judgement that 0.2 % death are well within acceptable limits and should be allowed, same as manufacturing of vaccines, Vaccine companies are killing 1000's of patients due to adverse effect every year without bribing the doctors, Only difference in case of Insys is "bribing", But who does not bribe? can you mention a single name? So Insys should not be punished.
 






Insys management says " Insys's contribution in opioid crisis is only 0.2% compared to other companies, It means the death caused by Subsys is 2 out of 1000, and that is very small percentage, other 998 persons are killed by other companies, They have a point.

Court should pass a judgement that 0.2 % death are well within acceptable limits and should be allowed, same as manufacturing of vaccines, Vaccine companies are killing 1000's of patients due to adverse effect every year without bribing the doctors, Only difference in case of Insys is "bribing", But who does not bribe? can you mention a single name? So Insys should not be punished.

I dislike that I am spending any time responding to your post. I'm only engaging because I have a fear, probably needless, that someone might actually buy the dangerous brand of misinformation upon which you make your case. That said, I'm going to be brief so as not to waste anymore time than is absolutely necessary.

First, the statement you attribute to Insys's management and put in quotation, does not exist in the public record. Period . Full stop. I refuse to speculate on what you think they said or meant. Moving on, your assertion that Subsy has data that shows 2 out of every 1000 people who take the drug die, is pure fiction.

Adverse event data, such as it exists in the ridiculously flawed FDA, self-reporting system doesn't support this number. It doesn't even calculate such a statistic. I know where you are mis-quoting from and the combination of your sources' poor credibility and your very original, but inaccurate, interpretation of this data, again leaves you with nothing.

Promised I'd be brief. Your "point" about acceptable death rates and vaccines, is bizarre I would need to get a tin foil hat just to re-read it. And I won't.
 






What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Secondly, everyone is as well versed on Insys as you are. By the looks of it though you are easily swayed by the CNN chat rooms amongst other internet cowboys that you partake in. We all have google so slow your role and try reading beyond forum boards.

Is Insys a contributor to the “crisis”, statically no. Not even a drop in the bucket, but because of the revenue they will get pinned. O well. Aimed at a serious problem!? Hahah, you think your anonymous comment has a voice!? If you feel that compelled to solve the crisis put down the mash potatoes and write the FDA, DOJ, and DEA Because ultimately they decided Insys can continue. Not you. While you are at it try to get gas prices lower and free health care for the US!

As to your comment regarding # of rx and usage. Those two are directly proportional. How would more Subsys be used than scripts? Once again, solid math Dr. Phil. I know you do not know much about the physiological chemistry of Fentanyl, but you can’t exactly dose 50 times a day like you can with oxy or hydocodone!

I can’t wait to see what your next fabricated response holds! Hope you can fire it off before the guilty verdict is in!