3 more months....at least!

Anonymous

Guest
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration extended by three months its review of Pfizer Inc's (PFE: 23.75, -0.16, -0.67%) experimental rheumatoid arthritis treatment tofacitinib, one of the most promising new drugs in the company's pipeline.

In July, Pfizer disclosed that the FDA sought a "routine" analysis of clinical trial data for the drug that could delay a decision by three months or more beyond the agency's Aug. 21
deadline.

If approved, the pill could offer a more convenient alternative to Abbott Laboratories Inc's (ABT: 65.58, -0.15, -0.22%) $8 billion-a-year injectable medication Humira. The FDA now views the additional analysis as a major amendment to Pfizer's application for approval, and set a new Nov. 21 deadline for reviewing the drug, the company said on Tuesday. It did not give more details of the data analysis it provided.

Pfizer said it still believes trial results favor the drug's use, and is working with the FDA, as well as regulators in Europe, Japan and other countries, to bring it to market. Rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease, affects about 1.6 million Americans and 23.7 million people worldwide, the company said.

Tofacitinib blocks signals that activate immune and inflammatory responses in the body, and is the first in a new class of drugs called Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. A panel of outside advisers to the FDA recommended the agency approve the drug during a May meeting, though many said it should be used only after patients had tried other treatments. Safety concerns included possible infections, such
as pneumonia, or malignancies. Wall Street analysts estimate that tofacitinib could reap up to $3 billion in annual sales if approved.

Pfizer shares rose 2 cents to $23.91 in premarket trading.


Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/industri...o-review-pfizer-arthritis-drug/#ixzz24CNgwhT2
 












From the way it reads Pfizer has been able show through this new analysis tofacitinib can reduce joint damage which will improve insurance coverage. Now the PI will be able to reflect that. Pfizer is probably happy to hold it back 3 months.
 






From the way it reads Pfizer has been able show through this new analysis tofacitinib can reduce joint damage which will improve insurance coverage. Now the PI will be able to reflect that. Pfizer is probably happy to hold it back 3 months.

I haven't seen anything about reduction in joint damage. Where is that??
Interested in what "major amendment" means?

I would like to see if they offer jobs contingent on approval now. Ironwood Pharma had a similar situation with their new drug for IBS but they extended offers even though there was a 3 month delay(PDUFA date is now Sept7)

There will be some people that stick around cause they have nothing else going on but for others that have to feed their families you may want to be more aggressive in the job search. Remember unless you have an offer, no job is in the bag.
 






Postponement may play to Pfizer's advantage. There's been some serious skepticism whether Pfizer has demonstrated superior efficacy for tofacitinib over currently used drugs. Since it filed its regulatory package, though, the drug company's R&D wing has offered fresh evidence that the treatment can reduce structural damage for patients. Now it has more time to assemble its case for payers as regulators scan the data.*
 






I haven't seen anything about reduction in joint damage. Where is that??
Interested in what "major amendment" means?

I would like to see if they offer jobs contingent on approval now. Ironwood Pharma had a similar situation with their new drug for IBS but they extended offers even though there was a 3 month delay(PDUFA date is now Sept7)

There will be some people that stick around cause they have nothing else going on but for others that have to feed their families you may want to be more aggressive in the job search. Remember unless you have an offer, no job is in the bag.

Structural damage which I'm assuming is joint damage!
 






Postponement may play to Pfizer's advantage. There's been some serious skepticism whether Pfizer has demonstrated superior efficacy for tofacitinib over currently used drugs. Since it filed its regulatory package, though, the drug company's R&D wing has offered fresh evidence that the treatment can reduce structural damage for patients. Now it has more time to assemble its case for payers as regulators scan the data.*

Keep telling yourself that bullshit. Delays are never good regardless of how you spin it. The only positive I see was now they will not be launching around the holidays which is always difficult.
 






Keep telling yourself that bullshit. Delays are never good regardless of how you spin it. The only positive I see was now they will not be launching around the holidays which is always difficult.

Even if approved Nov 21, bet they don't officially launch it till January. Remember, you can't go out and sell off PI anymore and it takes time to put together all the marketing pieces.
 






Even if approved Nov 21, bet they don't officially launch it till January. Remember, you can't go out and sell off PI anymore and it takes time to put together all the marketing pieces.

Since when that you can't sell off the PI???? That's about the only thing you can sell off of. Regardless it's more for prepping for formulary coverage. Some of the insurance plans said before this new analysis that a patient would have to fail on TNF's first before paying for tofacitinib. Now this proves relevance.
 












Since when that you can't sell off the PI???? That's about the only thing you can sell off of. Regardless it's more for prepping for formulary coverage. Some of the insurance plans said before this new analysis that a patient would have to fail on TNF's first before paying for tofacitinib. Now this proves relevance.

Just ask someone who is going to work for Ironwood. Not like the old days where you could just go out with PI right after approval. Lots of things have changed with drug launches

Don't fool yourself either when it comes to insurance. It will take at least 6 months or so before anyone will pay for it and longer for first line.
 






Just ask someone who is going to work for Ironwood. Not like the old days where you could just go out with PI right after approval. Lots of things have changed with drug launches

Don't fool yourself either when it comes to insurance. It will take at least 6 months or so before anyone will pay for it and longer for first line.

Did anyone else get an e-mail from Publicis today asking about current interest in the RA contract position? Why are they stringing us along and still not mentioning the client or the drug? Why don;t they just interview or do the meet and greets and let us go on our way or accept a contingent position?
I guess they are in the driver's seat and they can do what they want to. I will continue to look for other positions until something is finalized with this.
 






Did anyone else get an e-mail from Publicis today asking about current interest in the RA contract position? Why are they stringing us along and still not mentioning the client or the drug? Why don;t they just interview or do the meet and greets and let us go on our way or accept a contingent position?
I guess they are in the driver's seat and they can do what they want to. I will continue to look for other positions until something is finalized with this.

Publicis is not in the driver's seat. It is Pfizer who tells them to string us along and not to tell us who the client or drug are. It's too far out to make it contingent. What happens if Pfizer collects more data by the Nov PUDFA date and it gets delayed again? Just because PUDFA is in Nov does not mean they will launch then. Do you really think they will launch a drug on Thanksgiving? Then you have Christmas 6 weeks later. So you might not even be able to start this gig til Jan. and just cuz it's Pfizer does not mean the job is even worth taking. It's still a f**king contract with no future!
 






Publicis is not in the driver's seat. It is Pfizer who tells them to string us along and not to tell us who the client or drug are. It's too far out to make it contingent. What happens if Pfizer collects more data by the Nov PUDFA date and it gets delayed again? Just because PUDFA is in Nov does not mean they will launch then. Do you really think they will launch a drug on Thanksgiving? Then you have Christmas 6 weeks later. So you might not even be able to start this gig til Jan. and just cuz it's Pfizer does not mean the job is even worth taking. It's still a f**king contract with no future!

Totally agree with this. I just can't believe they will not even say who the client is or what the drug is. COme on they must think we are idiots. This drug may not get approved in November and if it is, it will be launched in January They probably would have home study thru the holidays though. Just don't think it is worth it to not take another job if you have other offers. Keep looking while this situation sorts itself out but you won't hear anything from then until November
 






Totally agree with this. I just can't believe they will not even say who the client is or what the drug is. COme on they must think we are idiots. This drug may not get approved in November and if it is, it will be launched in January They probably would have home study thru the holidays though. Just don't think it is worth it to not take another job if you have other offers. Keep looking while this situation sorts itself out but you won't hear anything from then until November

This all pretty much sucks. :(
 






Publicis is not in the driver's seat. It is Pfizer who tells them to string us along and not to tell us who the client or drug are. It's too far out to make it contingent. What happens if Pfizer collects more data by the Nov PUDFA date and it gets delayed again? Just because PUDFA is in Nov does not mean they will launch then. Do you really think they will launch a drug on Thanksgiving? Then you have Christmas 6 weeks later. So you might not even be able to start this gig til Jan. and just cuz it's Pfizer does not mean the job is even worth taking. It's still a f**king contract with no future!

REALLY? BE OUT OF WORK 20 MONTHS WITH NO INSURANCE AND CANCER(LIKE ME) AND YOU'LL BE THRILLED TO WAIT 3 MONTHS FOR A JOB AND TAKE A CONTRACT.
 






REALLY? BE OUT OF WORK 20 MONTHS WITH NO INSURANCE AND CANCER(LIKE ME) AND YOU'LL BE THRILLED TO WAIT 3 MONTHS FOR A JOB AND TAKE A CONTRACT.

I hope you don't have that attitude when you go into your final interview. I would guess that is why you have been out of work so long...I can see it in your writings. I imiagine you think it doesn't show in a face to face but it does. Gets rid of the CAPs and the attitude and you may have a shot at this whenever it is approved.
 






I hope you don't have that attitude when you go into your final interview. I would guess that is why you have been out of work so long...I can see it in your writings. I imiagine you think it doesn't show in a face to face but it does. Gets rid of the CAPs and the attitude and you may have a shot at this whenever it is approved.

GO F YOURSELF NIMROD
 












The truth hurts doesn't it!

Its okay if he wants to wait to take the contract job. It's a fine temp job which may or may not have a future.

One thing to watch out for - try not to become a career pharma rep. Ther is a point of diminishing returns to the company after you get to a certain salary point. You can't move up to a higher level position and the company sees no benefit to keep paying you more. So, very early on in your pharma career you need to took for alternative careers.