21st Century Democrats using tragedy to fundraise! Disgusting.

Translation: My mode of attack didn't go exactly as I planned, now I am trying to distract everyones attention.

Puddin, I won't lose any sleep not knowing what you think. I know you had no intention on taking a position. That isn't how you work. You really have no principles other than putting your party first, you want to reserve the right to bitch about any and everything you want. If you actually take a position on something, that might keep you from doing so.

But, you have been exposed here. No bother responding, I know you won't admit that. You will run off and chest bump BrokebackChancre in your ritualistic CafePharma Somali Butt Pirate way and declare victory like you always do



Translation: ILHaiti will do and say anything to justify continuing his cutnrun tactic to avoid getting smoked when his failure to back up his "facts" blows up in his face on the other thread.


Look Precious, you wont get an answer from me on this thread. If the OP asks, he will get, but he first has to answer a point blank question as to if the adjective "disgusting" applies to the what the Tea Party fundraising letter.

Hiding behind someone's skirt attempting to throw a lifelife to him wont cut it. This "the dems letter was over the top" wont cut it unless he or anyone else throwing him a lifeline defines the "disgusting" dividing line.

Toodles.
:D
 






You cannot possibly be that dense. The stories have been very clear that the arrow and bullseye are added - but read the text, see the "incendiary" words of placing a bullseye on the blue dog dems, bolding their names for targeting. You can absolutely NEVER admit the left's errors.

http://www.examiner.com/post-partis...daily-kos-put-bullseye-on-dead-to-me-giffords

http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.c...-kos-put-a-bulls-eye-on-rep-giffords-in-2008/


I dont care what that other thread says...it was a LIE too.

Here is the original Daily Kos diary from 2008.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/25/541568/-2010-will-be-primary-season


Do you see a BULLSEYE emblazzened on there? Huh? Huh?

Was Giffords specifically picture on there? Huh? Huh?

Now, look at your wing nut liar blog who PHOTOSHOPPED a bullseye on there to imply any violent intent on those listed to primary.


http://hillbuzz.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/screen-shot-2011-01-08-at-3-05-33-pm.png


Look at the title of YOUR source:

"BREAKING: DAILY KOS PUT A “BULLS-EYE” ON REP. GIFFORDS IN 2008"

ummmmm.........NO THEY DIDNT, you idiot!

Now, you should feel USED and stupid for even repeating it again.

Now, go away if have any shame from being thoroughy embarrased on this.
 






Your valium dose is overdue. You are wrong, are splitting hairs, and are completed deluded if you think this is any different from Palin's message. You just can't bear to admit that this is standard political fare because that would require you to either admit you were wrong and to realize Palin's not the devil, or to admit that Kos, your liberal home base, is wrong and you can do neither. Just like you cannot reveal your position on the matter of this thread, using the tragedy for fundraising. No, you can only vilify the other side and cannot budge at all from thinking libbies are destined for sainthood by your messiah obama.

From your post:

Who to primary? Well, I'd argue that we can narrow the target list by looking at those Democrats who sold out the Constitution last week. I've bolded members of the Blue Dogs for added emphasis.

Ackerman, Gary (NY-05)
Altmire, Jason (PA-04)
Arcuri, Mike (NY-24)
Baca, Joe (CA-43)

Baird, Brian (WA-03)
Barrow, John (GA-12)
Bean, Melissa (IL-08)

Berkley, Shelley (NV-01)
Berman, Howard (CA-28)
Berry, Marion (AR-01)
Bishop, Sanford (GA-02)

Bishop, Timothy (NY-01)
Boren, Dan (OK-02)
Boswell, Leonard (IA-03)

Boucher, Rick (VA-09)
Boyd, Allen (FL-02)
Boyda, Nancy (KS-02)
Brown, Corrine (FL-03)
Butterfield, G.K. (NC-01)
Cardoza, Dennis (CA-18)
Carney, Chris (PA-10)
Castor, Kathy (FL-11)
Cazayoux, Don (LA-06)
Chandler, Ben (KY-06)
Childers, Travis (MS-01)
Cleaver, Emanuel (MO-05)
Clyburn, James (SC-06)
Cooper, Jim (TN-05)
Costa, Jim (CA-20)
Cramer, Bud (AL-05)
Crowley, Joe (NY-07)
Cuellar, Henry (TX-28)
Davis, Artur (AL-07)
Davis, Lincoln (TN-04)
Dicks, Norman (WA-06)
Donnelly, Joe (IN-02)
Edwards, Chet (TX-17)
Ellsworth, Brad (IN-08)
Emanuel, Rahm (IL-05)
Engel, Elliot (NY-17)
Etheridge, Bob (NC-02)
Giffords, Gabrielle (AZ-08)
Gillibrand, Kirsten (NY-20)
Gordon, Bart (TN-06)

Green, AL (TX-09)
Green, Gene (TX-29)
Gutierrez, Luis (IL-04)
Harman, Jane (CA-36)
Hastings, Alcee (FL-23)
Herseth Sandlin, S. (SD-AL)
Higgins, Brian (NY-27)
Hinojosa, Ruben (TX-15)
Holden, Tim (PA-17)
Hoyer, Steny (MD-05)
Kanjorski, Paul (PA-11)
Kildee, Dale (MI-05)
Kind, Ron (WI-03)
Klein, Ron (FL-22)
Lampson, Nick (TX-22)
Langevin, JIm (RI-02)
Lipinski, Dan (IL-03)
Lowey, Nita (NY-18)
Mahoney, Tim (FL-16)
Marshall, Jim (GA-08)
Matheson, Jim (UT-02)

McCarthy, Carolyn (NY-04)
McIntyre, Mike (NC-07)
McNerney, Jerry (CA-11)
Meeks, Gregory (NY-06)
Melancon, Charlie (LA-03)
Mitchell, Harry (AZ-05)
Moore, Dennis (KS-03)
Murphy, Patrick (PA-08)

Murtha, John (PA-12)
Ortiz, Solomon (TX-27)
Nancy Pelosi (CA-08)
Perlmutter, Ed (CO-07)
Peterson, Colin (MN-07)
Pomeroy, Earl (ND-AL)
Rahall, Nick (WV-03)
Reyes, Silvestre (TX-16)
Richardson, Laura (CA-37)
Rodriguez, Ciro (TX-23)
Ross, Mike (AR-04)
Ruppesberger, Dutch (MD-02)
Salazar, John (CO-03)
Schiff, Adam (CA-29)
Scott, David (GA-13)

Sestak, Joe (PA-07)
Sherman, Brad (CA-27)
Shuler, Heath (NC-11)
Sires, Albio (NJ-13)
Skelton, Ike (MO-04)
Smith, Adam (WA-09)
Snyder, Vic (AR-02)
Space, Zach (OH-18)
Spratt, John (SC-05)
Stupak, Bart (MI-01)
Tanner, John (TN-08)
Ellen Tauscher (CA-10)
Taylor, Gene (MS-04)
Thompson, Bennie (MS-02)
Udall, Mark (CO-02)
Wilson, Charles (OH-06)
Yarmuth, John (KY-03

Not all of these people will get or even deserve primaries, but this vote certainly puts a bulls eye on their district. If we can field enough serious challengers, and if we repeat the Donna Edwards and Joe Lieberman stories a few more times, well then, our elected officials might have no choice but to be more responsive. Because if we show them that their AT&T lobbyist buddies can't save their jobs, they'll pay more attention to those who can.

So because this shows the same language in chart form, it is AOK, right? They placed a bullseye on ever person on the list, with special emphasis on those bolded. Damned, you will buy anything the libbies are selling.
 
Last edited by a moderator:






Your valium dose is overdue. You are wrong, are splitting hairs, and are completed deluded if you think this is any different from Palin's message. You just can't bear to admit that this is standard political fare because that would require you to either admit you were wrong and to realize Palin's not the devil, or to admit that Kos, your liberal home base, is wrong and you can do neither. Just like you cannot reveal your position on the matter of this thread, using the tragedy for fundraising. No, you can only vilify the other side and cannot budge at all from thinking libbies are destined for sainthood by your messiah obama.

From your post:

Who to primary? Well, I'd argue that we can narrow the target list by looking at those Democrats who sold out the Constitution last week. I've bolded members of the Blue Dogs for added emphasis.

Ackerman, Gary (NY-05)
Altmire, Jason (PA-04)
Arcuri, Mike (NY-24)
Baca, Joe (CA-43)

Baird, Brian (WA-03)
Barrow, John (GA-12)
Bean, Melissa (IL-08)

Berkley, Shelley (NV-01)
Berman, Howard (CA-28)
Berry, Marion (AR-01)
Bishop, Sanford (GA-02)

Bishop, Timothy (NY-01)
Boren, Dan (OK-02)
Boswell, Leonard (IA-03)

Boucher, Rick (VA-09)
Boyd, Allen (FL-02)
Boyda, Nancy (KS-02)
Brown, Corrine (FL-03)
Butterfield, G.K. (NC-01)
Cardoza, Dennis (CA-18)
Carney, Chris (PA-10)
Castor, Kathy (FL-11)
Cazayoux, Don (LA-06)
Chandler, Ben (KY-06)
Childers, Travis (MS-01)
Cleaver, Emanuel (MO-05)
Clyburn, James (SC-06)
Cooper, Jim (TN-05)
Costa, Jim (CA-20)
Cramer, Bud (AL-05)
Crowley, Joe (NY-07)
Cuellar, Henry (TX-28)
Davis, Artur (AL-07)
Davis, Lincoln (TN-04)
Dicks, Norman (WA-06)
Donnelly, Joe (IN-02)
Edwards, Chet (TX-17)
Ellsworth, Brad (IN-08)
Emanuel, Rahm (IL-05)
Engel, Elliot (NY-17)
Etheridge, Bob (NC-02)
Giffords, Gabrielle (AZ-08)
Gillibrand, Kirsten (NY-20)
Gordon, Bart (TN-06)

Green, AL (TX-09)
Green, Gene (TX-29)
Gutierrez, Luis (IL-04)
Harman, Jane (CA-36)
Hastings, Alcee (FL-23)
Herseth Sandlin, S. (SD-AL)
Higgins, Brian (NY-27)
Hinojosa, Ruben (TX-15)
Holden, Tim (PA-17)
Hoyer, Steny (MD-05)
Kanjorski, Paul (PA-11)
Kildee, Dale (MI-05)
Kind, Ron (WI-03)
Klein, Ron (FL-22)
Lampson, Nick (TX-22)
Langevin, JIm (RI-02)
Lipinski, Dan (IL-03)
Lowey, Nita (NY-18)
Mahoney, Tim (FL-16)
Marshall, Jim (GA-08)
Matheson, Jim (UT-02)

McCarthy, Carolyn (NY-04)
McIntyre, Mike (NC-07)
McNerney, Jerry (CA-11)
Meeks, Gregory (NY-06)
Melancon, Charlie (LA-03)
Mitchell, Harry (AZ-05)
Moore, Dennis (KS-03)
Murphy, Patrick (PA-08)

Murtha, John (PA-12)
Ortiz, Solomon (TX-27)
Nancy Pelosi (CA-08)
Perlmutter, Ed (CO-07)
Peterson, Colin (MN-07)
Pomeroy, Earl (ND-AL)
Rahall, Nick (WV-03)
Reyes, Silvestre (TX-16)
Richardson, Laura (CA-37)
Rodriguez, Ciro (TX-23)
Ross, Mike (AR-04)
Ruppesberger, Dutch (MD-02)
Salazar, John (CO-03)
Schiff, Adam (CA-29)
Scott, David (GA-13)

Sestak, Joe (PA-07)
Sherman, Brad (CA-27)
Shuler, Heath (NC-11)
Sires, Albio (NJ-13)
Skelton, Ike (MO-04)
Smith, Adam (WA-09)
Snyder, Vic (AR-02)
Space, Zach (OH-18)
Spratt, John (SC-05)
Stupak, Bart (MI-01)
Tanner, John (TN-08)
Ellen Tauscher (CA-10)
Taylor, Gene (MS-04)
Thompson, Bennie (MS-02)
Udall, Mark (CO-02)
Wilson, Charles (OH-06)
Yarmuth, John (KY-03

Not all of these people will get or even deserve primaries, but this vote certainly puts a bulls eye on their district. If we can field enough serious challengers, and if we repeat the Donna Edwards and Joe Lieberman stories a few more times, well then, our elected officials might have no choice but to be more responsive. Because if we show them that their AT&T lobbyist buddies can't save their jobs, they'll pay more attention to those who can.

So because this shows the same language in chart form, it is AOK, right? They placed a bullseye on ever person on the list, with special emphasis on those bolded. Damned, you will buy anything the libbies are selling.


Rah Row. Another bitch slapping for you RAB.
 












Your valium dose is overdue. You are wrong, are splitting hairs, and are completed deluded if you think this is any different from Palin's message. You just can't bear to admit that this is standard political fare because that would require you to either admit you were wrong and to realize Palin's not the devil, or to admit that Kos, your liberal home base, is wrong and you can do neither. Just like you cannot reveal your position on the matter of this thread, using the tragedy for fundraising. No, you can only vilify the other side and cannot budge at all from thinking libbies are destined for sainthood by your messiah obama.

From your post:

Who to primary? Well, I'd argue that we can narrow the target list by looking at those Democrats who sold out the Constitution last week. I've bolded members of the Blue Dogs for added emphasis.

Ackerman, Gary (NY-05)
Altmire, Jason (PA-04)
Arcuri, Mike (NY-24)
Baca, Joe (CA-43)

Baird, Brian (WA-03)
Barrow, John (GA-12)
Bean, Melissa (IL-08)

Berkley, Shelley (NV-01)
Berman, Howard (CA-28)
Berry, Marion (AR-01)
Bishop, Sanford (GA-02)

Bishop, Timothy (NY-01)
Boren, Dan (OK-02)
Boswell, Leonard (IA-03)

Boucher, Rick (VA-09)
Boyd, Allen (FL-02)
Boyda, Nancy (KS-02)
Brown, Corrine (FL-03)
Butterfield, G.K. (NC-01)
Cardoza, Dennis (CA-18)
Carney, Chris (PA-10)
Castor, Kathy (FL-11)
Cazayoux, Don (LA-06)
Chandler, Ben (KY-06)
Childers, Travis (MS-01)
Cleaver, Emanuel (MO-05)
Clyburn, James (SC-06)
Cooper, Jim (TN-05)
Costa, Jim (CA-20)
Cramer, Bud (AL-05)
Crowley, Joe (NY-07)
Cuellar, Henry (TX-28)
Davis, Artur (AL-07)
Davis, Lincoln (TN-04)
Dicks, Norman (WA-06)
Donnelly, Joe (IN-02)
Edwards, Chet (TX-17)
Ellsworth, Brad (IN-08)
Emanuel, Rahm (IL-05)
Engel, Elliot (NY-17)
Etheridge, Bob (NC-02)
Giffords, Gabrielle (AZ-08)
Gillibrand, Kirsten (NY-20)
Gordon, Bart (TN-06)

Green, AL (TX-09)
Green, Gene (TX-29)
Gutierrez, Luis (IL-04)
Harman, Jane (CA-36)
Hastings, Alcee (FL-23)
Herseth Sandlin, S. (SD-AL)
Higgins, Brian (NY-27)
Hinojosa, Ruben (TX-15)
Holden, Tim (PA-17)
Hoyer, Steny (MD-05)
Kanjorski, Paul (PA-11)
Kildee, Dale (MI-05)
Kind, Ron (WI-03)
Klein, Ron (FL-22)
Lampson, Nick (TX-22)
Langevin, JIm (RI-02)
Lipinski, Dan (IL-03)
Lowey, Nita (NY-18)
Mahoney, Tim (FL-16)
Marshall, Jim (GA-08)
Matheson, Jim (UT-02)

McCarthy, Carolyn (NY-04)
McIntyre, Mike (NC-07)
McNerney, Jerry (CA-11)
Meeks, Gregory (NY-06)
Melancon, Charlie (LA-03)
Mitchell, Harry (AZ-05)
Moore, Dennis (KS-03)
Murphy, Patrick (PA-08)

Murtha, John (PA-12)
Ortiz, Solomon (TX-27)
Nancy Pelosi (CA-08)
Perlmutter, Ed (CO-07)
Peterson, Colin (MN-07)
Pomeroy, Earl (ND-AL)
Rahall, Nick (WV-03)
Reyes, Silvestre (TX-16)
Richardson, Laura (CA-37)
Rodriguez, Ciro (TX-23)
Ross, Mike (AR-04)
Ruppesberger, Dutch (MD-02)
Salazar, John (CO-03)
Schiff, Adam (CA-29)
Scott, David (GA-13)

Sestak, Joe (PA-07)
Sherman, Brad (CA-27)
Shuler, Heath (NC-11)
Sires, Albio (NJ-13)
Skelton, Ike (MO-04)
Smith, Adam (WA-09)
Snyder, Vic (AR-02)
Space, Zach (OH-18)
Spratt, John (SC-05)
Stupak, Bart (MI-01)
Tanner, John (TN-08)
Ellen Tauscher (CA-10)
Taylor, Gene (MS-04)
Thompson, Bennie (MS-02)
Udall, Mark (CO-02)
Wilson, Charles (OH-06)
Yarmuth, John (KY-03

Not all of these people will get or even deserve primaries, but this vote certainly puts a bulls eye on their district. If we can field enough serious challengers, and if we repeat the Donna Edwards and Joe Lieberman stories a few more times, well then, our elected officials might have no choice but to be more responsive. Because if we show them that their AT&T lobbyist buddies can't save their jobs, they'll pay more attention to those who can.

So because this shows the same language in chart form, it is AOK, right? They placed a bullseye on ever person on the list, with special emphasis on those bolded. Damned, you will buy anything the libbies are selling.


The only one deluded is YOU. You've got to be kidding me when the OP is running from a direct question applying the same standard he uses for the liberal fundraising letter to the teaparty and YOU made a lame attempt to explain why the liberal fundraising appeal is different from the tea party's.

Self awareness is definitely NOT your strong suit and its on display for all to see.


Now again, Daily Kos did not place an image of a bulls eye on that dairy. YOUR source did. The diarist used the WORD "bulls eye". If that word was so terrible, then maybe you can explain to us the need to PHOTOSHOP one along side a picture of Gifford? You think you can handle that one sweety? I bet you will twist logic in all sorts of knots in a lame attempt too.


But lets back up for a moment and the use of the word "bulls eye". I will go to the dictionary and provide that definition for you:



bull's-eye or bull's eye (blz)
n.
1.
a. The small central circle on a target.
b. A shot that hits this circle.
2.
a. A direct hit: scored a bull's-eye on the window with a snowball.
b. The precise accomplishment of a goal or purpose: "With his overflowing style, [he] almost always hits the bull's-eye of universality" (William Zimmer).
3. A thick, circular piece of glass set, as in a roof or ship's deck, to admit light.
4. A circular opening or window.
5.
a. A planoconvex lens used to concentrate light.
b. A lantern or lamp having such a lens.
6. A piece of round hard candy.​
There are multiple uses for the word and very few of them relate to guns, weaponry, and violence.

Now, why dont you tell us what other uses were there for an image of "crosshairs" that Palin used on her site.

Until you do....UTTER FAIL!