2010: 34th Consecutive Year Of Above Avergage Global Temps

It is true and I am relaxing - Won't need any Coppertone as I head out for some skiing later - We have way above average temps and spring like conditions on the slopes.

:D


Actually, you can get a nice sunburn while skiing. The sun reflects off of the snow puddin.

But, back to the topic at hand. You don't seem so relaxed. What exactly are you trying to accomplish with all of your climate data and global warming threads?

Are you trying to convert us in to believers? Are you global warmings version of a Seventh Day Adventist? You and DocWho ride around on bicycles in your white shirts and ties with copies of Al Gores book trying to spread the gospel of AGW?
 






Actually, you can get a nice sunburn while skiing. The sun reflects off of the snow puddin.

But, back to the topic at hand. You don't seem so relaxed. What exactly are you trying to accomplish with all of your climate data and global warming threads?

Are you trying to convert us in to believers? Are you global warmings version of a Seventh Day Adventist? You and DocWho ride around on bicycles in your white shirts and ties with copies of Al Gores book trying to spread the gospel of AGW?

Just bitch slapping you AGW deniers on a daily basis with something you aren't all that familiar with - Facts and proven data.

Now, go bak to watching FOX News and try to come up with a better response next time, foamball.
 






Not even close. You people do not have enough climate data to ever prove that humans are causing this change. Sorry, you are delusional, and I think if you are intellectually honest (which you aren't) you would have to admit that.

Yeah, I would but remember I'm part of the totalitarian global warming hoax, and in an effort to gain control over all aspects of your life this is my hustle. I'm one of the global warming pimps; I'm not delusional at all, but diabolical...yes Muhuhuhahahaaaaaaaa.
 






Get back to me when you have enough data to make any claims about climate change being caused by humans...until then you just look stupid, like the rest of the chicken hawks that run around here screaming the sky is falling. They can tell you nuts anything can't they?

For that comment no passing gas for a week, your hot air contributes way too much to AGW, keep it up as see what I take away next.
 






Manmade AGW has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and man has been caught red handed with the murder weapon and all sweet cheeks.

Uh, no, it hasn't. But since the "scientists" have conveniently "misplaced" the evidence, we have to take their word for it, right? I mean it's not as if they have ever been caught committing fraud or anything, right?

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-p...mategate-global-warming-computer-programming-

Uh, well, OK so they did commit fraud. But at least they didn't send e-mails to one another to cover up their fraud, right?

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs...how-scientists-may-have-cooked-the-facts.html

Uh....well, OK, so what if they conspired to lie about the results. That still doesn't mean AGW isn't real, right?...Well, I...uh.....

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/06/ice-ages-or-20th-century-warming-it-all-comes-down-to-causation/


You want more? Why do you think so many people don't believe in the Easter Bunny or the Tooth Fairy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:












Watch what the next congress takes away dahlin'. Enjoy.

Oh I'm sure the rethug congress will strip away more of our rights and ability to make a meaningful living as well as retirement as usual. I'll survive those cronies as I always do hun. Now the environment won't be so lucky though.
 












Isn't funny how there is "normal" weather for Libtards, but never a "normal" person? Libtards are always decrying "normal." "What is normal for you isn't for someone else." But for weather, there is some sort of "normal."

Just wondering, who defines "average?"

chirp chirp chirp
 






Isn't funny how there is "normal" weather for Libtards, but never a "normal" person? Libtards are always decrying "normal." "What is normal for you isn't for someone else." But for weather, there is some sort of "normal."

Just wondering, who defines "average?"

chirp chirp chirp

You're right, you should take a trip to Venus and see how that 'normal' weather works out fer ya.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqFVxWfVtoo
 
Last edited by a moderator:






You're right, you should take a trip to Venus and see how that 'normal' weather works out fer ya.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqFVxWfVtoo

This thread really knocked the deniers like MA and Bursted Bubble around as evident by their incoherent responses. The fact remains that 2010 was the 34th consecutive year of above average global temps. The facts and date are there but yet these dolts continue to squirm around in their vain attempts to spin the truth.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/#temp

http://content.usatoday.com/communi...ar-on-record-climate-change-global-warming-/1

But then again, I can somewhat understand the deniers and why they are so convoluted in their thought process as regards to AGW. It was a FOX News boss who ordered staffers to cast doubt on climate change science and we all know the ConCLowns here get their walking orders and talking points from FOX.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/15/fox-news-climate-change-email_n_796963.html
 






i dont know if any of u have seen whats going on in australia, but after overcoming THE worst drought they now are suffering horrible rains, deep flooding. climate change is real and its happening now and man is 2 blame
 






i dont know if any of u have seen whats going on in australia, but after overcoming THE worst drought they now are suffering horrible rains, deep flooding. climate change is real and its happening now and man is 2 blame
I notice your sentence is not complete as indicated by the lack of a period. Surely you meant to continue your sentence with your proof that man is 2 blame. You can prove that, can't you?

BTW, the floods are in Queensland...the rainiest state in Australia. Newsflash: Rain happens in rainy areas.

The drought to which you refer was elsewhere...largely New South Wales and Victoria. That drought was attributed to El Nino.

And, NO, El Nino is not a person who causes climate change.
 






I notice your sentence is not complete as indicated by the lack of a period. Surely you meant to continue your sentence with your proof that man is 2 blame. You can prove that, can't you?

BTW, the floods are in Queensland...the rainiest state in Australia. Newsflash: Rain happens in rainy areas.

The drought to which you refer was elsewhere...largely New South Wales and Victoria. That drought was attributed to El Nino.

And, NO, El Nino is not a person who causes climate change.

no the rains r in the areas where the drought was and it is typically a rainy area ur correct but rainy isnt what theyve been experiencing thats like saying new orleans had some rain during katrina
 






no the rains r in the areas where the drought was and it is typically a rainy area ur correct but rainy isnt what theyve been experiencing thats like saying new orleans had some rain during katrina
Seriously, I don't know where you got your talking points, but they are not consistent with facts...not a problem for you, I'm sure.

Let's see what they are saying down under: Australia recorded its wettest spring on record for the 2010 September to November period....Northern and eastern parts of the country have continued to receive above to very much above average rainfall, with Queensland, New South Wales and the NT all recording their wettest spring on record. All states recorded above average rainfall for spring, with all states except Tasmania recording totals placing them in their ten wettest springs on record.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/drought/drought.shtml

Caution: I have spent substantially more time in Australia than you have. You want to be sure you have FACTS if you want to challenge me on this. Your talking points just won't work.
 






Seriously, I don't know where you got your talking points, but they are not consistent with facts...not a problem for you, I'm sure.

Let's see what they are saying down under: Australia recorded its wettest spring on record for the 2010 September to November period....Northern and eastern parts of the country have continued to receive above to very much above average rainfall, with Queensland, New South Wales and the NT all recording their wettest spring on record. All states recorded above average rainfall for spring, with all states except Tasmania recording totals placing them in their ten wettest springs on record.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/drought/drought.shtml

Caution: I have spent substantially more time in Australia than you have. You want to be sure you have FACTS if you want to challenge me on this. Your talking points just won't work.

Accuracy has never been one of AD's goals.
 






You are such a sad, pathetic fucking idiot. 34 years??? Is that all you got? Really? Really? It's YOU who needs to take a step outside and realize that 34years of the Earf's life is just a nano-second of time. I feel embarrassed for idiots like you you push global warming like a blind sheep.

Did you hear they just found the OLDEST human remains EVER in Israel last week. 400,000 years old. It absolutely destroys the myth that homo-sapiens EVOLVED 200,000 years ago.

Just trying to give a sad case like you some perspective.


Last I checked, 34 consecutive years does consitute a TREND.

In case you don't know the definition of 'trend', perhaps this will be helpful to you:


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/trend

And yes, I do believe that humans are contributing to climate change.
 






You are such a sad, pathetic fucking idiot. 34 years??? Is that all you got? Really? Really? It's YOU who needs to take a step outside and realize that 34years of the Earf's life is just a nano-second of time. I feel embarrassed for idiots like you you push global warming like a blind sheep.

Did you hear they just found the OLDEST human remains EVER in Israel last week. 400,000 years old. It absolutely destroys the myth that homo-sapiens EVOLVED 200,000 years ago.

Just trying to give a sad case like you some perspective.

No perspective needed, especially from the likes of a mental midget like you.

34 Years and counting . . .

Now, take your perspective and shove it up your ass. You are nothing but a piece of human debris.
 






No perspective needed, especially from the likes of a mental midget like you.

34 Years and counting . . .

Now, take your perspective and shove it up your ass. You are nothing but a piece of human debris.


Why do you believe so strongly in this? Do you have any doubts at all that they "experts" might be wrong?

Does it give you any pause at all that the biggest champion of man made global warming stands to make billions off of it?
 






Why do you believe so strongly in this? Do you have any doubts at all that they "experts" might be wrong?

Does it give you any pause at all that the biggest champion of man made global warming stands to make billions off of it?

Your so called 'experts' may also be wrong - I believe that man has had a definate effect on climate - the degree can be debated.

34 years and counting . . .