vest trial

Quote
















Doesn’t matter how Zoll spins this... no insurance company will pay for it!
Was and will always be a total scam.
Any ex life vest rep wronged by this company is celebrating!
Layoffs Monday for sure.
Did someone say Bob G had a big house with a big mortgage?
Maybe it will be for sale in the near future and if the bank takes it....
 


















anonymous said:
Doesn’t matter how Zoll spins this... no insurance company will pay for it!
Was and will always be a total scam.
Any ex life vest rep wronged by this company is celebrating!
Layoffs Monday for sure.
Did someone say Bob G had a big house with a big mortgage?
Maybe it will be for sale in the near future and if the bank takes it....
Click to expand...

Bob G is not responsible for the bad results of the trial. He is a big bible thumping douche that made an absolute mess of this company and lots of peoples lives, but had nothing to do with the vest trial! I am sure he had a hand in on pre-certifying on data that we all knew was total bull. JW has always been the biggest moron and the only thing that can make this day better is an oig raid on Zoll and all in hand cuffs.
As far as all the other minions... karma will come full circle.
 






One small consolation is this: pharma and some device companies know that Zoll TMs are good prospects. Solid cardiology experience and battle hardened from their Zoll experience. Don’t wait for the other shoe to drop. Start networking now. You can be sure that Bobby G and the ADs will be trying to placate all of us until the moment the reorg is announced. Don’t get lulled into a false sense of security for one minute. Head for the doors.
 






Why are we getting all the great press from Bernie and AD about how wonderful this total mort thing is? Now it's oh, we may have mis identified the cause of death. BS! You cannot go back after a trial and change the parameters. Anyone else concerned? .
 






What else are they going to do at this point but spin it. Did anyone else notice the statistically significant reduction in stroke death “due” to the LifeVest. What if you removed those deaths (4 in control and 0 in LV arms) that were clearly due to chance and not LifeVest from the all cause mortality number? Would the result still be statistically significant for all cause mortality? It’s clear this trial was flawed as it took 10 years to complete a trial on a product worn for 90 days. I don’t think this is the complete end of LifeVest as physicians will continue to prescribe for only the most severe low EF or those that have ectopy in the hospital. Quite a stretch to call this a positive result though.

Regardless of whether you believe the mortality result is real, I’d want to see 1 yr data from this trial (not WEARIT-II) to show these patients will not just die anyway.
 



anonymous said:
What else are they going to do at this point but spin it. Did anyone else notice the statistically significant reduction in stroke death “due” to the LifeVest. What if you removed those deaths (4 in control and 0 in LV arms) that were clearly due to chance and not LifeVest from the all cause mortality number? Would the result still be statistically significant for all cause mortality? It’s clear this trial was flawed as it took 10 years to complete a trial on a product worn for 90 days. I don’t think this is the complete end of LifeVest as physicians will continue to prescribe for only the most severe low EF or those that have ectopy in the hospital. Quite a stretch to call this a positive result though.

Regardless of whether you believe the mortality result is real, I’d want to see 1 yr data from this trial (not WEARIT-II) to show these patients will not just die anyway.
Click to expand...
They are acting like this is the most important trial with better than expected results even though it failed....wtf
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote