So WP has been trying to sell B+L for five years. Within hours of selling just before signing on the dotted line someone from the inner circle leaks that a 9 billion dollar deal is just about done.
If the deal goes through good for B+L and the new company.
If a deal does not go through there is a big problem here. 9 Billion or even 8 Billion is a fair deal so if Valeant is interested the deal goes through.
If a deal does not go through than Valeant may be a player in an elaborate ruse to attempt to pump up the estimated value of B+L before the IPO.
If the story at the end of next week is WP almost sold B+L to Valeant for 9 billion but Valeant walked due to undisclosed reasons the wall street journal should run a story on the games that CEOs play to try to pump up the value of companies prior to an IPO.
I hope this is a real story. But if it is a game to screw the small investor out of their cash I hope the investment community give the small investor the real story before the IPO. It is not fair to the small investor to give them false information before an IPO.
If the deal goes through good for B+L and the new company.
If a deal does not go through there is a big problem here. 9 Billion or even 8 Billion is a fair deal so if Valeant is interested the deal goes through.
If a deal does not go through than Valeant may be a player in an elaborate ruse to attempt to pump up the estimated value of B+L before the IPO.
If the story at the end of next week is WP almost sold B+L to Valeant for 9 billion but Valeant walked due to undisclosed reasons the wall street journal should run a story on the games that CEOs play to try to pump up the value of companies prior to an IPO.
I hope this is a real story. But if it is a game to screw the small investor out of their cash I hope the investment community give the small investor the real story before the IPO. It is not fair to the small investor to give them false information before an IPO.