why class-warfare taxes are misguided
- Thread starter ~T~
- Start date
The question is how much of a tax increase is being talked about? It it is a return to Clinton era tax rates, then nobody, not even teabaggers and Grover Norquist should be crying and hand wringing and whining. If on the other hand the rates would go back to the Eisenhower years of 91% at the top bracket, then that could be another story.
OK fine. You folks are enamored with the Clinton years and think they were the best thing since sliced bread then I have a deal for you.
I will agree to go back to Clinton era tax rates if you agree to go back to Clinton era spending levels.
Deal?
libluvsbukkake
Well-Known Member
- libluvsbukkake Aug 18, 2011 at 09:02: AM
libluvsbukkake
Well-Known Member
Why not? We are about to celebrate the 10th anniversary, of the result of Clinton's defense cuts. Airman Who will no doubt be honoring his beloved Muslims that day.
This is really the crux of most of the differences between Liberals and Conservatives isn't it? What programs are necessary?
All of the rest is just commentary.
It's actually Vietnam War Hero Airman Who.
It makes one wonder if, when Airman Alvin Greene's CO called for him, did people respond by saying "Airman Who?"
Well at lest I volunteered during war time. I doubt the same can be said for you war heroes.
US Army, 1967-1970. CPT, TC.
Interesting that not one left wing fleebagger will take me up on my compromise to go back to their precious Clinton years.
If the feckless GOP were smart , they would make just such an offer and show Odummy for the socialist that he is.
Is this an admission that the fleebagers don't believe the Clinton years were all that great?
Why wouldn't they want to go back to the tax rates and budget of Clinton that led to all those supposed surpluses the fleebaggers brag about?