Who closes the doors first Natera or Harmony?

















This is such a waste of life even responding to this non sense. Neither will close the doors. Natera just filed for an IPO and have a future in oncology. Roche is a large enough company to sustain anything. The fact that both tests are the only two on the market that actually add value to a clinic should tell you that both will be around. Sequenom sucks and fluffs all their data, and every other company just repackages illumina's crappy test and gives it a different name. The 16 other companies that do that (Quest, labcorp, progenity, good start etc.) are the joke of the industry.
 






This is such a waste of life even responding to this non sense. Neither will close the doors. Natera just filed for an IPO and have a future in oncology. Roche is a large enough company to sustain anything. The fact that both tests are the only two on the market that actually add value to a clinic should tell you that both will be around. Sequenom sucks and fluffs all their data, and every other company just repackages illumina's crappy test and gives it a different name. The 16 other companies that do that (Quest, labcorp, progenity, good start etc.) are the joke of the industry.

How do you come up with this crap???
 






This is such a waste of life even responding to this non sense. Neither will close the doors. Natera just filed for an IPO and have a future in oncology. Roche is a large enough company to sustain anything. The fact that both tests are the only two on the market that actually add value to a clinic should tell you that both will be around. Sequenom sucks and fluffs all their data, and every other company just repackages illumina's crappy test and gives it a different name. The 16 other companies that do that (Quest, labcorp, progenity, good start etc.) are the joke of the industry.

Why do you always fluff natera up so much that it's obviously nauseating.