Which is worse? AHM or the fools that fell for it?

Quote

Anonymous

Guest
I cannot tell you how much time I have spent (wasted) on this company and utilizing the PFX website. Phone calls, emails, incompetency up the wazoo. And to see how much they rake in for each program that we did quite competently for ZERO $$ makes me pretty angry. Anyway, my vote goes to the genius who thought it would be a good change.
 






Here is a quote from Marshall McLuhan.

“There is an enormous redundancy in every well-written book. With a well-written book I only read the right-hand page and allow my mind to work on the left-hand page. With a poorly written book I read every word.”

Try extending this to reading every OTHER line in every e-mail. Since most are total fluff, and since original, valuable ideas are so scarce the authors will not fail to repeat them within an e-mail. Rule of thumb is for authors to say something useful in the first line and the first paragraph. Applies even more for e-mails.
 






Dick Clark or some other top level Merck exec probably did it as a favor to a buddy at PFX. Merck execs love to support their buddies who own consulting firms or organizations that claim they can do pharma services for a reduced cost, but really costs more and creates more work for the field.
 






Blame it on top Merck execs helping out a buddy that owns a consulting firm or an organization that allegedly provides a pharma service at a reduced cost, but really costs more and puts more work on the field.
 


















Top Bottom
Back
Quote