When you have lost Jon Steward







That was great!! I loved the "Fox News, call your doctor" comment. Still giggling.

Out of all of the clips that I saw, Lebowitz was the only one that mentioned the DNC bundler, who was a huge investor in this scheme. UUberfem on the sniveling little coward show (Maher), didn't even mention that tidy little tidbit. "PASS THIS BILL!"
 






Too funny, watch him pull a W and say he had bad information!

Hey Brock, like the guy who had the balls (Harry Truman) to end WW2 said. "The buck stops here!" :cool:
 






Too funny, watch him pull a W and say he had bad information!

Hey Brock, like the guy who had the balls (Harry Truman) to end WW2 said. "The buck stops here!" :cool:

Once again, you make a fool of yourself by either being ignorant of the facts or letting bias get in the way of your judgement.

W did have bad information. Just like Clinton before him.

Intelligence is an inherently inexact and problematic endeavor. Your cheap shot at W just makes you look bad.
 






Once again, you make a fool of yourself by either being ignorant of the facts or letting bias get in the way of your judgement.

W did have bad information. Just like Clinton before him.

Intelligence is an inherently inexact and problematic endeavor. Your cheap shot at W just makes you look bad.

Agreed that it was bad intelligence in Iraq that everyone had. But Bonesman II sought the truth that he wanted. Remember that oil was supposed to pay for it. How's that working out for us?
 






Once again, you make a fool of yourself by either being ignorant of the facts or letting bias get in the way of your judgement.

W did have bad information. Just like Clinton before him.

Intelligence is an inherently inexact and problematic endeavor. Your cheap shot at W just makes you look bad.

Hmm, I guess you're right - Obama may have had bad info - so - I forgive him. I still think they both jumped the gun but your liberal view of innocent until proven guilty makes me back off.
 






Funny....he had plenty of info telling him that this was a very big mistake. (have you even been following this scandal at all?) Just another example of Obama's routine incompetence.

Yes, I am following it. For the record I think George W Bush and Barack H Obama are both clueless. It will be interesting to see what the Republicansd put together because right now, as it is, it's theirs to lose. When you have one candidate calling another a bribe taker, it presents the picture of a fractured party. So we have a fractured president running against a fractured party - coin toss anyone? Fortubnately I'm retiring Dec 31st and will be looking for alternative digs.

I love this country but I'm afraid we're in a gridlock that isn't going to end during my lifetime. There are 2 teams of lawyers milking our land.
 






Yes, I am following it. For the record I think George W Bush and Barack H Obama are both clueless. It will be interesting to see what the Republicansd put together because right now, as it is, it's theirs to lose. When you have one candidate calling another a bribe taker, it presents the picture of a fractured party. So we have a fractured president running against a fractured party - coin toss anyone? Fortubnately I'm retiring Dec 31st and will be looking for alternative digs.

I love this country but I'm afraid we're in a gridlock that isn't going to end during my lifetime. There are 2 teams of lawyers milking our land.

Please. It's not a fractured party. It's a run for the nomination. What are they supposed to do when they are running against each other, compliment each other and highlight their competitor's successes?
 






Please. It's not a fractured party. It's a run for the nomination. What are they supposed to do when they are running against each other, compliment each other and highlight their competitor's successes?

Well I would think, that members of the same party wouldn't be coining derogatory terms like 'Perrycare' nand saying he took money for a mandate (which is a bribe). That's what you say about members of the opposite party. I would say I vehemently disagree but name calling within?

USA today had a headline today that stated Republicans were 50/50 split between Perry and Romney. I call that a 'fracture'. Of couse we all know they'll be back in bed together by the election. They're all whores, every one of them.
 






Well I would think, that members of the same party wouldn't be coining derogatory terms like 'Perrycare' nand saying he took money for a mandate (which is a bribe). That's what you say about members of the opposite party. I would say I vehemently disagree but name calling within?

USA today had a headline today that stated Republicans were 50/50 split between Perry and Romney. I call that a 'fracture'. Of couse we all know they'll be back in bed together by the election. They're all whores, every one of them.

The GOP is eating it's own young during this nomination process with each candidate trying to out conservative each other. As I have said, the best candidate that would have a broad based appeal to voters on both sides of the aisle, in my opinion, would be John Huntsman. Unfortunately, the republican teaparty types are too dense to realize that.
 






Please. It's not a fractured party. It's a run for the nomination. What are they supposed to do when they are running against each other, compliment each other and highlight their competitor's successes?

Liberals want everyone to march in lock-step to their Fearless Leader, the same way they do. It is inappropriate to be an individual in the Democratic Party. You must do exactly as you are told. They don't understand this "independent thinking" stuff.
 






Well I would think, that members of the same party wouldn't be coining derogatory terms like 'Perrycare' nand saying he took money for a mandate (which is a bribe). That's what you say about members of the opposite party. I would say I vehemently disagree but name calling within?

USA today had a headline today that stated Republicans were 50/50 split between Perry and Romney. I call that a 'fracture'. Of couse we all know they'll be back in bed together by the election. They're all whores, every one of them.

Yet out of the debates, what it is that makes the news and that people remember?

Yeah, Clinton and obama were sure sweet to each other!