anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
What is the real deal? What is the big secret?
What is the real deal? What is the big secret?
Definitely seems like more of the respiratory force got whacked.
It is ILLEGAL to provide CONFIDENTIAL employment information on any public site! Respect individual privacy rights! You can be charged with a crime by "fishing" for employment status.What happened to the managed care and health system people? Mine won’t call me back.
It is ILLEGAL to provide CONFIDENTIAL employment information on any public site! Respect individual privacy rights! You can be charged with a crime by "fishing" for employment status.
It is ILLEGAL to provide CONFIDENTIAL employment information on any public site! Respect individual privacy rights! You can be charged with a crime by "fishing" for employment status.
That sounds about right. How many contract reps were let go in addition to that? I am not sure how many there were on the diabetes team & the respiratory team. Does anyone know?500 (25%)
That sounds about right. How many contract reps were let go in addition to that? I am not sure how many there were on the diabetes team & the respiratory team. Does anyone know?
Please provide your IP address so HR and Security can readily proceed to litigation.All contract reps for diabetes were let go. I’d assume the same for respiratory but cannot confirm that.
All contract reps for diabetes were let go. I’d assume the same for respiratory but cannot confirm that.
Contract rep here. Can confirm all diabetes and respiratory reps scrapped.
It is ILLEGAL to provide CONFIDENTIAL employment information on any public site! Respect individual privacy rights! You can be charged with a crime by "fishing" for employment status.
Yes, I know both the contract diabetes and respiratory reps are gone, but how many were there to begin with?Contract rep here. Can confirm all diabetes and respiratory reps scrapped.
Not true.anyone over 40 got the list. title and age of "eligible" people. I'll scan and post for you all to see
Actually, that is true. Its federal law that for layoffs that are sizeable enough to enact the WARN act, any employee over 40 is in a different class.Not true.
Maybe only the people over 40 that were let go get that list and the rest do not. I think that is how it goes.Actually, that is true. Its federal law that for layoffs that are sizeable enough to enact the WARN act, any employee over 40 is in a different class.
They have to be provided a file of positions and age of those retained vs not. Obviously, no names are provided.
Therefore, any company has to abide by sending out a "list".
I can guarantee that all white males over 45 were placed on the "A" list for dismissal. Lawsuits will be flowing!Maybe only the people over 40 that were let go get that list and the rest do not. I think that is how it goes.