Wow, you say this with such conviction, yet your comment is so silly. Roger, and all other key executives, with inside knowledge would have gone straight to prison, if what you said were true; don't you know this? If this purported illegal activtiy were so clear and obvious to you, it would also be to the federal govt.
It has always been about share holder value. First they listened to those interested in purchase; clearly there was value if someone was willing to pay a 50% premium for a share of stock. With that not working out, they took on additional debt, in order to provide a great dividend; again, this is great value to share holders.
Warner Chillcott is an absolute cash generating machine, so the additional debt means very little. If it was detrimental, they would not have needlessly taken it on. So, stop being so negative,shut up, and do what you are paid to do.