Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
So why did they remove the VP of Regulatory for Vision Care?
According the the CEO in 2012 there are going to be a lot of Vision Care products coming out. A new lens in mid-year and a new solution by the end of the year. Is this no longer the case?
Are these products not getting approved by the FDA or by other regulatory agencies around the world?
Was the VP just a fall guy for the rest of the Vision Care organization that is under performing from early research to submission? Seems likely because if you are having problems with submissions the cure is simple. Just hire a bunch of consultants and you should be able to produce an regulatory approval. However if the products are technically flawed then it does not matter how many consultants you get you will never get the product approved for sale.
According the the CEO in 2012 there are going to be a lot of Vision Care products coming out. A new lens in mid-year and a new solution by the end of the year. Is this no longer the case?
Are these products not getting approved by the FDA or by other regulatory agencies around the world?
Was the VP just a fall guy for the rest of the Vision Care organization that is under performing from early research to submission? Seems likely because if you are having problems with submissions the cure is simple. Just hire a bunch of consultants and you should be able to produce an regulatory approval. However if the products are technically flawed then it does not matter how many consultants you get you will never get the product approved for sale.