Vaccine vials with a little something extra

Anonymous

Guest
Charred shrink wrap detected in Merck vials


By Tracy Staton Comment | Forward | Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn
The latest snafu at Merck's West Point, PA, vaccines plant shows just how tough it can be to fix manufacturing problems once they begin. After a series of quality-control issues and reporting shortfalls, charred particles of shrink wrap have been found in some West Point vials, the Wall Street Journal reports. The products affected include the human papillomavirus shot Gardasil, the chicken pox vaccine Varivax, and the pneumococcal vaccine Pneumovax.

Merck said the particles were found at a reported rate of less than one in 6 million vials, and that it's not aware of any adverse events linked to the problem. The company also said vaccines that contain particles could trigger a reaction at the injection site, but neither sterility nor potency should be compromised. FDA said, however, that safety risks from the shrink wrap bits can't be ruled out. The company has submitted at least a dozen reports to FDA about charred shrink wrap found in vaccines, some prompted by customer complaints.

As the Journal points out, FDA issued a warning letter in 2008 highlighting problems at the West Point plant. Since then, agency inspectors have found more problems: metal particles in vials, cracked vials, plus delays in required adverse-event reports to FDA. None of those resulted in another warning letter, however, and Merck officials said they've made progress. "What we are seeing is that the severity and criticality of observations [by FDA inspectors] are declining," Merck's vaccines VP James Robinson told the WSJ. "What we've seen in the last few inspections tells us we're on the right track."

Unfortunately, Merck is far from alone in finding particles in injectable drugs. Particulate contamination has touched off a series of warning letters and even recalls in recent months. Flu vaccine maker CSL was cited by FDA for dark particles found in its multi-dose vials. Johnson & Johnson and Takeda Pharmaceutical recalled vials of the blood cancer drug Velcade after visible particles were found. Glass bits have been identified in several companies' injectable products, prompting several recalls. Claris LifeSciences pulled antibiotics and anti-nausea drugs found to contain floating matter. And just last week, silicone particles touched off a recall at American Regent.

- read the WSJ piece

Related Articles:
Merck warned on vaccine plant problems
As HPV data stacks up, Merck touts Gardasil for boys
Japan ushers in big meds from AZ, GSK, Merck

Read more about: Merck, vaccine plant, manufacturing, Gardasil
back to top
 
























Alina's under-stooges monitor this site as they pulled a comment from here when someone commented about her weight. It is what it is, or rather was. It is what it was.
 












QA has always been a joke at SP and it has spilled over into Merck.

I have worked now with quality leaders from both legacy S-P and legacy Merck and aware of situations that might result in product recall. My impression is that the Merck side is more interested in justifying what they can get away with and the S-P side is more likely to err on the side of caution. I have no axe to grind either way. If you believe that Merck's quality is tops, you would be wrong. If you would attribute Merck's quality system failures to S-P influence you would be very wrong.
 






Blame everything on Schering....like Obama blames everything on Bush. The fact is, Merck, like Obama, is a joke.

Not a discussion for here but- Bush did set up the country and Obama to fail. Maybe Obama has not done anything notable but Bush certainly did- tax cuts to those who least needed them, 2 wars that are killing and maiming our kids while draining massive dollars that we could have used here, unemployment continually rising until he vacated the WH and then it continued to rise.
 






I have worked now with quality leaders from both legacy S-P and legacy Merck and aware of situations that might result in product recall. My impression is that the Merck side is more interested in justifying what they can get away with and the S-P side is more likely to err on the side of caution. I have no axe to grind either way. If you believe that Merck's quality is tops, you would be wrong. If you would attribute Merck's quality system failures to S-P influence you would be very wrong.

Lets take away old SP and Merck. Is it safe to write that as of right now QA at new Merck is not proforming well. Would it be wrong to write that changes need to be made there. Maybe process, maybe getting rid of people. Maybe both. Lets take the past out of this and write about the present.
 






Merck will not invest in enhancing its quality systems. Rather it will outsource its manufacturing and plead ignorance whenever GMP issues arise. If they have 3 suppliers and one gets sniffed at, they'll quietly drop them. Anyway, since regulatory agencies visit most Asian manufacturing facilities about as often as Halley's comet does, the odds of getting caught up in an inspection issue such as this are a lot less. And even it the manufacturer were under serious scrutiny, Merck would plead ignorance. In time, there will be nobody left at Merck with any suitable first-hand manufacturing experience that will be skillful at auditing Merck's suppliers. At least, that is, until they add courses on GMP to MBA programs.