USA: Obama Care's website - "It's a winner"!

Anonymous

Guest
"Look past its start-up glitches — they’ll get fixed — HealthCare.gov is an out-of-the-box success for consumers shopping for health insurance.

- Glitches were due to 2.8 million people hitting the website on the first day
- Premiums in the marketplace are significantly cheaper than expected, even without federal subsidies. For example, for a 40-year-old nonsmoker, the site’s policy will cost $2,700 a year less than the average employer-provided health care coverage for the same person. That’s a pretty significant savings.

Having an open marketplaces where companies compete for your business in an open and transparent way is exactly the kind of market-based solution that you would think Republicans would be promoting. After all, they came up with the idea. Maybe they aren’t telling the truth when they claim to be in favor of free enterprise.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/10/03/healthcaregov-website-review/2912987/
 






It's a winner? LOL
How many people are actually signing up?

The administration has acknowledged the importance of that question, by touting the number of people who went to healthcare.gov on Oct. 1 -- 4.7 million unique visitors, which is an impressive number. But it's also a disingenuous number, as it implies significant demand for Obamacare without actually stating how many people have applied.
That's the number that matters, and it's a number the administration won't reveal. Is it possible the glitches have been so great that the government doesn't know how many people have signed up? Perhaps -- but if that's the case, then those glitches are more serious than the government is letting on. The Obama White House wants more than anyone to know how many people are buying exchange coverage, and it's hard to believe it doesn't yet have that information.
A more likely explanation is that the number of people applying for insurance is so low that releasing it would undercut the administration's message about the great demand for, and by extension the necessity of, maintaining Obamacare.

So much for being transparent.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-03/show-us-the-obamacare-exchange-numbers-.html
 






It's a winner? LOL
How many people are actually signing up?

The administration has acknowledged the importance of that question, by touting the number of people who went to healthcare.gov on Oct. 1 -- 4.7 million unique visitors, which is an impressive number. But it's also a disingenuous number, as it implies significant demand for Obamacare without actually stating how many people have applied.
That's the number that matters, and it's a number the administration won't reveal. Is it possible the glitches have been so great that the government doesn't know how many people have signed up? Perhaps -- but if that's the case, then those glitches are more serious than the government is letting on. The Obama White House wants more than anyone to know how many people are buying exchange coverage, and it's hard to believe it doesn't yet have that information.
A more likely explanation is that the number of people applying for insurance is so low that releasing it would undercut the administration's message about the great demand for, and by extension the necessity of, maintaining Obamacare.

So much for being transparent.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-03/show-us-the-obamacare-exchange-numbers-.html

Why would they show it to you when they have already said that the websites are brocken?

No one but morons like you think that this is an issue.

I can't wait until this issue get crammed down your fucking Tea Bagger throat.
 






Why would they show it to you when they have already said that the websites are brocken?

No one but morons like you think that this is an issue.

I can't wait until this issue get crammed down your fucking Tea Bagger throat.

The website is "brocken" like your broke-ass spellchecker. Aren't you even the least bit curious how they can tell us how many people go to the website, but not how many actually enroll? You are a TRUE-BELIEVER.
 






The website is "brocken" like your broke-ass spellchecker. Aren't you even the least bit curious how they can tell us how many people go to the website, but not how many actually enroll? You are a TRUE-BELIEVER.

They could tell us but they won't because they have admitted that the sites are broken and people who want to enroll can't. If they gave a number then morons like you would use it as an arguement that people don't want it rather then want it and cant get it.

So they will wait for the monthly figures which will be AFTER they get it fixed and then the number will be large and more indicative of success.

So just like in the last election where you beleived, against all facts, the Romeny would win, I know that all data says that people want Obama Care and will sign up for it when they can.

Your beleifs are farces my friend.
 












Apparently, Reality is not a friend of yours...

45% View Health Care Law Favorably, 49% Unfavorably

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law

Rasmusen?

"The final Rasmussen Reports daily tracking poll showed Mitt Romney with 49 percent national support and President Obama with 48 percent national support.[49] Obama won the election by close to 4 percentage points."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports

stupid fuker. Faux Facts
 






Rasmusen?

"The final Rasmussen Reports daily tracking poll showed Mitt Romney with 49 percent national support and President Obama with 48 percent national support.[49] Obama won the election by close to 4 percentage points."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports

stupid fuker. Faux Facts

So Rasmussen is illegitimate, Fox News is illegitimate, what else? Are we only to trust Bill Maher, MSLSD and Jay Carney? Apparently you live in a complete, close-minded, liberal bubble. So you really believe Obamacare is anything other than unpopular?
Will you accept A USA Today/Pew poll?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-pew-poll-health-care-law-opposition/2817169/