• Mon news: Ventyx gets boost from Sanofi. PhRMA IRA legal challenge gets new life. AZ breast cancer drug disappoints. Teva’s once-monthly schizophrenia med. AZ gets FDA approval for first self-administered flu vaccine. See more on our front page

TOP TAKEOVER TARGETS IN 2011.....GUESS WHO IS #1????

Anonymous

Guest
Top Biotech Takeout Targets in 2011
By Josh Lipton Feb 18, 2011 1:30 pm
Investors can expect another impressive year of M&A activity in 2011. Here, the biotechnology companies most likely to be bought.
(3) Comments Share this article:
TD Ameritrade. Trade commission-free for 30 days.

Mergers and acquisitions in biotechnology saw a strong year in 2010 with 91 acquisitions of firms with market capitalizations exceeding $100 million. Morningstar research analysts, in their recently released annual report on the health care M&A landscape, say investors can expect another impressive year of M&A activity in 2011, and highlight the biotech companies that they believe are most likely to be bought.

Biotech, in particular, remains an attractive investment for Big Pharma, which as a group has not fully seized the opportunity to put cash balances to work through acquisitions, but still faces pressure from the rapidly approaching patent cliff, says Damien Conover, Morningstar’s associate director of health care.

“There is a strong group of acquirers in Big Pharma that remain very motivated to do these acquisitions,” he says. “They have a huge patent cliff coming up and they just don’t have products in their own pipelines to offset that. Also, they have very strong balance sheets and cash flow generation so they have the means to acquire growth.”

Despite increasing buyback activity, the 20 largest health-care firms held 15% of their total assets, on average, in cash and equivalents versus 12% of total assets held, on average, for the rest of Morningstar’s stock universe.

Conover and his team of analysts, after surveying the entire biotech space, came up with 15 companies that are the most likely takeout targets this year. To assess the odds of a takeout for each small- and mid-cap biotech name, the analysts developed a methodology that took into account the company’s drug portfolio strength, collaborative fit with potential partners, profit-boosting power and financial health.

Topping the 2011 list: Biogen Idec (BIIB), which secured the No. 1 ranking given its renewed focus on its core strength in neurology, large late-stage pipeline, and growing foundation of profitability.

“There are certain areas that Big Pharma really wants to move into such as neurology and oncology,” says Conover. “It’s easier to get drugs in these therapeutic classes through the regulatory process because there aren’t many treatment options out there. Those are both areas of focus for Biogen Idec.”

Specifically, Conover thinks Biogen could be a logical target for Roche. The two companies already partner on cancer blockbuster Rituxan, and acquiring Biogen would bring full rights to Rituxan, next-generation cancer products, as well as Bio*gen’s growing neurology portfolio.

Rounding out the takeout list: Seattle Genetics (SGEN), which has an innovative antibody-drug conjugate technology allowing for a more targeted attack on cancer cells. There’s also Human Genome Sciences (HGSI), which scored highly due to its expected approval for lupus drug Benlysta in March and several collaborations with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

“It could happen that GlaxoSmithKline is actually the one to pull the trigger there,” says Conover. “Often, in these kinds of partnerships, as the drug gets closer to market, the economics look strong or it just makes sense to bring the company in-house.”

He also thinks Dendreon (DNDN) could look attractive to Big Pharma as the approval of its drug, Provenge, illustrates the promise of the company’s cutting-edge platform, which might seem appealing to companies trying to expand into immunotherapy.

And he highlights Actelion (ATLN), which dominates an orphan drug niche. [Orphan drugs serve patient populations that are very small.] The company has four products on the market: Tracleer, Ventavis, and Veletri treat various stages of pulmonary arterial hypertension and Zavesca treats Gaucher disease.

“Not too many people might be impacted by orphan drugs but, on the flip side, if the company has a drug that works for these diseases then they can charge a lot of money,” says Conover. “So you can still have a drug that’s a blockbuster.”

The other candidates on this list of 15 takeout targets, in chronological order: Exelixis (EXEL), BioMarin (BMRN), Vertex (VRTX), Celgene (CELG), Alexion (ALXN), InterMune (ITMN), Lexicon (LXRX), Savient (SVNT), Merck KGaA, and Shire (SHPGY).

Finally, there were some important changes to the annual takeover target list. For instance, InterMune fell from No. 4 in 2010 to No. 11 due to a lower Drug Portfolio Strength score.

While the Morningstar team still considers InterMune’s pirfenidone a promising orphan drug, the firm’s decision to sell rights to its hepatitis C drug candidate to Roche removes diversification and novelty from its portfolio, they argue.

Also, Vertex fell from No. 1 in 2010 to No. 8, due to changes in its scores for Financial Health and Profit-Boosting Power. The firm monetized its royalties for telaprevir and has raised substantial amounts of cash over the past 18 months, reducing future profits from the drug and pushing out the time to reach Morningstar’s highest category of profitability. This monetization boosted Vertex’s cash balance to roughly $1 billion today, which reduces its need for a buyer, says Conover.
 

<



Top Biotech Takeout Targets in 2011
By Josh Lipton Feb 18, 2011 1:30 pm
Investors can expect another impressive year of M&A activity in 2011. Here, the biotechnology companies most likely to be bought.
(3) Comments Share this article:
TD Ameritrade. Trade commission-free for 30 days.

Mergers and acquisitions in biotechnology saw a strong year in 2010 with 91 acquisitions of firms with market capitalizations exceeding $100 million. Morningstar research analysts, in their recently released annual report on the health care M&A landscape, say investors can expect another impressive year of M&A activity in 2011, and highlight the biotech companies that they believe are most likely to be bought.

Biotech, in particular, remains an attractive investment for Big Pharma, which as a group has not fully seized the opportunity to put cash balances to work through acquisitions, but still faces pressure from the rapidly approaching patent cliff, says Damien Conover, Morningstar’s associate director of health care.

“There is a strong group of acquirers in Big Pharma that remain very motivated to do these acquisitions,” he says. “They have a huge patent cliff coming up and they just don’t have products in their own pipelines to offset that. Also, they have very strong balance sheets and cash flow generation so they have the means to acquire growth.”

Despite increasing buyback activity, the 20 largest health-care firms held 15% of their total assets, on average, in cash and equivalents versus 12% of total assets held, on average, for the rest of Morningstar’s stock universe.

Conover and his team of analysts, after surveying the entire biotech space, came up with 15 companies that are the most likely takeout targets this year. To assess the odds of a takeout for each small- and mid-cap biotech name, the analysts developed a methodology that took into account the company’s drug portfolio strength, collaborative fit with potential partners, profit-boosting power and financial health.

Topping the 2011 list: Biogen Idec (BIIB), which secured the No. 1 ranking given its renewed focus on its core strength in neurology, large late-stage pipeline, and growing foundation of profitability.

“There are certain areas that Big Pharma really wants to move into such as neurology and oncology,” says Conover. “It’s easier to get drugs in these therapeutic classes through the regulatory process because there aren’t many treatment options out there. Those are both areas of focus for Biogen Idec.”

Specifically, Conover thinks Biogen could be a logical target for Roche. The two companies already partner on cancer blockbuster Rituxan, and acquiring Biogen would bring full rights to Rituxan, next-generation cancer products, as well as Bio*gen’s growing neurology portfolio.

Rounding out the takeout list: Seattle Genetics (SGEN), which has an innovative antibody-drug conjugate technology allowing for a more targeted attack on cancer cells. There’s also Human Genome Sciences (HGSI), which scored highly due to its expected approval for lupus drug Benlysta in March and several collaborations with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

“It could happen that GlaxoSmithKline is actually the one to pull the trigger there,” says Conover. “Often, in these kinds of partnerships, as the drug gets closer to market, the economics look strong or it just makes sense to bring the company in-house.”

He also thinks Dendreon (DNDN) could look attractive to Big Pharma as the approval of its drug, Provenge, illustrates the promise of the company’s cutting-edge platform, which might seem appealing to companies trying to expand into immunotherapy.

And he highlights Actelion (ATLN), which dominates an orphan drug niche. [Orphan drugs serve patient populations that are very small.] The company has four products on the market: Tracleer, Ventavis, and Veletri treat various stages of pulmonary arterial hypertension and Zavesca treats Gaucher disease.

“Not too many people might be impacted by orphan drugs but, on the flip side, if the company has a drug that works for these diseases then they can charge a lot of money,” says Conover. “So you can still have a drug that’s a blockbuster.”

The other candidates on this list of 15 takeout targets, in chronological order: Exelixis (EXEL), BioMarin (BMRN), Vertex (VRTX), Celgene (CELG), Alexion (ALXN), InterMune (ITMN), Lexicon (LXRX), Savient (SVNT), Merck KGaA, and Shire (SHPGY).

Finally, there were some important changes to the annual takeover target list. For instance, InterMune fell from No. 4 in 2010 to No. 11 due to a lower Drug Portfolio Strength score.

While the Morningstar team still considers InterMune’s pirfenidone a promising orphan drug, the firm’s decision to sell rights to its hepatitis C drug candidate to Roche removes diversification and novelty from its portfolio, they argue.

Also, Vertex fell from No. 1 in 2010 to No. 8, due to changes in its scores for Financial Health and Profit-Boosting Power. The firm monetized its royalties for telaprevir and has raised substantial amounts of cash over the past 18 months, reducing future profits from the drug and pushing out the time to reach Morningstar’s highest category of profitability. This monetization boosted Vertex’s cash balance to roughly $1 billion today, which reduces its need for a buyer, says Conover.


If you had .00001% of an ounce of business sense you would have know this to be true (or at least we were in the top 3) that the company will be bought out in 2-2.5 yrs max. I have been through three previous acquisitions and thus far everything in line with what happened in the three previous companies. Layoffs (restructuring), new CEO, increased clinical focus on smaller number of therapeutic areas, reigning in some of the resources that the field can use, buying back of outstanding shares, consistent PR statements on how the company plans to move forward (2-4 year organizational business strategy), a few other small things to increase the stock price. All of the above besides increasing the stock price and PR announcements are to make the company more lean, have less debt, and more focused on a smaller number of therapeutic areas of concentration allowing for specific companies who are interested in acquiring us become more interested. It's funny how so many of you are in denial when it comes to this issue...
 
















WOW!!!! It's just about over now. This is something Mullen said would never happen at Biogen.............

(Reuters) - Biogen Idec Inc's (BIIB.O) board is proposing that all directors be elected on an annual basis as opposed to the current process of staggered term elections, the company said on Friday.

The biotechnology company, a frequently rumored takeover target, proposed declassifying its 12-member board in its annual proxy filing. Currently, one-third of the board is elected each year.

Shareholders will vote on the proposal at Biogen's annual shareholder meeting on June 2.

"More and more, a declassified board is considered good corporate governance, so it furthers our goal of ensuring that our management and our board of directors is accountable to stockholders," Biogen spokeswoman Naomi Aoki said, adding that the change would allow shareholders to register their views on board annually.

A staggered board makes it harder to wage proxy battles, and is often seen as a defense tactic in hostile takeover situations, so the move to annual elections could make it easier for any potential bidder.

Activist investor Carl Icahn has three representatives on Biogen's board. (Reporting by Lewis Krauskopf; Editing by Gary Hill)
 




The takeover or sale of the the company in parts is coming soon. They are just putting things in place to make this process easier. I am the one who posted this up above. How some people are oblivious to this is remarkable. Wait and see...

If you had .00001% of an ounce of business sense you would have know this to be true (or at least we were in the top 3) that the company will be bought out in 2-2.5 yrs max. I have been through three previous acquisitions and thus far everything in line with what happened in the three previous companies. Layoffs (restructuring), new CEO, increased clinical focus on smaller number of therapeutic areas, reigning in some of the resources that the field can use, buying back of outstanding shares, consistent PR statements on how the company plans to move forward (2-4 year organizational business strategy), a few other small things to increase the stock price. All of the above besides increasing the stock price and PR announcements are to make the company more lean, have less debt, and more focused on a smaller number of therapeutic areas of concentration allowing for specific companies who are interested in acquiring us become more interested. It's funny how so many of you are in denial when it comes to this issue...
 




So who gives a shit Mr. Nut? So someone buys us, our stock cashes out and we work for the new company and life goes on. Stop making a big deal about nothing. Every company like Biogen will have "that day" come.

Big deal!
 




You hope you get to work for the new company. Big companies are cutting reps like crazy, so what makes you think they will keep you???? They don't give a shit if you have MS experience, they only care about the bottom line which is saving money. Biogen reps make a hell of alot more money than big pharma reps, so you guys will be the first to get the axe. They believe they can tech their reps how to sell in the MS market. Just my opionion anyway.............