anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
The new logo is plain and ugly. How much money was wasted on it?
At least Sanofi's new logo is stylish.
At least Sanofi's new logo is stylish.
The new logo is plain and ugly. How much money was wasted on it?
At least Sanofi's new logo is stylish.
Not to mention all the packaging, which was just changed when Ethicon moved to Raritan so “Somerville” had to be removed from the packaging.Let’s be perfectly clear and concise. The J&J logo change was 100% about creating a “new” company that no longer has a connection to Consumer ((Kenvue) and the talc lawsuits. It’s not about children failing to learn how to write cursive in schools. How do they sign their name, in block letters?
The prior J&J logo and branding have existed for 139 years, now one demented non-Amercan clown changed it.
Let’s see if the talc plaintiffs buy it. Still wasting millions of dollars on this change around the world. Does anyone know how many J&J logos are still being changed on buildings around the world? This is so wasteful and ultimately resulted in nothing of value. J&J LIED about the purpose. Have a brain and realize that ALL J&J decisions are made due to $$$, nothing else. Could someone please share this post with the talc plaintiffs’ lawyers.