Spot on treatments reviewed by EPA

Quote












Anonymous said:
OP is a dirty troll. Don't believe this BS without doing some research for yourself. Don't be sheep!
Click to expand...

It seems to me that this fella did not complete his own research. So sad. The message is pretty clear if you read the report, I read it too. It is not funny, simple, or easy to dismiss. It is so sad to see greedy fools who place profit over health risks. It is even more sad to see idiots who defend their poisons with such passion. What a shame.
 






Anonymous said:
It seems to me that this fella did not complete his own research. So sad. The message is pretty clear if you read the report, I read it too. It is not funny, simple, or easy to dismiss. It is so sad to see greedy fools who place profit over health risks. It is even more sad to see idiots who defend their poisons with such passion. What a shame.
Click to expand...

EPA hired Hesperian Group and several other firms to submit feedback based on the investigation at hand. The investigation is ongoing and has scary implications to big pharma. I'm working for a Veterinarian who is directly involved with EPA and he spends a lot of time filtering through paper work provided by Johns Hopkins, Kaiser Permanente, and other sources. As a result of the work so far, EPA labeling guidelines for new products are being revised to require smaller dose bands. Ask your product development department to verify the so called "crap." FL will probably survive the flurry of changes, but major warnings will be added to the label at some point. Remember the cigarette warnings before and after big brother got involved? In the era 50s - 70s smoking was considered "good for you."

Have a smoke and a spot-on!
 






Top Bottom
Back
Quote