Solyndra - Why aren't the Libtards gettin' after it?

RockificationSpacification

Guest






Is this what Al Bore meant by an "Inconveinent Truth"? No libbie here will touch this. They will scatter off into the shadows till it blows over.....as usual. Funny thing is...things just keep snowballing for the liberal 20%.

The best part? The Obamacrats are tring to blame THIS on Bush! This is better than an old Marx brothers movie!
 






So Libtards,

All we heard was you whining about Enron / Bush / Rove / Haliburton (which by the way Obama has awarded Haliburton a 560+ M no-bid contract)

So now we learn that a "green" company that is supposed to generate jobs is going under and it is looking Obama has direct ties to their $500M loan. Yes, that is half a BILLION dollars.

Libtards? Please, can you not be such fucking hypocrites for ONCE?? Seriously. Where is the outrage?

Why do you lie and say we have no outrage? (Remember, according to MFAS, even though I want the borders closed, I like to fuck too much so I'm a Libbie - LOL!)

I think this is right up there with the Enron thing and proves that our politicians in the bogus 2 party system ate either in bed with lobbyists or have ther eyes wide shut. I've made this pretty clear.

The first thing you need to do is drop your rigid Libbie/Neocon categorization if you want to make any sensible headway in pushing either venue. Many have views that don't perfectly co-incide with either perfect party line.
 






Why do you lie and say we have no outrage? (Remember, according to MFAS, even though I want the borders closed, I like to fuck too much so I'm a Libbie - LOL!)

I think this is right up there with the Enron thing and proves that our politicians in the bogus 2 party system ate either in bed with lobbyists or have ther eyes wide shut. I've made this pretty clear.

The first thing you need to do is drop your rigid Libbie/Neocon categorization if you want to make any sensible headway in pushing either venue. Many have views that don't perfectly co-incide with either perfect party line.

A few conservative positions do not make one a conservative. You are basically a liberal. Period.

A short while ago, you were still longing for a good Democrat presidential nominee. No conservative would ever do that because they know that there is no such thing.
 






A few conservative positions do not make one a conservative. You are basically a liberal. Period.

A short while ago, you were still longing for a good Democrat presidential nominee. No conservative would ever do that because they know that there is no such thing.

I've never purported to be a conservative because I don't buy anyone's total party line. I also don't buy the total classic liberal line. I'm a registered independent who's more of a centrist than anything else. We're the swing voters who (when it gets down to it) elect the presidents. When we get in the booth, if we haven't already made up our minds, and we associate the statements like you make every day with the word 'Republican', that can be enough to make some of us vote the other way. On the other hand, if we think of some of the rational arguments put forth by consrvatives who aren't knee-jerk, name calling people, then some of us may vote your way. Remember that. Just like the religious issue, as a purported evangelis, you turn more people off to than you turn on - not only to religion but to politics.

People with attitudes like yours contribute to eventual socialism in this country.
 


















Libtards veeeewy quiet on dis one. Looks like they are circling the wagons, and consulting with their leaders on how to possibly spin this.

Has anyone realized that just about every company Obama has sought a photo op with has gone under?
 






I've never purported to be a conservative because I don't buy anyone's total party line. I also don't buy the total classic liberal line. I'm a registered independent who's more of a centrist than anything else. We're the swing voters who (when it gets down to it) elect the presidents. When we get in the booth, if we haven't already made up our minds, and we associate the statements like you make every day with the word 'Republican', that can be enough to make some of us vote the other way. On the other hand, if we think of some of the rational arguments put forth by consrvatives who aren't knee-jerk, name calling people, then some of us may vote your way. Remember that. Just like the religious issue, as a purported evangelis, you turn more people off to than you turn on - not only to religion but to politics.

People with attitudes like yours contribute to eventual socialism in this country.

No, it's people with attitudes and what passes for "thinking" like you that contribute to eventual socialism in this country.

So, you're an independent, a centrist. In other words, you can't figure things out and basically have no core convictions.

There is no other rational choice other than Republican in presidential elections. It's a easy call that you unnecessarily and foolishly complicate.
 






Libtards veeeewy quiet on dis one. Looks like they are circling the wagons, and consulting with their leaders on how to possibly spin this.

Has anyone realized that just about every company Obama has sought a photo op with has gone under?

They are beginning to see that the Obama culture of corruption is becoming so profoundly evident that it's going to be near impossible to cover up from here on out and with the election coming next year, they can see disaster.

Solyndra and Fast and Furious are going to take major tolls on McCarbama come next year.

McCarbama? My new pet name for Obama indicating that he will probably lose somewhere between 43 states like Carter did and 49 states like McGovern did!
 






No, it's people with attitudes and what passes for "thinking" like you that contribute to eventual socialism in this country.

So, you're an independent, a centrist. In other words, you can't figure things out and basically have no core convictions.

There is no other rational choice other than Republican in presidential elections. It's a easy call that you unnecessarily and foolishly complicate.

If we followed YOUR thinking there would be 46 million more people (the estimated number of abortions since Roe vs Wade) in this country - most of whom would have little education and a dysfunctional upbringing.

Just what we need - right? Then we could be like India or China. Woo hoo!